Graf pola perkauman undi CEC oleh perwakilan DAP

January 5, 2013 at 7:16 pm 43 comments

DAP ialah syarikat Lim & Son di mana Keluarga Pertama telah menguasai parti dengan cengkaman kuku besi selama lebih 40 tahun. Kit Siang mula-mula menjadi setiausaha-agung DAP pada 1969.

Graf di bawah dilakar mengikut komposisi etnik calon-calon yang bertanding pemilihan ahli jawatankuasa eksekutif DAP.

Paksi x menyenaraikan kedudukan 63 calon yang bersaing dan paksi y menunjukkan jumlah undi yang diperolehi mereka.

DAPrankingsCEC

Boleh dilihat bahawa calon-calon Cina yang mendapat undi paling tinggi serta wujudnya jurang di antara kepopularan calon Cina berbanding calon bukan Cina.

Tangga dari 30 ke 63 kebanyakannya dipenuhi calon Melayu dan calon keturunan India. Hanya Karpal Singh dan anaknya Gobind sahaja terkecuali daripada pola umum ini.

Satu-satunya pribumi bukan Islam yang bergelar Leon Jimat Donald telah mendapat 99 undi.

Kit Siang menduduki tempat teratas dengan 1,607 undi, Guan Eng (1,576) dan Karpal (1,411).

Apa yang berubah?

JomUbahMascotSebelum penyusunan semula, seorang calon Melayu menduduki tempat tercorot dengan 28 undi. Selepas keputusan di-‘Ubah’ atas sebab kesilapan teknikal, kononnya, seorang calon Cina buta Wong Sai Hoong diletakkan di tangga penghabisan dengan 23 undi.

Seorang lagi Cina yang malang jatuh tangga juga. Pada awalnya beliau dikatakan memperolehi 407 undi tetapi sekarang dikatakan hanya memegang undi segenggam (40). Waima Tan Boon Peng ini dihantar untuk menemani rakan-rakan Melayu dan India di bottom half.

Keputusan baru pemilihan CEC hasil daripada dayausaha ‘Ubah’ ini telah berjaya memberi muka sedikit kepada kaum Melayu. Di samping Zairil yang melompat dari tangga ke-40 terus masuk Top 20, dua tiga orang Melayu lain yang bertuah telah dinaik-taraf beberapa takuk juga.

DAPnegeriCEC

Lim & Co

Pada lazimnya DAP melantik para kroni anak-beranak Lim untuk menduduki CEC (lihat jadual) mengikut rumusan Buy 2 Get 1 Free. Perwakilan memilih 20 orang ahli CEC melalui undi manakala Tokong melantik 10 orang lagi.

Jadual di atas menunjukkan ahli-ahli CEC mengikut pecahan negeri selepas pindaan dibuat kepada kedudukan Zairil Khir Johari dan Vincent Wu.

MCAdapP

Jongkang-jongkit

Nasib untung rugi DAP dan MCA semestinya berkait rapat dan saling mempengaruhi. Sepertimana yang dipaparkan dalam jadual keputusan pilihanraya umum, apabila prestasi DAP naik, prestasi MCA pasti akan turun, dan sebaliknya.

Pada masa kini DAP sedang berada di atas. Untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor yang menenggelamkan MCA ke dasar laut, sila baca di sini.

Nota kaki:

1. Lim Kit Siang (1,607)
2. Lim Guan Eng (1,576)
3. Karpal Singh (1,411)
4. Chong Chieng Jen (1,211)
5. Anthony Loke (1,202)
6. Tan Kok Wai (1,199)
7. Gobind Singh Deo (1,197)
8. Tony Pua (1,162)
9. Teng Chang Khim (1,152)
10. Fong Kui Lun (1,137)
11. Nga Kor Ming (1,075)
12. Chong Eng (1,006)
13. Chow Kon Yeow (986)
14. Liew Chin Tong (984)
15. M. Kulasegaran (984)
16. Boo Cheng Hau (958)
17. Teresa Kok (925)
18. Teo Nie Ching (903)
19. Ngeh Koo Ham (824)
20. Zairil Khir Johari (803)
21. Tan Seng Giaw (802)
22. Sivakumar a/l Varatharaju (792)
23. Ronnie Liu (761)
24. Wong Sze Phin @ Jimmy (761)
25. P. Ramasamy (746)
26. Vincent Wu Him Ven (669)
27. Ean Yong Hian Wah (644)
28. Thomas Su (585)
29. Leong Ngah Ngah (571)
30. Jeff Ooi (460)
31. Lim Lip Eng (448)
32. Ganabatirau a/l Veraman (411)
33. Ng Wei Aik (407)
34. Khoo Poay Tiong (353)
35. Sivasubramaniam a/l Athinarayanan (353)
36. Ariffin S M Omar (348)
37. Ahmad Bin Ton (347)
38. Manogaran a/l Marimuthu (305)
39. Zulkifli Mohd Noor (249)
40. Jagdeep Singh Deo (227)
41. Manoharan Malayalam (216)
42. Apalasamy a/l Jataliah (212)
43. Teh Yee Cheu (197)
44. John Fernandez (187)
45. Hiew King Cheu (171)
46. Tanasekharan s/o Autherapady (171)
47. R. S. N. Rayer (169)
48. Soh Boon Hong (158)
49. Letchimanan a/l Thatharan (150)
50. Tan Lee Koon (131)
51. Tengku Zulpuri Shah Raja Puji (121)
52. Sivanesan s/o Achalingam (112)
53. Lee Guan Aik (103)
54. Kamache a/p Doray Rajoo (102)
55. Leon Jimat Donald (99)
56. Solaiman Syed Ibrahim (98)
57. Siow Kim Leong (74)
58. Gnanaguru a/l Ganisan (69)
59. Roseli Abdul Gani (69)
60. Tan Boon Peng (40)
61. Ng Chin Tsai (39)
62. Harun Ahmad (28)
63. Wong Sai Hoong (23)
.

Menarik diri.

64. Choong Siew Onn
65. Er Teck Hwa
66. Jaya Balan a/l Valliappan
67. Teo Kok Seong
68. Violet Yong
About these ads

Entry filed under: DAP. Tags: , .

“MCA can deliver” what, pray tell Aktivis Taman Kaya bergiat di Jerusubang

43 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Waris Malaya  |  January 5, 2013 at 8:26 pm

    This is further evidence of #DAPsterCancer, really.

    Reply
  • 2. forrrestcat  |  January 5, 2013 at 8:32 pm

    Even North Korea at least does not pretend to be a democracy. Here we have a dictatorial dynasty in a party aspiring to become the Christian Caliphate yet unable to count votes from 1800 delegates. IMO, the CEC nomination must be done a second time, the current CEC are dubiously elected, tainted and CORRUPTED. Where is that Ambiga with her dog tag given by the White House to whip DAP to become Bersih?

    After they ascend to power, it will all drug wars, wars between political dynsasties like in Phillipines, the closest example of a successful Christian country in ASEAN that it is proudly called the Sick Man of Asia, have the suicidal audacity to challenge China militarily and harbors intention to retake Sabah to pillage its resources.

    Reply
  • 3. Antihipokrit  |  January 5, 2013 at 8:34 pm

    Apalah lawak DAP. Baru 2000 undi tak boleh handle. DAP tak layak mengkritik SPR. Sendiri punya parti pun mau tipu… CAT hancing la tokong..

    Reply
    • 4. Waris Malaya  |  January 5, 2013 at 9:20 pm

      CAT = pussy; SELCAT = jual pussy

      Kalau tak percaya boleh tanya Ronnie Liu… #DAPsterCancer

      Reply
  • 5. Antihipokrit  |  January 5, 2013 at 8:37 pm

    Gua harap lu tokong sama ambiga arrange demo BERSIH kasi demo depan HQ DAP.

