Lanun: Bezanya Francis Light dengan Haris Ibrahim

June 24, 2012 at 8:31 pm 13 comments

Haris Ibrahim pernah berkata sumbangan dana sehingga RM10 juta telah diterima oleh/dijanjikan kepada Malaysian Civil Liberties Movement yang [dahulu] dipeloporinya.

Lihat video wawancara Haris dengan Malaysiakini (17 Dis 2010), mulai minit 6:00.

Laporan ‘Haris quits as MCLM president‘ oleh The Star pada 2 Jan 2012 menjelaskan:

“MCLM was formed in 2010 as a platform to offer ‘carefully vetted and chosen’ candidates in the general election, to be fielded by Opposition parties”.

RM10 juta itu perbelanjaan untuk mempromosi calon-calon Third Force yang diketengahkan MCLM.

Haris telah menggunakan alat Integrity Meter ciptaannya untuk “menapis dan memilih” calon-calon PRU yang lulus pemeriksaan ‘Sirim’nya. Rujuk kenyataan akhbar Haris yang mengatakan “many of the 16 candidates (from SNAP for the 2011 Sarawak state election) are regarded as high-risk, integrity-wise”. Yang mereka ini gagal.

Tahukan anda bahawa Kapten Francis Light yang disanjung DAPsters sebagai ‘pengasas’ Pulau Pinang telah menamakan anaknya sebagai ‘Lanun’ (diejanya ‘Lanoon’).

Ini fakta sahih yang ada dalam rekod sejarah.

Gambar family tree (salasilah) Francis Light di bawah. Baca butir-butir selanjutnya di posting ‘Apakala Pulau Pinang diKristiankan’.

Lanun itu seorang perompak laut. Francis Light itu seorang yang sedar.

Bezanya Francis Light dengan Haris Ibrahim ialah anak buah Haris ditabalkan pula olehnya sebagai ‘saint’ yang sesuci-sucinya. Jauh sekali Haris akan mengaku pihak yang disokongnya mungkin ‘melanun’ juga.

Selangor Times menggila minggu ini

Sebelum kita menyambung perbincangan berkenaan rasuah dan penyalah-gunaan kuasa, biar kita lihat Selangor Times keluaran terkini (Jun 22-24).

Selangor Times memaparkan gambar Teresa Kok di halaman 2, 4, 6 dan 9 (lihat screenshot).

Gambar Nurul Izzah dipaparkan di halaman 4, 15 dan 22.

Sementara itu, di muka depannya Selangor Times telah menghentam menteri MCA, muka 2 hentam polis, (muka 3 iklan penuh), muka 4 hentam Dewan Rakyat atas kes Scorpene, muka 7 memetik Hannah Yeoh, muka 8 hentam Jawi, muka 11 kolum Wong Chin Huat ahli jawatankuasa pemandu Bersih, muka 12-13 hentam ETP.

Tajuk muka 18 ialah ‘taste of China’s bold flavours‘.

‘Excellent candidate material’

Semalam saya memblog ‘Haris harus jawab‘ sama ada beliau merestui Azmin Ali jikalau diberikan jawatan tinggi dalam kabinet Pakatan yang setimpal dengan darjatnya (seniority) dalam PKR sebagai timbalan presiden.

Walaupun Haris tidak lagi bersama MCLM tetapi beliau masih lagi meneruskan usaha ABUnya dan kini berada di Labuan. Rujuk juga surat balas Haris kepada Anas Zubedy berkenaan matlamat ABU, yakni

“The ABU initiative looks to displace Umno / BN from Putrajaya through the 13th General Election, by ensuring that the people wisen up to the wholesale looting of the national wealth that has taken place throughout Umno / BN’s rule …” (sumber: sini)

Berikut ialah cabaran Haris kepada Azmin berkaitan siasatan BPR dalam tahun 1999 ke atasnya.

Haris memblog:

“Azmin says he does not  have that amount of money.

“I’d like to know if there was, then, some RM10 million sitting in his and / or his wife’s bank accounts and, if so, how they came by that money?”

Sekiranya Haris masih pantang dengan kes penyiasatan BPR tahun 1999 bersabit Azmin maka seharusnya beliau juga turut prihatin terhadap siasatan SPRM ke atas Hannah Yeoh tahun 2009. Kes Azmin itu sudah 13 tahun manakala kes Hannah Yeoh baru 3 tahun.

Haris perlu bertindak dengan secara konsisten, lebih-lebih lagi sebab Haris sendiri yang memberikan cop jaminan ‘Sirim’nya bahawa Hannah ialah “excellent candidate material”, mempunyai integriti yang menggunung tingginya serta Haris menghadiahkan lain-lain pujian mencakar langit kepada Hannah.

Lihat screenshot laporan berita siasatan SPRM di kaki halaman.

Malah baru-baru ini, ada di kalangan blogger-blogger Melayu yang menyeru supaya keluarga Faekah Husin, iaitu setpol Menteri Besar Selangor Khalid Ibrahim, disiasat oleh SPRM.

Mempromosi ‘personality cult’

Kita melihat bagaimana Pejabat Menteri Besar Selangor membiayai Selangor Times yang begitu beriya-iya mempromosi personaliti evangelis DAP.

Kita melihat bagaimana Si Gunting dalam Lipatan (edisi bahasa Inggeris) sengaja menenggelamkan berita dan enggan membuat laporan susulan kalau ada cerita negatif mengenai orang DAP kesayangan mereka.

Kita melihat bagaimana MCLM dengan dana RM10 jutanya itu mempromosi Hannah Yeoh di London (waktu Adun itu ponteng enam sidang DUN bulan November 2010).

Seorang pembaca yang menggelar dirinya ‘LOL’ meninggalkan komen berbentuk soalan retorik yang berikut sebagai jawapan kepada soalan: ‘So what will make the Chinese happiest?’:

“Jaga hati dan perasaan kami (orang Cina) wahai semua orang Umno dan Melayu tapi pada masa yang sama kami orang-orang Cina boleh cakap apa saja tentang kamu (orang Melayu)?”

Sebenarnya LOL tersasar. (Sila lihat penjelasan selanjutnya oleh LOL, komen #1 di bawah)

Pada hakikatnya, DAPster boleh cakap apa sahaja tentang barang siapapun yang tidak sepuak dan sealiran dengan mereka.

Ambil contoh kenyataan Hannah Yeoh pada 21 April 2012 yang berbunyi:

“how is it possible that MCA can be defamed? In my opinion, one can only defame MCA if MCA has a good reputation to start with. MCA today is not worthy to be defamed.” (huruf tebal oleh Hannah)

Mengikut hujahnya, “one can only defame MCA if MCA has a good reputation to start with”.

Jika diikutkan Hukum Halal Hannah, “one can only defame Umno if Umno has a good reputation to start with”.

Ataupun “one can only defame blogger xyz if he/she has a good reputation to start with”, dsb.

Cawangan MCA telah membuat laporan polis terhadap Hannah Yeoh atas dakwaan dia memfitnah. Ironis sekali, Hannah menuduh Timbalan Menteri Dalam Negeri menyalah-gunakan kuasa atau dalam kata lain, satu kesalahan ‘rasuah‘.

Orang Cina boleh cakap apa saja tentang seseorang, asal dia anti-DAP darahnya dihalalkan.

Tengoklah betapa besar longgokan tohmahan dan kata-kata nista yang dilemparkan oleh DAPster. Mangsa-mangsa mereka bukan sekadar orang Umno atau orang Melayu.

Twit Meter

Seorang Twit ialah seorang yang lebih mudah mempercayai propaganda.

Kenapa agaknya Twit Meter menunjukkan kian hari kian bertambah jumlah bilangan Twit?

Pada Jun 12, kaunter Twit Meter menunjukkan ada 46,393 orang Twits.

Pada Jun 16, bilangannya berkembang menjadi 46,532 orang.

Semalam terdapat 46,734 Twits and hari ini 46,765 orang. Maksudnya selang 12 hari, Twits sudah bertambah 372 orang ataupun pada purata, there are a dozen Twits born every day.

Kenapa orang Malaysia ramai yang boleh menjadi Twit?

Jawapannya ialah gara-gara promosi ‘personality cult’ yang dijalankan oleh pelbagai pihak.

Tambahan lagi, ada politikus yang menggaji begitu ramai Pegawai Khas atau Pembantu Khas.

Pihak-pihak yang turut mempromosi ialah Selangor Times, The Star serta Haris Ibrahim dan syor “excellent candidate material”nya.

Lagi bagus daripada menang loteri!

Setiap Adun Pakatan Selangor diberikan peruntukan RM1 juta setahun untuk kawasan DUNnya, mengikut laporan media.

Ini bermakna dalam jangkamasa 5 tahun perkhidmatannya, sudah RM5 juta mengalir melalui tangan seseorang Adun Pakatan Selangor negeri paling kaya di negara kita.

Lihat laporan mStar di bawah yang mengatakan:

“SPRM telah memulakan siasatan ke atas tujuh ADUN Pakatan Rakyat Selangor berhubung penggunaan wang peruntukan kerajaan negeri.

“Tujuh ADUN yang didakwa terlibat dalam kes salah guna peruntukan negeri tersebut ialah … Hannah Yeoh (DAP-Subang Jaya) … .

“SPRM Selangor masih meneruskan siasatan berhubung kes berkenaan walaupun kelancarannya terganggu dengan kematian saksi kes, Teoh Beng Hock.”

Haris Ibrahim tidak berpuashati dengan status NFA (no further action) kes BPR Azmin Ali tahun 1999 tetapi tidak berkata apa-apa tentang kes SPRM Hannah Yeoh tahun 2009?

Bukankah Haris Ibrahim pencipta Integrity Meter yang pernah mendakwa “many of the 16 candidates (from SNAP for the 2011 Sarawak state election) are regarded as high-risk, integrity-wise”?

Calon-calon DAP kegemaran Haris no risk kerana mereka sudah mencapai sainthood kot.

Screenshot: Adun Selangor turut melaporkan tentang peruntukan RM1 juta setahun.

About these ads

Entry filed under: SUCKER. Tags: , , , , , , .

Ha-ha-ha, Haris harus jawab 51 photos of Guan Eng in single edition of Buletin Mutiara

13 Comments Add your own

  • 1. LOL  |  June 24, 2012 at 10:32 pm

    “Seorang pembaca yang menggelar dirinya ‘LOL’ meninggalkan komen berbentuk soalan retorik yang berikut:

    “Jaga hati dan perasaan kami (orang Cina) wahai semua orang Umno dan Melayu tapi pada masa yang sama kami orang-orang Cina boleh cakap apa saja tentang kamu (orang Melayu)?”

    Sebenarnya LOL tersasar.” – Helen

    HMMM,,,, WAIT A MINUTE. ISN’T THAT A RESPONSE FROM YOUR OWN AS FOLLOWS:

    “Re: “Umno behaves like ‘big boss’ because it is the Boss in BN.” Yes. So imagine for a moment that you Shamshul are a Chinese. How would you appraise your future in M’sia? — Helen”

    … AND PLEASE DON”T JUST QUOTE A PORTION OF THE COMMENT WITHOUT TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION OF THE WHOLE ARGUMENT i.e

    “Politically, Economically or Socially?

    Will it as bad as in the Malays in Singapore to PAP and the present Malays in Pulau Pinang to DAP?

    The Chinese won’t have any future at all since UMNO will remain the “Boss”?

    So what will make the Chinese happiest?

    Jaga hati dan perasaan kami wahai semua orang UMNO dan Melayu tapi pada masa yang sama kami orang-orang cina boleh cakap apa saja tentang kamu?”- LOL

    ….AND TO THAT MAY I ADD THAT YOU LATER ON RAISED THE ISSUE OF “GROWING CHINESE SENTIMENT IN THE LAST FEW DECADES”..

    ISN’T THAT AN INDIRECT ADMISSION OF THE ISSUE IN QUESTION?

    SHOULDN’T IT BE REWORDED AS “THE GROWING DAP SENTIMENT ?”

    THE BOTTOM LINE IS HELEN.. “Air Dicincang Tak Akan Putus”.

    Reply
    • 2. Helen Ang  |  June 24, 2012 at 11:04 pm

      Sorry, were we talking at cross purposes?

      I’ve just made some adjustments in the body text to the para where your comment was quoted.

      To further our discussion,

      Re: “Jaga hati dan perasaan kami (orang Cina) wahai semua orang Umno dan Melayu tapi pada masa yang sama kami orang-orang Cina boleh cakap apa saja tentang kamu (orang Melayu)?”

      One, my point is that the DAPsters – whose loud volume is hijacking the Chinese voice – can simply say any nasty thing about anyone and not just against Malays and Muslims alone.

      I’m not Malay and neither are my Hindraf friends but we’re pretty high on the DAPster hit list as their targets for fitnah and foul language (thrown at us).

      Two, “Jaga hati dan perasaan kami (orang Cina) wahai semua orang Umno dan Melayu”. Take that iconic Umno general assembly, one of those years that featured Hisham’s keris-waving performance, and some of the Melayu and Umno delegates comments telecast live which did not jaga hati.

      More specifically, instances of tak jaga hati were the Si Sepet and Si Kaki Botol slurs by the BTN deputy director and some insensitive remarks about Thaipusam and in another case Hindu prayer strings (“like dog collar” said a Malay school principal who punished Indian students for wearing them).

      “Jaga hati dan perasaan kami” – if this had been observed, then DAP would not be so popular today. The party is getting almost all the Chinese votes b’cos it is appealing to Chinese grievances.

      If there were no grievances for DAP to feed on, they would not have the political capital that is propelling them now.

      “Air dicincang tak akan putus”? If there were to be any race riots, what use would it be for me to try yelling, ‘Hey, I’m not a DAPster’ so please leave me alone.

      Reply
      • 3. fatcat  |  June 25, 2012 at 4:37 am

        Oh yes,,,”jaga hati dan perasaan” also include the unnecessary proclamation of “ketuanan”. In the past, Chinese have generally supported the government of the day for they are practical, and being able to make a good living in a safe, convenient and fair environment will suffice, However, due to the antics and rhetoric of politicians, things get very murky and dangerous today.

        In any case, putting matters in the right perspective, it must be admitted also that a large segment of Malays are also against BN/UMNO. A study of the low popular votes obtained by BN at GE12 will show just that.

        Reply
      • 4. lol  |  June 25, 2012 at 3:00 pm

        fatcat Oh yes,,,”jaga hati dan perasaan” also include the unnecessary proclamation of “ketuanan”.

        Hmmm…. kalau dapat kat awak, awak pun rasanya tak kan lepaskan peluang tu.

        Reply
      • 5. fatcat  |  June 26, 2012 at 1:40 am

        lol…

        Itulah yang dimaksudkan perlu “jaga hati dan perasaan” satu sama lain. Yang bersalah bukannya satu pihak sahaja, malah kedua-dua pihak juga terlibat.

        Reply
  • 6. Joe  |  June 24, 2012 at 11:43 pm

    Francis Light was an errant tenant who refused to pay his rent. Naturally, DAPsters and assorted anglophiles will tell you differently.

    How is it that when PR promises RM 1 million per year to each constituency, it doesn’t count as vote buying? Unless, of course, the funds are not intended to go beyond the pockets of the various ADUNs…

    Reply
  • 7. OverseasBumi  |  June 25, 2012 at 1:34 am

    Is Haris Ibrahim wearing his pyjamas in the video? He looks like he just woke up — he is so unkempt. He has a face made for radio. Obviously his face isn’t photogenic enough to go on mainstream media, hence the need to appear online with the ‘alternative media’.

    Why does he remind me of an uglier version of Samuel L. Jackson, minus the acting talent? Must be his dark skin and flaring nostrils.

    Speaking of inappropriate attire, read this:

    http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2012/06/24/student-in-yellow-nabbed-at-najib-function/

    He’s just a kid. Why is he trying to create controversy? Who put him up to this?

    This is how US police treat students who protest. They pepper-spray them in the face: [YouTube]

    In UK, they charge the students using horses: [YouTube]

    I commend our plain clothes polices for being in control of the situation. They must have exercised a lot of restraint. The kid deserves a “TBH” (i.e. he deserves to make intimate contact with the side-walk at high — nay terminal — velocity).

    Reply
  • 8. MalaysianinNewYork  |  June 25, 2012 at 8:34 am

    LOL, if you have been long enough in this blog, you would know what Shamsul represents. Shamsul is our own mini UMNO in this blog, we accept him and embrace his thoughts to widen an UMNO perspective that he is keen on enhancing. Saying that, at least he is genuine in his thoughts and how he feels which I don’t feel is wrong.

    Now coming back to your comment, the thing I can’t stand is a double headed snake which most Malaysians are, and now further propelled by the DAPsters to shoot down the messengers rather than tackling the issues that effects Malaysian per se. Like what Helen says, “I’m not Malay and neither are my Hindraf friends but we’re pretty high on the DAPster hit list as their targets for fitnah and foul language (thrown at us)”.

    The question here is it does not matter whether it is Malay or the others but Malaysians amongst us to digest rather than digress whenever truth and reality for the masses are brought forward for flavoring the political agenda whether it is BN or PR.

    LOL, I am sure you don’t take us malaysian to be suckers just because you have Facebook, Twitter and convoluted alternative medias to propaganda oppositions views as it takes much more than that to change the landscape of the Malaysian politics.

    I think in Malaysia, it is no more a factor of Malays, Chinese, Indian or lain-lain, but how we are kept drawn apart by the politicians. Every race should have its place under the sun in Malaysia if people like us can understand and accept humanity amongst us is the prevailing factor to ensure that any governance whether it is BN/PR toes the line according to the wish of the masses irrespective of the origin.

    Why do we always turn everything into politics with a tit for tat attitude unless we are all the double headed snake who can goyang goyang our kepala as long it serves our own individual need without a concern for the rest who thrive and long to live amongst us.

    Celaka punya England kalah lagi.

    Reply
    • 9. OverseasBumi  |  June 25, 2012 at 11:39 am

      Love that England lost. Teaches those Anglophiles a lesson that outside their Anglo world, there are so many countries that are better!

      Reply
      • 10. hitokiri1989  |  June 25, 2012 at 4:55 pm

        Anglophiles really are an annoying bunch. When talking about the teams they only talk about players who play in England. Really annoying when it comes to Spain especially.

        Reply
    • 11. lol  |  June 25, 2012 at 2:37 pm

      Meaning that to be in this BLOG I have to agree with you all of the time?

      Reply
    • 12. lol  |  June 25, 2012 at 2:50 pm

      and on that may I quote Helen “Just because I am not a fan of Coke doesn’t mean I am a fan of Pepsi” or something to that effect. That is how long I have been following this blog fyi.

      Please do not assume….
      __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

      Thanks for your support. I was stressed yesterday. Today’s posting (just up) explains why, and what ‘they’ have been trying to do to me. — Helen

      Reply
      • 13. LOL  |  June 26, 2012 at 1:56 am

        1. “The aim of an argument or discussion should not be victory, but progress” Joseph Joubert, 1754- 1842; a French moralist and essayist, famous for his Pensées or random thoughts and essays on life, religion, science, ethics, and social issues,

        2. “Everybody can be great…because anybody can serve. You don’t have to have a college degree to serve. You don’t have to make your subject and verb agree to serve. You only need a heart full of grace. A soul generated by love.” ― Martin Luther King Jr.

        Frankly you have done/achieved all of that.

        Disagreement doesn’t mean that we hate each other guts, but rather a manifestation of our “true self interest” derived based on previous and present experiences and the probability of future event that may affect our stake.

        Reply

Dijemput memberi komen anda

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


My blog, my like

Helen Ang

Smell the flowers

Recent Posts

CLICK ON IMAGE TO READ

Look who got TS Muhyiddin's autograph

'Apo Kono ei Jang' in Sarah's blog

'5 Maps that will help you understand the MH17 crash' in Alizul's blog

Pengunjung

  • 4,782,576 hits

Kalender

June 2012
M T W T F S S
« May   Jul »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Feeds


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 341 other followers

%d bloggers like this: