We’re living in the same country (or we hold the same nationality) but do you really care to have DAPsters living next door as your neighbour?
Below is the typical DAPster behaviour.
This particular “top commenter” to my FMT article said:
- Helen Dung is a Frustrated B***h
- her followers are known as The Helenistas
- She hates Hannah Yeoh / Christians / English Educated / Articulate People
- Anyone pro-DAP/PR is a DAPster
- Visit her Blog. She has at most 10 followers
- Rejected by the MSM n Online News Portals
- a pathetic Loser, unwanted n unloved by Sane people
- badly needs a Shampoo
For the sake of my blog’s “at most 10 followers”, allow me to address this “articulate” person’s comment.
To address bullet point (1), labelling people with different opinions from them as “bitch”, “running dog”, “poodle/lapdog”, etc is almost second nature to DAPsters.
Imagine life in sembahyang dua imam Malaysia where one half of the population is perpetually calling the other half of the population ‘dogs’.
In fact, their habit of name-calling is so well-known that it has become an element of parody. e.g. how one reader ‘BeggarPariahDog’ takes the mickey out of the opposition supporters (my same FMT article was aggregated in Malaysia Today, screenshot below)
For saying that he/she “enjoys reading Helen Ang”, the M2day reader got the anticipated shelling. ‘BeggarPariahDog’ was told by another reader (my guess: possibly an Indian going by the pseudonym ‘Sahadewa’) that he/she is a traitor to his/her race.
For the sin of liking my writing, this poor chap/lady was also told that “the local council will shoot rabid Pariah dogs”. The ‘kafir-mengkafir’ syndrome has descended to this level of openly expressed hostility — shooting rabid pariah dogs.
I’ve used the phrase ‘Christianized Indians’ in the title because I do not know if these Indians are Christians or not. Therefore, ‘Christianized’ refers to Anglophile background rather than their religion per se.
The Facebook identity that they’ve chosen are the Cannosian Convent (see Rk Sandhu above) and Penang Free School (Inderjit above) network. Recall that the Penang chief minister comes from a
missionary mission school background too.
To address bullet point (3), see also my earlier posting ‘If you win the election, then you change the law, lah‘ where I noted that MCLM was launched in London on 30 Oct 2010, and its then president Haris Ibrahim had given a ringing endorsement to Hannah Yeoh.
The ABU campaign essentially makes out Umno to be “evil” and the party’s opponents are therefore the opposite of evil, i.e. good. Aside from extolling Hannah’s goodness, Haris goes as far as to testify to her being “excellent candidate material”.
How can we measure Hannah’s sainthood? That’s hard to quantify even for Haris Ibrahim. What can be measured are countable units like days, hours, minutes.
MCLM had invited Hannah Yeoh to speak at their forum in London on 22 Nov 2010.
At around the same period, Hannah absented herself from the Selangor state assembly for six consecutive sittings from Nov 8 to Nov 15, 2010 (attendance record in Hansard, here).
Haris seems to have invented some sort of ‘integrity meter‘ by which he’s measured Hannah Yeoh and is satisfied that she passed the test with flying colours.
But this “excellent candidate material” receiving the MCLM stamp of approval only attended 7 days out of the total 13 days of the Selangor 2010 assembly. Days are something that we can count unlike the intangible ‘integrity’ that is Haris’ yardstick.
Hannah’s attendance at the Selangor DUN in 2010 was FAIL as she had rather spend her time in London than at the seat of government in Shah Alam.
So what are the numerical units in the gadget that DAPsters use to measure their politicians?
An Anglophile Indian calling himself ‘Toffee’ had appraised Uthaya as “Najib’s stooge”. Again, DAPsters appear to do their assessment based on the trademarked ‘integrity meter’ devised by Haris Ibrahim.
‘Anak Malaysia’ birth cert issue
What is Hannah Yeoh best known for in her political career?
Her harassment of the bureaucracy in order for her daughter’s birth certificate to record the detail ‘Anak Malaysia’.
In Selangor alone, there are up to 40,000 Indian children who do not have birth certificates! Without BCs, these kids cannot go to school. Without education, the vicious circle trapping Indians in a cycle of urban poverty cannot be broken.
This is not a statistic released by Hindraf. Instead it was an admission in January 2008 made by the Selangor Menteri Besar Mohd Khir Toyo.
Stateless Indians is an issue long taken up by Hindraf and Uthaya. Pakatan politicians, on the contrary, are more concerned about their Bangsar Malaysia peacock preening than they are for those of dark skin living from hand to mouth.
Such a stark contrast in priorities. Between battling to obtain birth certificates for Indian squatter children, and battling to amend the birth cert of a Subang Jaya Anak Malaysia whose father they insist is “not Indian”.
Pakatan, paragons of virtue
The DAPsters thump their chests that they and their leaders have nobly risen above petty race concerns.
Below is a Malaysia Today reader comment that thinks that for a non-Indian, I’ve made some very good observations on the Indian condition. This being so, I should actually be in the Pakatan good books as one non-Indian highlighting Indian concerns.
But you know the Pakatan wonderful double standards lah. Instead I’m told to “spot a dot on [my] forehead and put on that sari showing that rounded waistline before the Indians will even listen to you” (see ‘Noble House’s comment below). And this guy calls me “racist”.
According to Pakatan practise, only Indians should talk about Indian issues despite the DAP and PKR prettily preaching multi-culturalism.
Where’s the Pakatan press freedom?
I shall address one last bullet point by Inderjit, i.e. his allegation that I am “Rejected by the MSM n Online News Portals”.
Even though Malaysia Today does aggregate some my writings once in a blue moon, I know that their administrators are reluctant to do so. Not because they “reject” my articles as Inderjit claims but because they wish to spare me having to put up with the type of comments like his.
The “white man” allusion in the title is to the video below.
YouTube shows how the whites, in their mission to ‘civilize’ heathens who do not subscribe to their religious ideology of ‘righteousness exalts a nation‘, massacred a whole tribe of native Americans (the ‘Red Indians’).