    Reply
  • 6. oviruses65@kiyaijr.com  |  January 5, 2013 at 9:06 pm

    Reblogged this on Oviruses 65.

    Reply
  • 7. Warrior 231 aka ahlulbait  |  January 5, 2013 at 9:14 pm

    Even if you can accept the rebalancing exercise as something valid, it cannot erase certain realities for massaged stats will still retain a faint veneer of falsehood no matter how vigorous was the manipulative buffing. and pray what are they?

    1. 12 of 33 candidates from no 31-63 were Chingks which means non-Chingks constituted 64% of the rest.

    2. contrast (1) above with the other edifying reality that of the 30 top ranked candidates only,5 (minus the celup pisang, of course) were non-Chingkies In other words, 83% or 25 of the top ranked 30 were Chingkies.

    3. Of the 5 disgusting choc-ice arselickers in the top 30, none were of a shade lighter than black or brown Uncle Toms..

    The data is also especially significant for another reason often overlooked in the brouhaha over the non-existence of a genuine Malay in the final CEC .

    It shows there is no place in the Chingkie racist supremacist scheme of things that even Non-Muslims pribumis are to be left on the wayside as untrustworthy collateral damage. It puts to rest for good the debate as to whether the DAP is a multiracial party for indeed its is NOT and will NEVER EVER be.

    In simple speak, no bumiputera (Muslim or Non-Muslim) is deserving of a place by merit on the Chingkie dining table. They only get there as appointed lackeys who are not supposed to raise a pipsqueak about the Chingkie racist agenda.

    The results were of no surprise or shock to me. In fact, I had outrun hindsight a long time ago with my astute observation that the Chingkies were in essence gunning for political supremacy in order to implement their supremacist and anti-Islam agenda. This to be done by piggybacking on supposed Bumiputera disaffection with BN, cultivating ties with power crazy pseudo-mullahs and Wahhabi liberals, wielding the pennants of corruption, inequality, injustice to mask their (chingkie) nefarious agenda and corralling Christian support through anti-Islam verbiage and raising non-existent spectres of Malay-Muslim machinations to establish total hegemony over the Non-Muslims.

    http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2012/09/15/my-take-its-time-for-islamophobic-evangelicals-to-choose/

    It is an agenda cobbled together in the shoplots of this land, shoplots that hide from view fiery anti Malay/Pribumi and anti-Islam bible thumping rhetoric, shoplots that shield underhanded plotting by conspirators clothed in Christ’s garb but wielding Satan’s scepter and shoplots that house the failures, angst ridden losers in life. Yeah, shoplots that serve as refuge for plotting, angst-driven, inferiority complexed Chingkie and Hindulen losers who have an axe to grind that emerging paradigms, helmed by Pribumis bent on reclaiming their rightful place as ‘maruahful’ indigenous inheritors of this land, are fast despatching their (Chingkie) dishonest, moneylaundering, cheating, counterfeiting and thieving “fools paradises” into the dustbins of history. And its being funded and directed from a place of south of Johore with tacit support from Fifth Columnist sympathisers in Beijing.

    Muslim and Non-Muslim Pribumis alike; you have been forewarned of the looming silhoutte of the sliteyed, unwashed arsed yellow devil and you ignore it at your own peril..
    ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    re: “Chingkie” … don’t forget, I’m Chinese. — Helen

    Reply
    • 8. forrrestcat  |  January 6, 2013 at 12:09 am

      I am familiar with warrior 321, he is not shy hiding his anti chinese beliefs but he is brilliant with statistics, i think he has economics background. You have just attracted a heavyweight commentator in the Malaysia blogosphere, he may annoy you with his anti chinese rhetoric but his comments are more valuable than an ocean of DAPSter spit. I always think him as a shuzheng of the Malays.

      Reply
    • 9. binhamsin1 (@binhamsin1)  |  January 7, 2013 at 3:33 pm

      woahhhh…. warrior 321 is here!! take a bow Helen, your blog is on the hotlist!

      Reply
  • 10. kiasu  |  January 5, 2013 at 10:03 pm

    Saya rasa dalam membuat analisis seperti di atas, Cik Helen kekalkan sahaja lah Data Undi yang asal untuk selama2nya dan ignore terus Data Pindaan yang Haram itu.

    Saya kata data pindaan itu haram kerana belum dibuat proses audit yang proper dan profesional. Haram kerana kertas2 undi tidak dikira semula. Adakah kertas2 undi sudah dihapuskan untuk memadam segala penipuan? Dalam masa 2-3 minggu itu, segalanya bisa diatur. Perletakan jawatan oleh si polan cuma wayang cina atau drama melayu.

    Data pindaan itu haram, mengapa kita mesti ikut pakai data penipuan oleh Tokong itu. Tentu DAP marah dan meradang jika kita semua gunapakai data asal dan tidak ambil indah data tipu. Kalau Helen pakai data pindaan, Tokong sudah tentu suka hal ini.

    Kalau lepas sehari Tokong sudah tahu (memang tahu pun, sebab dia yang boss kepada penipuan manipulasi bodoh ini) akan kesilapan kononnya, mengapa tidak immediately jawatankuasa pemilihan audit or kira semula setiap kertas undi. Cuma 2000 delegates, bukannya 13 juta pengundi pun! Tidakkah ini amat pelik dan mencurigakan.

    Kita seharusnya terus pakai Data Asal yang menampakkan penolakan mutlak parti chauvinis cina terhadap ahli melayu, india, sabah sarawak. Who is Tokong to verify the votes kerana dia adalah one of the candidates.

    Contohnya, kalau Najib yang bertanding dalam PRU13 dan BN menang besar, tetapi selepas 3 minggu Najib juga yang umumkan bahawa sebenarnya ada kesilapan oleh Komputer Cap Udang buatan Malaysia, bahawa sebenarnya PR yang menang besar dan tak perlulah SPRM atau United Nations kira balik atau odit semua undi, ya sudah tentu semua akan menuduh bahawa Najib telah menipu….eh, eh silap tu, sudah tentu Tokong dan rakan2 akan menerima keputusan mereka menang itu tanpa banyak soal.

    Nah, bukankah Data Pindaan itu hanyalah mainan pembohongan DAP. Apapun, ini cuma pandangan nakal saya dan semestinya saya sokong analisis Cik Helen yang jelas menerjah tepat ke muka Tokong.
    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Gimme a minute. I’ll show the amended votes. — Helen

    Reply
    • 11. Helen Ang  |  January 5, 2013 at 10:48 pm

      Begitu menarik sekali apakala kita mengkaji data dengan lebih terperinci. Nampaknya betul lah tertonjol sindrom Cina Buta.

      (A) Rugi banyak

      Vincent Wu Him Ven lama 1,202 baru 669

      Wong Sai Hoong lama 448 baru 23

      Tan Boon Peng lama 407 baru 40

      (B) Rugi sederhana

      Jimmy Wong Sze Pin lama 761 baru 643

      (C) Untung sedikit

      Roseli Abdul Gani lama 39 baru 69

      Zulkifli Mohd Noor lama 216 baru 249

      (D) Untung banyak

      Zairil lama 305 baru 803

      Adakah ia hanya secara kebetulan yang pindaan menaikkan Melayu semuanya? Satu langkah damage control?

      Saya nampak bahawa kesilapan penggandaan memang berlaku. Namun we only have their word for it yang undi bagi Zairil itu ada perbezaan kira-kira 500.

      Ramai yang mencurigai pindaan memberikan Zairil tambahan undi hampir 500 ini kecuali DAP sanggup tunjukkan kertas undi sebagai bukti.

      Dari segi graf, sekiranya dilakarkan mengikut keputusan pra-Ubah, maka lagi berat sebelah kelihatannya. Tiada seorang calon Melayu pun menduduki tangga 1-34 iaitu kedudukan top half.

      Reply
      • 12. Helen Ang  |  January 5, 2013 at 11:12 pm

        Dr Novandri has a scan of the result sheet — here.

        Reply
        • 13. kiasu  |  January 6, 2013 at 12:07 am

          Just snipped at the result sheet.

          Whoa, the malay and non-chinese candidates must also be identified in Nama (Cina) to vie for DAP election. Like dat aar for a malaysian malaysian multi-racial party – some malaysian citizen DAP delegates only know chinese language, like dat?

          Reply
      • 14. kiasu  |  January 6, 2013 at 12:48 am

        DAP kata mahu kebih perjuangkan hak kaum wanita (termasuk Cik Helen lah). Jika benar begitu kononnya, sudah tentu perlu ada tambahan ketara kaum hawa dalam CEC data haram itu. Ada ke?

        Sebab saya tak tahu bezakan lelaki / wanita daripada nama2 cina, kecuali ada teresa, helen, anita seperti itu.

        Dan, ada ke wanita melayu dalam CEC untuk memperjuangkan wanita golongan majoriti? Wanita bernama Zairil mungkin, atau Nurul Huda? Maaf Nurul, kembar anda telah menaikkan nama negara di suatu masa tidak lama dahulu.

        Reply
        • 15. Helen Ang  |  January 6, 2013 at 12:54 am

          Ada 3 orang wanita dalam CEC DAP: Teresa, Chong Eng dan Teo Nie Ching.

          Reply
  • 16. calvinsankaran  |  January 5, 2013 at 10:08 pm

    Folks, my latest letter has been published by FMT and it happens to be about our favourite subject – the Lim & Anak Sdn Bhd. I would like to thank Helen and the regulars here for inspiration and source material.

    http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2013/01/05/dap-talibans-without-turbans/

    Reply
    • 17. Helen Ang  |  January 5, 2013 at 10:14 pm

      Hi Calvin,

      I’ve seen the perpetual hysteria break out among the DAPsters there. I’d like to put up tomorrow (as our topic of discussion) the behaviour of ‘those’ people.

      In the meantime, can you have a look at http://harismibrahim.wordpress.com/2013/01/02/ban-ellese-you-decide

      Reply
      • 18. calvinsankaran  |  January 5, 2013 at 10:30 pm

        Typical of these morons – they think freedom of expression only applies to them and their opponents have no rights whatsover. This fellow Haris has the cheek to advocate freedom of expression but call to boycott newspapers. He wants clean politics and political freedom but start this idiotic ABU campaign. When Anas disagreed, he pounced and hammered him.

        Reply
      • 19. forrrestcat  |  January 6, 2013 at 12:33 am

        The way they heckle at Ellesse is shocking. God bless her soul.

        Reply
        • 20. Pakatan Puak Pembohong  |  January 6, 2013 at 9:48 am

          the Dapsters are the mob of social media. not shocking at all. they are paid 50 cents per comment. that’s how they make a living. that’s how they get by. thanks to social media, they now have a job. a job of smearing people. I call them the 50 cent brigade. we also have them over here. Mohd Aziz, sshsn, Ravin etc.

          Reply
          • 21. Kpee,Kpanjang  |  January 7, 2013 at 3:44 pm

            on helen’s blog only 25 sen ……….. :)

            Reply
  • 22. kiasu  |  January 5, 2013 at 10:15 pm

    20.Zairil Khee Joh, 803
    21. Tan Seng Giaw, 802

    Boleh percaya ke Heavyweight Tan Seng Giaw ko-ed by mere 1 vote by blue-eye 500-plus Zairil boy?

    Ini kira sudah doa KO by PAS…mujarab

    Reply
    • 23. calvinsankaran  |  January 5, 2013 at 10:31 pm

      It doesn’t matter if it makes sense since in DAP, common sense and truth are what uttered by Lim & Anak. Just like in PAS, Islam is what is intepreted by their Taliban leaders.

      Reply
  • 24. calvinsankaran  |  January 5, 2013 at 10:21 pm

    Finally the Star has woken up from its slumber and took DAP to the cleaners with its scathing coverage of the rigging of its election.

    I think many people missed the real issue: the mechanism of election. In the real elections, all votes are verified in front of candidates and/or their agents so it is correct and transparent. This is what happens even in the GE where there are thousands or even tens of thousands of voters. Yet even with 1800 delegates, DAP didn’t follow this simple method and made the counting secret and done by some cronies appointed by the Dear Leader.

    WIth such mechanism,how can one even verify if what they are saying is true since there is no independent and transparent verification and there is no security in the chain of custody.

    That the whole thing makes no sense only shows that DAP is so bad that it doesnt even know how to lie or cover up convincingly.

    I can tell you that even the school hobby club elections are better managed and more transparent than DAP’s.

    I wonder if Ambiga and her merry thugs will take the streets for BERSIH 4.0 in front of KOMTAR.

    Reply
    • 25. kiasu  |  January 5, 2013 at 11:50 pm

      “DAP didn’t follow this simple method and made the counting secret and done by some cronies appointed by the Dear Leader.”

      – if the above allegation is true….then the Ambiga Bersih thing they are propagating is ABSOLUTE SAMPAH and LONGKANG.

      Reply
  • 26. azhar  |  January 5, 2013 at 11:26 pm

    dap dah buat lawak bodoh.

    Reply
  • 27. mubarakchan  |  January 6, 2013 at 12:05 am

    The DAP with its recent fiasco in counting pieces of paper wants to ape Lee Kuan Yew with his starred Double First Law degree from the University of Cambridge and one man over 50 year ruler of Singapore which is a runaway failure because of his failed policies compared with the runaway success of Malaysia over the same period. During this time, Malaysia had 6 democratically elected Prime Ministers. The Hare and the Tortoise ?

    Reply
  • 28. Antihipokrit  |  January 6, 2013 at 12:17 am

    DAP akan jadi LEBIH penipu jika mereka mentadbir negara. DAP menggali kubur sendiri di kala GE 13 semakin hampir. Hanya lembu PAS shj yg percaya 100% apa kata KHALIFAH.

    Reply
  • 29. shamshul anuar  |  January 6, 2013 at 12:25 am

    Helen,

    they say the “proof of pudding is in the eating”. and wise men also say “pot calling a kettle black’.

    The DAP election blunder fits the messages very well. DAP for all of can see loves to to appoint itself as a standard bearer. It adopts a high moral ground. But limited to chastising other parties, namely UMNO.

    What is so difficult in conducting an election for 1000 odds members. Cant be that difficult. I mean I believe I can manage the election results. No need for auditors. What needed are ability to understand ,mathematics and a good system. And good attitude of rechecking to detect any mistake.

    Imagine the uproar if that blunder took place in UMNO General assembly. Kit Siang would not waste time top call Najib to step down as President of UMNO and PM for “inabilty to conduct a fair election”.

    And why is it that the choice of executive is limited to 20 CEC and the tokong having 10 extra votes. Why cant the delegates votes the the highest post. Would not that be more democrratic.

    Reply
  • 30. forrrestcat  |  January 6, 2013 at 12:27 am

    Lim Guan Eng dares to Ubah Rocket Style the CEC because he knows he has millions if fanatical supporters and blind PASster Wahhabis who would spin the CEC vote revision as another crusade of Truth. He is sleeeping soundly like a baby on Rainbow’ bosom.

    Reply
  • 31. Lim Tat  |  January 6, 2013 at 3:29 am

    Lim & Son – Pemimpin Anugerah Tuhan tu. Murshidul Am LOL. Eh, takde ke orang asli join DAP? *grab popcorn, sit in the corner and watch Pua Chu Kang*

    Reply
    • 32. Helen Ang  |  January 6, 2013 at 8:36 am

      Ada. Namanya Bah Tony tetapi beliau tidak mampu bertahan lebih setahun. Meninggalkan DAP hanya selepas satu tahun menyertai parti.

      “Bah Tony bukan ahli politik licik macam Ngeh dan Nga. Dia hanya ada sebuah kereta Kancil. Seorang peguam dan bekas Eksekutif bank hanya pakai kereta Kancil..bukan macam Ngeh dan Nga yang bukan saja mendapat ribuan ringgit dari elaun Wakil Rakyat malah mendapat elaun Pengarah beberapa buah syarikat. Tony lebih dikenali sebagai aktivis masyarakat berbanding ahli politik.”

      http://mediaperak.net/2012/10/17/krisis-dap-perak-bah-tony-keluar-parti/

      Reply
      • 33. Lim Tat  |  January 6, 2013 at 7:59 pm

        Thanks for that info. I only knew Tony Pua (our own version of Pua Chu Kang Pte Ltd actor while Singaporean prefer that original Phua)

        Reply
  • 34. Monyet King  |  January 6, 2013 at 10:00 am

    Helen, you have a wicked sense of humor. LOL

    Reply
    • 35. Helen Ang  |  January 6, 2013 at 10:06 am

      And you be my monkey’s uncle. We belong to the same troop ,)

      Reply
  • 36. anakjamil  |  January 6, 2013 at 10:39 am

    they should have called CEC as Convenient Election Committee, cos that’s sure feels and look like it. Should there be more dispute, as there are far more evangelistas, they will ubah again until it look wholesome. Perhaps this time, instead of blaming the spreadsheet, they can blame the computer or the ink or the furnitures or UMNO..

    Ahhh..pei ngor chin, everything sap sap suey!

    Reply
    • 37. Helen Ang  |  January 6, 2013 at 11:07 am

      Setuju. Semua salah Umno ni. Tulah kerajaan tak ajar komputer dengan betul waktu di bangku sekolah.

      Jom Ubah Roket Stail

      Reply
      • 38. The International Jew  |  January 6, 2013 at 12:31 pm

        they see UMNO agents everywhere. maybe next time, they can conduct their CEC elections behind closed doors. no reporters. no journalists. better yet, no elections. just elect themselves. they talk about democracy. of the people, by the people, for the people. for their CEC elections, of the CEC, by the CEC, for the CEC. then they can finally make the transition from Democratic Action Party to Dictatorial Action Party.
        _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

        CEC run by CEO. — Helen

        Reply
    • 39. organic  |  January 8, 2013 at 9:51 pm

      they can even blame the furnitures?..he..he

      Reply
  • 40. I.D.A  |  January 7, 2013 at 1:53 pm

    haha tak tahan – jawatan dlm parti khalifah.

    Reply
  • 41. tsyhll  |  January 7, 2013 at 2:39 pm

    I wonder if tomorrow Karpal kaput, will Gobind be able to carry his own weight?

    Reply
  • 42. I.D.A  |  January 7, 2013 at 3:18 pm

    Guano Mu Ni

    [Jaja terus
    SPRM jerlus
    tidak telus...,]

    Guano mu ni
    undi sendiri
    kirapun, tak reti…

    Entah apa lagi;
    udang sebalik mi
    keluar juga nanti.

    07-01-2013

    Reply
  • 43. 1812  |  January 8, 2013 at 11:44 pm

    Since there is so much controversy surrounding the DAP elections and no one is above the law which is under the purview of the Registrar of Societies, let the Registrar being an independent person reviews this DAP elections which I believe might not have qualified auditors, lawyers or professionals to monitor or scrutinize the fiasco. Because one day, the DAP could be ruling over all of us.
    ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Dat vat you get when a failed accountant presides over the proceedings. — Helen

    Reply

Dijemput memberi komen anda

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


My blog, my like

Helen Ang

Smell the flowers

Recent Posts

CLICK ON IMAGE TO READ

Look who got TS Muhyiddin's autograph

'Apo Kono ei Jang' in Sarah's blog

'5 Maps that will help you understand the MH17 crash' in Alizul's blog

Pengunjung

  • 4,684,450 hits

Kalender

Archives

Feeds


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 341 other followers

%d bloggers like this: