I would hardly describe the vast percentage of netizens who rubbished the two examples above as Dapsters. Most are not even members/supporters of a political party

However it is wiser to beware those who speak softly but carry a big stick.

If thats the case, the masses would have attacked Bawani as a disruptive forum participant, instead of SZ & SW1M. That wasn’t the case.

>> And I suspect your concern for me is at least half genuine.

Sometimes, a person not on your good books plans to do something so silly & ridiculous, you have to sarcastically warn them against it. Just saying…

Thanks.

Btw helen, UR FOREHEAD is not proportionate with your ugly face.

And I suspect your concern for me is at least half genuine.

With all due respect, you underestimate the silent majority on the other side of the fence.

I’ve never denied the paper’s pro-BN content.

As I’ve explained before, the very top echelon (such as Datuk Seri-Datuk-Datuk — he as 3 titles has far as I’m aware) of the paper will naturally want to take care of their rice bowl as their remuneration package is worth millions per annum) and they would order a tailor-made content should the occasion require, like during the CSL-LGE debates.

However, the middle management and rank-and-file are pro-opposition. Why should you think that if the Chinese support overall for DAP is estimated at 85%-90%, that The Star staff should be drastically different from their family and friends and the Chinese community at large?

Um, a few weeks ago, a woman called Sharifa Zohra was at the receiving end of this silent majority. It was so much, that people like Khairy felt it was best to let her SW1M

Even companies turned the ‘Listen x1000′ meme into advertising material