Kes Dr Novandri dan blogger-blogger pro-Umno

January 9, 2013 at 2:12 pm 9 comments

Blog Haris Ibrahim hari ini memuatkan tajuk ‘When will they ever stop lying?‘ (sudah 22 komen, klik sini)

Petikan posting di blog Haris:

“Just who is this blogger, Dr Novandri Hasan Basri? [...]

“Remember the false accusations of sexual harassment made against YAB Lim Guan Eng’s son previously? This Dr Novandri Hasan Basri was involved in defaming him too. It was reported that he had claimed that the Penang Chief Minister’s son had assaulted a 16-year-old schoolmate and tried to escape punishment by using his father’s name.”

Blogger-blogger Umno dibayangkan sebagai selalu membohong bukan sahaja oleh blog Haris tetapi oleh Chua Soi Lek dan akhbarnya The Star juga.

Seterusnya blog Haris memberi satu contoh pembohongan yang dirujuk tadi:

“Later it was established that a girl whose photograph was used was identified as 21-year-old chess Grandmaster Anya Sun Corke, who represents England in chess, has no ties with Penang and has never been a classmate of Lim’s son as alleged. They took her picture from a website, deleted the chessboard and then claimed that this was the girl Lim Guan Eng’s son was supposed to have assaulted.”

Laporan-laporan The Star berkenaan isu anak Guan Eng:

The Star melaporkan Tony Pua sebagai berkata blogger-blogger yang terbabit bermain “politik tahap longkang” manakala Lim Kit Siang dipetik sebagai “describing the bloggers’ lies as diabolical and heinous”.

Guan Eng: “My son wanted to go to SXI because he did not want to have his hair crew-cut as is required for Heng Ee students, but wanted to keep his hair longer.”

[Wakakaka. Budak lelaki 'prefect' kononnya keluar sekolah kerana hendak menyimpan rambut] - The Star (18 Okt 2011) melapor alasan yang telah disuarakan bapanya.

The Star melaporkan guru besar SMJK Heng Ee sebagai berkata anak Guan Eng – seorang pengawas sekolah – telah dipindahkan keluar pada 3 Jan 2011 atas keputusan remaja itu sendiri.

Seperti biasa, liputan berat sebelah berita The Star di atas ada menemurah orang DAP tetapi tidak pula mewawancara blogger-blogger pro-Umno yang telah dicerca itu agar berlaku adil.

Dan tidak pula dilaporkan bahawa pada 24 Feb 2011, Dewan Peniagaan Cina Pulau Pinang yang diterajui Tan Sri Tan Kok Ping telah menyalurkan sumbangan sebanyak RM2 juta kepada sekolah Heng Ee.

Dewan peniagaan memberi sumbangan RM2 juta kepada sekolah anak Guan Eng

Dewan peniagaan memberi sumbangan RM2j kepada sekolah anak Guan Eng

Mesranya Tan Kok Ping dengan Lim Guan Eng

Mesranya Tan Kok Ping dengan Lim Guan Eng

Si Gunting dalam Lipatan

Bukan sahaja akhbar milik MCA itu enggan membuat sedikit investigative reporting tetapi ia menimbus cerita.

(1) Presiden Dewan Peniagaan Cina Pulau Pinang Tan Sri Tan Kok Ping dikenali sebagai seorang ahli korporat yang amat rapat dengan Guan Eng. Adakah blogger-blogger pro-Umno di Pulau Pinang yang cuba mengorek cerita tentang Tan Kok Ping harus dipandang keji dan “tidak beretika”?

Atau ia wartawan-wartawan The Star sebenarnya yang harus dianggap malas membuat kerja? Ataupun ada udang di sebalik batu?

(2) Timbalan presiden Dewan Peniagaan Cina Pulau Pinang, iaitu Datuk Loh Geok Beng, ialah seorang pemaju hartanah yang syarikatnya dipanggil Wabina Construction & Engineering. Wabina ialah kontraktor utama yang memajukan rumah-rumah mewah di tapak Kg Buah Pala. The Star tidak memaklumkan kaitan ini kepada para pembacanya.

Ask the villagers of Kg Buah Pala if Guan Eng had put people before profits

Tapak Kg Buah Pala dimajukan oleh syarikat milik timbalan presiden Dewan Peniagaan

Di Selangor pula, Meja Metro akhbar itu mempunyai 27 orang pemberita bertugas di ibupejabatnya di Phileo Damansara. Meja Metro lah yang membuat liputan di kawasan Subang Jaya.

(3) Kalau sudah ada 27 orang pemberita Metro, tidak bolehkah The Star menghantar seorang daripada mereka untuk menjenguk sekejap di Gereja City Harvest di Subang Jaya untuk bertanya tentang dakwaan ‘cuci wang’ (money laundering) RM5.2 juta (S$2.1 juta) yang ditimbulkan oleh pihak berkuasa Singapura?

(4) Dan kalau sudah ada 27 orang pemberita Metro, tidak bolehkah The Star menghantar seorang daripada mereka untuk pergi ke balai polis apabila Hannah Yeoh disoalsiasat atas dakwaan memfitnah? NST dan Malay Mail boleh ada membuat liputan.

Jadi kenapa The Star – berbanding NST dan MM, ia mempunyai berganda-ganda jumlah bilangan pemberita – yang saban hari mewartakan berita boring Star-Jerusubang bertekad tidak mahu menyediakan ruang sekiranya ia berita yang kurang elok tentang politikus evangelis DAP 2.0?

Tapi senang-senang The Star menggambarkan blogger-blogger Umno sebagai penulis tahap longkang.

Tidak pernah sekalipun saya membaca apa-apa rencana yang bersifat kritis tentang politikus evangelis DAP 2.0 dalam suratkhbar tersebut.

LGEtkp8

Rakan-rakan VIP yang mempunyai banyak kabel

Lim Guan Eng has many rich and powerful friends in Penang.

Adakah wartawan-wartawan The Star merupakan ‘rakan’ Guan Eng juga?

Mungkin blogger-blogger pro-Umno ada minat untuk mengajukan soalan ini kepada orang MCA di Pulau Pinang: Adakah wartawan-wartawan The Star merupakan ‘rakan’ Guan Eng juga?

Apa jadi dengan siasatan polis ke atas kes anak Guan Eng?

pcfhair 3Semalam Guan Eng menuduh badan-badan penguatkuasa undang-undang sebagai bertindak begitu pantas atas kes yang melibatkan Pakatan tetapi sebaliknya melengah apabila kes membabitkan politikus BN – CM feels MACC only ‘swift’ when handling Pakatan cases (Malay Mail, 8 Jan 2013)

Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang itu merujuk kepada tindakan Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia ke atas seorang pembantu kepada Timbalan Ketua Menteri (I) berhubung satu kes gangguan seksual di Seberang Jaya.

Rasa-rasanya tuduhan Guan Eng mungkin tidak berapa tepat kerana SPRM pun masih belum lagi mengumumkan hasil siasatannya ke atas think-tank Guan Eng Penang Institute (Zairil CEOnya) yang didakwa telah cuba merasuah Tunku Aziz.

Dalam kes gangguan seksual di Seberang Jaya itu, wanita tersebut dikatakan telah disogok sejumlah wang supaya beliau berdiam diri. SPRM telah berjaya mencekup seorang pembantu kepada Timbalan Ketua Menteri (I) Pulau Pinang yang didakwa terbabit.

Kita belum mengetahui apa dia kesudahan siasatan polis ke atas dakwaan kes gangguan seksual kononnya berlaku di SMJK Heng Ee. Adakah fail polis itu sudah ditutup?

Berkaitan:

Apalah lu Umno ‘bohong’, ‘binatang buas’ dan ‘bajingan’

About these ads

Entry filed under: Gunting Dalam Lipatan. Tags: , , , .

Kalimah Allah: Melayu dianggap cetek agama Badan-badan gereja sekata mahu guna kalimah Allah

9 Comments Add your own

  • 1. I.D.A  |  January 9, 2013 at 3:43 pm

    sungguh, kalau kita ada banyak kawan yang ada kabel besar-besar kita boleh jadi ‘above the law’ – mulut boleh dizip dengan duit. itu fakta. tapi jangan lupa satu hari akan ada orang buka zip dengan duit juga… jangan lupa kalau kabel besar, renjatannya juga besar ooo…

    p.s; sat aku twit kat Dr Novandri pulak.

    Reply
  • 2. fff  |  January 9, 2013 at 6:07 pm

    Dear Hell, was there assault by his son? Would you care to check with your fellow parasites and just come clean? Its not very hard if you try.

    Reply
    • 3. forrrestcat  |  January 9, 2013 at 7:28 pm

      As usual DAPster mentality, Helen is questioning the discrepancy in LGE response to the matter and the connections he had with the school that may compromise their roles as truthful alibis. We can see that he’s hiding something.

      As for the sexual assault, well, hopefully the victim spill the beans.

      Changing schools because of hair cut, what a spoiled brat.

      I always think UMNO bloggers play at the DAPSter and Pakatan blogger levels, they have used many pictures and videos to denigrate the family members of the PM. Accusing Rosmah as murderer, accusing her of buying rm20 million ring although it is proven as not true and fabricate a Utusan article saying she saved money from childhood to buy the ring, making youtube videos showing Najib son conduct in getting drunk and so on.

      But because the DAP sheep worship the tokong, they see no wrong in LGE.

      Reply
      • 4. fff  |  January 10, 2013 at 1:45 pm

        There you go. Absolute denial from a simple question. Try harder you umno ass wipe.

        Reply
        • 5. MalaysianinNewYork  |  January 10, 2013 at 2:14 pm

          fff, you say “There you go. Absolute denial from a simple question. Try harder you umno ass wipe”. Thank you for your comment.

          The insinuation that you portray is political. Naturally your argument is going to be lets be tit for tat. Fair enough, can accept your argument. Now let me pose this question to you? We can agree to disagree whether it is an UMNO ass wipe or a PKR ass wipe? Either way both are ass wipe. Now, where do you stand in this ass wipe situation?

          Is it because your alliance is political or what is the reality? because for me both are ass wipe as how it fits their agenda. Now did just find out that UMNO is an ass wipe or you tolerated all this while until your superficial white knight in the form of dysfunctional PKR emerged courtesy of the racist HINDRAF? You don’t have to answer this question because I can understand and comprehend when one needs to speak because they have something to say and some who has to just say something.

          UMNO ass wipe or PKR ass wipe is not the issue, but people like you who ride the tide as and when it fits in. Trust me your role is minimal, because you are a typical ass wipe that we need to get rid of for how and why the nation is in the state it is.
          ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

          “UMNO ass wipe or PKR ass wipe is not the (t)issue”? — Helen

          Reply
          • 6. MalaysianinNewYork  |  January 10, 2013 at 3:01 pm

            Helen, my last para is not personal. I have the highest regards for you and I think you are doing a gallant effort. The reason I said what I said is because you don’t have to nor need to justify your position.The ability for you to speak out without fear and favor does not need a condescending attitude from me or like minded acceptance from me. You are what you are to depict the actual picture for what it is and I do appreciate your ingenuity in addressing it. You don’t need to justify and i do apologize for being abrupt in my approach.

            Reply
            • 7. Helen Ang  |  January 10, 2013 at 3:50 pm

              I was aware you were addressing Sshsn and not addressing me.

              I made the ’tissue’ pun b’cos the wordplay amused me.

              Reply
  • 8. Sshsn  |  January 10, 2013 at 8:56 pm

    So many comments…so much spin, yet no simple answer to a simple question. Try harder will you? I’ve called you for what you are..

    Reply
  • 9. Il Wanderer  |  January 17, 2013 at 11:29 am

    question dapsters…prepare to be hurled by volleys of abuses…so much about respecting other people’s opinion.!!!

    Reply

Dijemput memberi komen anda

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


My blog, my like

Helen Ang

Smell the flowers

Recent Posts

CLICK ON IMAGE TO READ

Look who got TS Muhyiddin's autograph

'Apo Kono ei Jang' in Sarah's blog

'5 Maps that will help you understand the MH17 crash' in Alizul's blog

Pengunjung

  • 4,594,105 hits

Kalender

Archives

Feeds


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 333 other followers

%d bloggers like this: