Posted in Api dalam sekam

Kalau Dr M boleh pecat Anwar dari kabinet, kenapa tidak boleh Najib pecat MCA?

“Mana-mana tempat yang majoriti pengundinya Melayu, Umno jangan faraidkan kepada rakan BN,” ujar blog Tenggara is Southeast.

Blog Johor tersebut menyampaikan nasihat berikut: “Kalau tak diambil berat akan hal ini, tak mustahil pada PRU 14 nanti, banyak kawasan majoriti Melayu yang Umno faraidkan kepada MCA atau MIC akan jatuh ke tangan parti lawan”.

Parti Melayu tunjang BN perlu bertegas kerana “sudah sampai masanya rakan Umno dalam BN berusaha untuk mendapat kerusi samada DUN ataupun Parlimen atas sokongan majoriti kaum mereka sendiri,” sambung blogger Tenggara is Southeast itu yang mencerminkan cetusan hati ahli-ahli Umno akar-umbi.

5starlogo= CORONG SUARA DAP

.
Blogger otai GAP (Gerakan Anti PKR) menyokong seratus-peratus cadangan blogger Tenggara is Southeast.

Ramai yang kini mula memberontak kerana tidak tahan sikap berpeluk tubuh pucuk pimpinan Umno tatkala ditipu hidup-hidup oleh musang berbulu ayam.

Baca, ‘Laman rasmi MCA penuh dengan tweet-tweet para pemimpin DAP(screenshot bawah)

MCAlks

Prestasi pencapaian MCA nyata tahap ‘Gagal’

Orang Cina suka menguar-uarkan “meritokrasi” sebagai kayu ukur. Ia yang membawa kesan tiada ruang akan diberi kepada barang sesiapa yang tidak memiliki ‘merit’ (cakap biasa: bagi orang yang tak buat kerja).

Yet MCA itself signally fails to perform (with the exception of Chua Soi Lek) and delivers nothing to the BN.

Hakikat MCA “tak guna” ini terserlah melalui krisis MH370 di mana serangan bertubi-tubi terhadap kerajaan telah dilancarkan di media sosial Cina tanpa MCA tampil untuk mempertahankan BN, khususnya Umno yang tidak reti bahasa Cina.

Sebaliknya, warganegara Malaysia yang keturunan Cina mengambil kesempatan untuk memburuk-burukkan nama ibu pertiwi di kacamata dunia tanpa apa-apa usaha menangkis keluar daripada MCA.

MCA=DAP

MCA duduk BN tiada merit tetapi hanya berasaskan kuota

Sistem kuota DEB diungkit and dicemuh sehabis-habisnya oleh orang Cina yang membayangkan orang Melayu tidak layak dilantik sebagai ketua atau pengarah, misalnya dalam DCA (Jabatan Penerbangan Awam) atau TUDM and TLDM yang masih belum lagi menjumpai pesawat MAS yang hilang itu selepas sebulan mencari.

Kata orang Cina juga, kuota rizab tempat kosong untuk diisi kaum bumiputera adalah satu bentuk “rentier economy”. Dalam kata mudah, maksud mereka ialah orang Melayu sememangnya tidak mempunyai kemahiran tetapi masih mahu memegang jawatan tinggi semata-mata atas dasar kelebihan warna kulit (“kulitfication”).

Namun bukankah MCA bertenggek di BN berlandaskan pendekatan yang sama? Kononnya MCA mewakili masyarakat Cina meskipun parti itu telah ditolak dengan secara menyeluruh oleh para pemilih Cina. Kalau tiada alasan perkauman ini – yakni rumusan yang diwarisi daripada Perikatan – maka tiada lagi alasan untuk MCA dikekalkan dalam kabinet.

Keadaan yang dirungkai di atas sebenarnya memperlihatkan amalan dwi-standard orang Tionghua. Mereka mahu mengenakan “meritokrasi” ke atas golongan pribumi tetapi enggan memakainya ke atas diri sendiri. Mereka menghina kewujudan kuota sebagai tongkat bagi orang Melayu tetapi mahu juga menuntut kuota MCA dalam jemaah menteri.

Dr Mahathir: "There was a time when Christians believed in the Inquisition, in killing Christian non-conformists, Muslims and Jews" ('Call me a Heretic'. TIME)
Dr Mahathir: “There was a time when Christians believed in the Inquisition, in killing Christian non-conformists, Muslims and Jews” (‘Call me a Heretic’ in TIME magazine)

1998: Anwar disingkir

Dr Mahathir Mohamad telah melucutkan Anwar Ibrahim daripada jawatannya sebagai Timbalan Perdana Menteri merangkap Menteri Kewangan pada 2 Sept 1998.

Pada 14 Sept 1998, Dr M menulis di majalah TIME sebuah rencana bertajuk ‘Call Me a Heretic‘ untuk memperjelaskan keputusan mendadak yang diambilnya itu.

Kata beliau:

“How do you tell a man being devoured by a tiger that he is really helping to preserve a treasured species?

“The fact is that the economic disaster would not have happened if the speculators had not attacked the currencies and the share markets. If it could happen without their attacks, it would have happened long ago. The same systems and practically the same governments had ruled these countries for 40 long years.”

Cuba bandingkan dengan situasi semasa.

Parti pemerintah yang sama, dengan menggunapakai sistem pemerintahan yang sama, telah mentadbir negara kita selama 40 tahun (BN ditubuhkan pada 1974). Sepanjang tempoh ini, keselamatan dan kestabilan negara tidak pernah dan tidak tergugat kecuali kalau ada berlakunya serangan hendap oleh musuh dalam selimut … atau ‘bencana alam’ seperti tsunami.

BN umpama mangsa yang sedang dibaham harimau.

Adakah ia munasabah BN dituntut agar tidak mengenakan apa-apa tindakan ke atas “sang harimau yang membaham” kerana binatang itu adalah spesi lindung?

Membela MCA pun sama bahayanya ibarat memikul biawak hidup.

MCA dan DAP berdakapan
MCA dan DAP berdakapan

Jangan bagi MCA masuk kabinet

Berkongsi buah pendapatnya pada tahun 1998, Dr Mahathir seterusnya berkata:

“Hoping for market forces to create a stable currency exchange, a stable economy and stable politics is the same as doing nothing and leaving everything to fate” (sumber: ‘Politics and Markets in the Wake of the Asian Crisis‘, Google Books)

Yang releven kepada kita ialah kerat pesanan yang berbunyi, “Hoping for market forces to create … stable politics is the same as doing nothing and leaving everything to fate”.

“Kuasa pasaran”, iaitu desakan dan tuntutan oleh pembangkang Cina dan penganut Kristian, tidak mungkin akan membolehkan kestabilan politik terus wujud di negara.

MCA yang bersekongkol dengan DAP saban hari meningkatkan ketidakstabilan.

Kita perlu ingat bahawa jentera propaganda MCA The J-Star pernah diharamkan pada Oktober 1987 di bawah ISA kerana ancamannya terhadap keamanan dan ketenteraman awam.

Kalau sampai Anwar Ibrahim selaku TPM dan Menteri Kewangan pun boleh disingkir, tidak ada sebab mengapa Presiden MCA dan timbalannya – yang tidak menerima apa-apa sokongan daripada masyarakt Cina – tidak boleh disisih daripada kabinet juga.

(856 patah perkataan)

Author:

I have no Faceook or Twitter.

48 thoughts on “Kalau Dr M boleh pecat Anwar dari kabinet, kenapa tidak boleh Najib pecat MCA?

  1. Tak jadi.

    Parti yang memerintah ni terlalu risau, terlalu takut di tuduh rasis jika MCA di singkirkan.

    Meritokrasi ni adalah satu pembohongan yang amat besar. Mana ada meritokrasi ? Mana ada negara kat dunia ni yang amalkan meritokrasi 100% ? Lihat saja kat UK. Ramai ahli politik UK terutama sekali dari parti Tories yang datang dari Eton. Jangan terpedaya dengan laungan meritokrasi yang di bawa oleh pembangkang.

    Kalau nak contoh yang lebih dekat, lihat saja arena politik Asean. Filipina, Thailand, yang berkuasa, politik atau korporat, rata rata dari golongan yang sama.

    Meritokrasi hanya akan menguntungkan golongan yang ada resources.

    1. re: “Parti yang memerintah ni terlalu risau, terlalu takut di tuduh rasis jika MCA disingkirkan.”

      Dengan adanya MCA menyandang jawatan kabinet pun Umno tidak putus-putus dituduh rasis. Malah “cuaca” pun didakwa Puan Speaker sebagai “ekstremis” ibarat rasisme Perkasa, sebuah pertubuhan yang dituduh Hannah Yeoh sebagai puak pelampau anak didik Umno.

      Adanya MCA dalam kabinet tidak membawa apa-apa untung kepada BN. Sekalipun Liow Tion Lai dilantik sebagai TPM (II), orang Cina masih akan menggelarnya sebagai “anjing jinak Umno”.

      Buat dipandang rasis, tak buat pun dipandang rasis. Baik DS Najib lepas tangan sahaja.

      Sebelum ini ayahandanya TUN RAZAK pernah dilaporkan sebagai berkata:

      “Malaysia’s multi-communal Government abruptly fell apart today with the certainty that there is no longer to be Chinese representation in the Cabinet, nor in the State Government controlled by the ruling Alliance Party.

      “Tun Abdul Razak, the Deputy Prime Minister, brusquely announced this, saying the Chinese had brought it on themselves by preferring Opposition parties.” (The Times of London, 14 May 1969)

      Source: http://books.google.com.my/books?id=md9UAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA80&lpg=PA80&dq=%22Tunku+Abdul+Rahman+sobbed+as+he+went+on+nationwide+television+to+plead+with+rioters+end+fighting.&source=bl&ots=1vRWrniNIa&sig=qJyMqZhbUNqXZz_4vcxIdMfhuus&hl=en&sa=X&ei=wWI_U8etCcfliAf2toD4Bw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

      1. re “Malaysia’s multi-communal Government abruptly fell apart today with the certainty that there is no longer to be Chinese representation in the Cabinet, nor in the State Government controlled by the ruling Alliance Party.

        “Tun Abdul Razak, the Deputy Prime Minister, brusquely announced this, saying the Chinese had brought it on themselves by preferring Opposition parties.” (The Times of London, 14 may 1969)

        The return of a cycle perhaps ?

        1. Tun, from the TIME article cited above:

          “We may fail, of course, but we are going to do our damnedest to succeed, even if all the forces of the rich and the powerful are aligned against us. God willing, we will succeed.”

          1. O how I really miss him. He is such a motivator too.

            BTW, the monitor lizards were having a fight instead of ‘berdakapan’ per se, I think? They both look cute, though :D

  2. Hanya ‘rosmah’ yg mampu singkirkan mca.
    Bersih? Cekap? Amanah? itu yg tiada pada pemimpin umno sekarang-

      1. Helen,

        Actually the problem is not with MCA. The problem is with UMNO leadership who refuses to accept reality that MCA has ceased to be a meaningful partner in BN.

        UMNO refuses to accept reality that the Chinese are no longer with BN. Let us face it. They have abandoned BN for good. But in HIS infinite mercy, Allah SWT has shown that while chinese support is crucial, it is not enough to dethrone UMNO( or more importantly the Malays) from political power.,

        Many in UMNO are fond of saying that had not for Chinese support, BN would have lost in 1999? Really? Then why in 2013 despite almost total rejection of BN by chinese, BN still “holds the fort”?

        The answer lies in the fact that the key to Putrajaya is with the Malay majority. anyone who wants power must get the lion share of Malay votes. Not because Malays are “choen race” but because they happen to be 60% of the population.

        The days of fielding MCA in Malay areas are ending. Malays no longer are willing to support dying political party like MCA.

        So if UMNO wants Alor setar, Kuantan in next elecction, put Malay candidates there,
        .

        1. re: “The problem is with UMNO leadership”

          Then the Umno leadership has to be shown that this stance will cost them. I believe the Malay grassroots are stirring as demonstrated by the calls made by the cited Umno bloggers. Umno leaders ignore the ground at their own peril.

          re: “Many in UMNO are fond of saying that had not for Chinese support, BN would have lost in 1999? Really?”

          Not really. The Malay swing to PAS in 1999 was significant. The Chinese swing to BN was there but not as big as it has been made out to be. If I have the time, we should examine the detailed results.

          You’re correct. The Chinese gave their best shot at “Kuburkan Umno” in GE13, and BN is still standing even after the tsunami.

          1. Helen,

            Even at its best performance(2004), Chinese support for BN is less than 50%. The Chinese factor actually is over emphasized.

            “BN is still standing….”

            I am more worried with Malay votes. Najib still unable to understand the Malays. the community feels that Najib is taking them lightly while currying favour with Chinese who already rejected him outright.

            Many Malays who support UMNO are beginning to feel irritated with Najib continuing to please those who literally want him dead.

  3. Buat baik berpada pada, buat jahat jgn sekali. melayu ni dah terlampau baik, terlampau toleransi sebab tu org berani pijak kepala. kalu cina ni warga negara kat negara lain, tak berani plak nak buka mulut walaupun tak diberi cuti umum pada Ch New Yeaŕ, tak berani pula nak tuntut macam2 walaupun tak ada sekolah vernakular, tak berani pula nak làwan Raja.

    Kalu kat Siam, sepatah kamu hina raja, kena sumbat dlm penjara lah jadinya.

    Kalu kat negara lain haramkan main mercun dan bunga api, tak berani pula buka mulut.

    Tak berani pula pacak tok pekong haram sana sini.

    Melayu pun salah juga sebab suka sangat makan rasuah, kalu tak jalan rasuah wang ringgit, rasuah amoi, kalu tak rasuah kaki botol. Bila dah makan rasuah, semua lulus… melayu kemana, Islam kemana…

    Dulu dah kena tipu dek MCA, lepas ni ditipu oleh DAP plak!

    Kalu dah sampai tahap ni, melayu masih tidor lagi, putih mata lah jawabnya.

  4. Bangsa yg hidup dengan amalan budaya yg karut dan tak masuk akal, tiada halangan untuk mereka melakukan perbuatan yg biadap serta berlaku sombong dengan apa yg telah miliki.

  5. Umno perlu kekalkan mca supaya umno dapat tunjukkan kpd org melayu bagaimana dia dapat perintah org cina dan bagaimana mca jadi budak baik dan patuh kpd org melayu.

    Mca boleh nakal, boleh samseng, boleh tidak setuju, boleh berbaik dng dap dan menjadi racist tetapi selagi ia hanya di media cina ia tidak mengkudiskan ego umno… malah umno sokong untuk mca terus berlakon di kalangan kaumnya.

    Dalam politik tiada yg mustahil – DAP joint BN melalui Jambatan Persahabatan Singapura Malaysia.

  6. Betulke?
    “Public receptive to films portraying 1Malaysia concept”
    Define public.

    “All communities come out to view this film and from there, we know that Malaysians are receptive to films with the 1Malaysia concept,” he said.

    Berapa orang Melayu pergi tengok filem Ah Beng, Ah Huat? Soalan kedua, berapa orang Cina menonton filem KL Gangster? Blockbuster Namewee Hantu Gangster berapa orang Melayu sudah tengok?

    Soalan, “The Journey” mengisahkan budak perempuan Cina Malaysia balik jumpa bapa di Cameron Highland kerana nak kahwin jantan Caucasian. Kahwin dan migrate ke overseas itu 1Malaysia ke? Tak bolehke ada kisah budak Cina kawin Melayu atau India ke dan tak migrate ke negara orang puteh.
    Soalan: Ada berapa orang Melayu dari kampung telah menonton “The Journey”?

    Sebenarnya penonton amat selesa dengan kisah orang Cina kahwin Mat Salleh dan migrate. Itu 1Malaysia ke?

    http://www.nst.com.my/latest/public-receptive-to-films-portraying-1malaysia-concept-1.558020

    1. You are so betul. Kalau masuk aje mat salleh ok. Ramai yg perasan mat salleh ni semua betul. Melayu2 pun samada sendiri kahwin mat salleh atau anaknya kahwin mat salleh, lupa terus nilai2 ketimuran dan kemelayuan.

      Mca is dead and umno tahu. Cuma dont want to be lablled racist.

      1. re: “Mca is dead and Umno tahu”

        So where do the Malays go from there, then?

  7. Elok juga MCA biawak tu diberi portfolio jaga sepasang panda bear yg diberi pinjam oleh china ie Menteri Panda

  8. At least, those 1,000 ++ Chinese had chose to do the right thing, that is to drop their citizenship altogether.  I bet that when asked by foreigners about why they chose to do so, they would say that Malaysia didn’t treat them right and that the bumiputera privileges have closed all opportunities for them to prosper.  And the Muslim’s morning prayer calls make their lives miserable.  And the Malay-government is so corrupt that they hardly can do a decent business. 

    http://hardtalkmalaysia.blogspot.com/2014/04/too-greedy-for-malaysia-too-proud-for.html

  9. Ms H. As in everything, commonsense which is coupled with a person’s intellect plays a part in his/her actions. A person is a very complex being. The timing of when to strike or when to withdraw is another key to a person’s success. His/her vision for the future is paramount in the steps into the unknown.

    My personal experience in the above confirms. I was offered the best State Exco seat of Kuala Kubu Baru, Selangor for the 1969 General Elections. I declined due to the iinsistence of my advisers – Tan Sri Dr C.C. Too the foremost adviser to the Federal Government and my friends in the UMNO Youth. They were right. Again, in 1973, Tun Tan Siew Sin offered his own Federal Batu Ber;endam seat with the post of Deputy Minister of Finance attached. I again declined.

    These were the 2 cross-roads which I did not take which saved the day for me who believed in the experience, information and vision of my advisers.

    Within this context,

    1) if the DPM in 1997 took his sabbatical with his family in Disneyland, he would have returned in 1998 as the Honourable Prime Minister of Malaysia. All those events which actually happened would not have happened. Maybe the kitchen cabinet of advisers gave the wrong advice. They are still with BN !

    2) In 2008, if the Opposition had sorted out the 32 Federal seat BEFORE and not AFTER, it would have already won TWO General Elections by now. They forgot they would have controlled the Treasury and by this, it wold have cost no money !

    3) In 2013, if the Opposition had declared a 100 day fast and boycotted the 13th General Elections and permitted the BN to win 100% of the seats with 49% of the votes, it would be in Putrajaya roiling in power and money long ago.

    THE ROAD TO RICHES AND POWER IN JUST 3 EASY STEPS ! See how the Thai do it ! What a waste of money, hot air etc by running round the hot humid streets of KL, marching around in the Ulus, Bersih this and Bersih that ( I expect further retirements to come )

    What am I trying to say ? It is that the Singaporean Trojan Horse DAP leadership’s gumption for politics is dull, colourless and obstinate confirming that they are unqualified and uneducated for their alloted task. It is time their spiritual leader the brilliant Lee Kuan Yew with his 15, yes 15 failed Policies for Singapore SACK THE WHOLE LOT – a waste of time and money !

    1. AK since meritocracy had been mentioned up-thread, could you kindly tell us more on Ho Ching and how much Temasek had lost with her being at helm…

      Seriously AK is there no one else better in the First World Singapura that none (at least some one not related to the PM) can replace her to run Temasek to Majulah Singapura?

      1. Islam 1st. I am very happy about the awakening of Malaysians like you to the fallacy that the one-street town of Singapore is a super-duper city State and that its people are superior to us Malaysians since the beginning of time.

        This is a load of rubbish. Made in Singapore Bluffology.

        There are many amongst us Malaysians who are smarter and cleverer than them hands down. The decades of brainwashing from Singapore gave some us the inferiority complex.

        [Deleted *** Uncle AK47, we get it already your take on the “15 failed policies of S’pore” — Helen]

        The brilliant Lee Kuan Yew made his whole career out of his brilliant achievements at Cambridge which we all should not have any doubt.BUT HE FORGOT THAT AS SOON AS WE LEAVE THE PORTALS OF A UNIVERSITY, WE THROW AWAY OUR BOOKS EXCEPT FOR THE PROFESSIONALS AND START ALL OVER AGAIN. We all have an even chance.

        This is why our good Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad is a far better Statesman than the brilliant Lee Kuan Yew who kept glorifying himself. Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad did a far better job for our beloved Malaysia than the brilliant Lee Kuan Yew who screwed down the indigenous population of Singapore from 100% in 1959 to 62% in 2013 Vide Singapore Government White Paper on Population.

        It is because of the decades of lies emanating from ordinary people in Singapore to do down the Malays to make them feel inferior and this nearly resulted in the destruction of our beloved Malaysia that I am forced to tell the truth.

        In answer to your question about the capabality of a person in business or public affairs, my observation is that engineers, lawyers and accountants are not suited to be business people. They are too calculating. And more on the same subject please read the following.
        1. http://www.tremeritus.com/2014/03/17spore-ranks-5th-in-global-crony-capitalism-index
        2. http://www.tremeritus.com/2014/03/20/singapores-crony-capitalism-a-recipe-for-disaster
        3. http://www.tremeritus.com/2014/03/28/recent-academic-work-on-temasek
        4. http:www.tremeritus.com/2014/03/29/demise-of-a-nation/
        5. http://www.tremeritus.com/2014/04/06/meritocrazy-in-a-decadent-city-state.

        Islam 1st. If not for our beloved Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s 22 year Administration to created a huge MALAY MIDDLE INCOME GROUP WHICH BROUGH UP THE NON-MALAY MIDDLE INCOME GROUP, the Malays would have been SLAVES in their own homeland. The Tun did not sell our grandmothers down river !
        This is the reason why some people with ulterior motives hate him because he stood in their way for 22 years TO CREATE THE HUGE MALAY MIDDLE INCOME GROUP WHICH NOW PROVIDES THE PEACE, THE STABILITY AND HARMONY TO OUR BELOVED MALAYSIA. In comparison, you will note that the naysayers are not flogging the dead horse of brilliant Singapore WHICH HAS REALLY NOTHING TO OFFER US OR MALAYSIA.

        At the end of the day, Malaysia is now ahead of Singapore in all aspects. And as I always say there is no difference in anything between the different communities because we are different.

        AS LONG AS WE DO EVERYTHING NORMALLY WITH NORMALITY/NORMALCY, YOU, ME AND OUR BELOVED MALAYSIA WILL BE THERE – anywhere we want to be, no need to be like the Singaporeans going for the Sun like Icarus !

        1. [deleted]

          Uncle AK47,

          No more mention of “Lee Kuan Yew with his 15 failed policies for Singapore again and again”, please. — Helen

          1. Haiya Helen, why not? Malays, err Malaysians mudah lupa maa? AK reminders to all of us is crucial for us to know where we are going…

            I like to be reminded by the 15 failed policies, I still can’t cite them all auto, can you, Helen?

            By the way I don’t see you censor Pedang with his padang pasir remarks? So why the double standard?

                1. Ms H. No big deal when I cannot mention about the brilliant Lee Kuan Yew with his 15………….for Singapore. As a law-abiding citizen always, I observe your house rules.

            1. islam1st. It is so very important that our beloved Malaysia must stand as a bastion as a haven of peace, stability, prosperity for many races to provide an example to the World that we do not need to fight and kill each other even though there are sinister hands pushing and pulling against the general will.

              In this respect, the Malays and the Bumiputras of Malaysia must be the building block to sustain the life and survival of the nation bearing in mind their centuries of historical, cultural and religious heritage and legacies. Our politics must have a MALAY bias. Anything less will send our beloved Malaysia into OBLIVION a fate worst than Humpty-Dumpty.

              It is the Malays and the Bumiputras who count through the Royal Sultans, the Constitution, the religion, UMNO, our Malaysian Democracy, the attendant cultural and other conventions which make up what is our beloved Malaysia.

              Attempts to turn our beloved Malaysia into something else will not only fail but bring along disaster to the present peace, stability prosperity which we are so used to due to the efforts of the BN as led by the UMNO with the 15 component parties.

              We must also remember that nothing is perfect. And we should not be complacent.

          2. Ms H. Our political problems of today are caused by Lee Kuan Yew and his character. He always wanted to win from young. This was what my sister told me. She was with him at Raffles College in 1941. Man proposes. God disposes.

          1. power. The Singapore Government White Paper on Population. 2013. By 2030, its indigenous population will be down to 45%. You cannot have a country made up of imported foreigners. In 1982, a Fellow of Jesus College, Cambridge told me that the fall of Rome was not because of the barbarians at the gate but because of the influx of foreigners from her Colonies ! Look at United Kingdom and the EU today !

        2. For a tiny nation which we do not need, we certainly are doing a lot of business with them with the proposed third bridge and highway to Mersing and Iskandar Region, and the KL-Singapore high speed rail.

          1. Not to mention the thousands of people from Johor that traveled daily to Singapore for work and attend the schools there.

  10. At least MCA didn’t drag their offspring at the Parliament. I’m so disgusted at this Opposition!! What they get by bringing their babies at Parliament ? Remind me of syndicated beggars that use babies to milked sympathies

  11. “‘Remind me of syndicated beggars that use babies to milked sympathies”‘

    reminds me of a certain Evangelista from putra heights

  12. Islam 1st.. Here is how Temasek Holdings and maybe GIC of Singapore got their money from.

    1. Central Provident Fund gives say Singapore $ 100 Billions cash to the Singapore Government.

    2. The Singapore Government issues an IOU with a LOW coupon rate (Singaporeans are screaming at this).for the Singapore $ 100 Billions cash from CPF. Date of maturity determined by the Singapore Government.

    3. The Singapore Government puts the S $ 100 Billions into Temasek as equity or loan, or other entities like the GIC. Thereafter, the whole operation is opaque !!!

    Temasek and GIC lost a minimum of US $ 108 Billions in October 2008. Vide. Channelnewsasia. Lee Kuan Yew November 2008.

    Weaknesses in this arrangement.

    1. All the smart alecs of the World sitting on the doorstep daily.

    2. Top management succumb to flattery when named as ‘Most Influential Person in the World.’ by Time Magazine which is controlled by the very chaps who sit on the doorstep.

    3. Abdication of sovereignty of a Nation in the control of the money to these riff-raffs. When the money was lost, these folks could not be found.

    4. Temasek and GIC monies ended up investing in huge amounts in the top banks in which the CEO were paid fortunes annually. This fact should have kept them away. But they plunged headlong into the mess.

    5. 2000-2007 were the years in which a huge global bubble was building up. Temasek and GIC senior staff were compromised by the very good salaries – so they could not say no to any proposal.

    6. Areas of investments not clearly defined – political or profits !

    7. Miscellaneous – the CPF contributors will never see their money again – hence all the juggling and wrestling with the HDB properties.

    1. Thanks AK, I’m surprised at how ugly Ho Ching, as a rich women, is. She looks like a maid without the make up, especially standing next to Rosmah.

      So AK would you say with all the bonuses etc, Ho Ching had more money than she wants us to believe, with he bare faced facade?

  13. Helen….

    apa kata anda buat tinjauan pendapat di kalangan pembaca semua tentang perlu atau tidak UMNO mengusulkan supaya ‘perkongsian’ atau ‘perikatan’ dalam BN di kaji semula?

    1. The Umno president cum BN chairman cum Prime Minister is inclusive and a peacemaker/keeper and willing to give the erstwhile coalition partners the benefit of the doubt.

  14. It is ironic that you bring up Anwar’s sacking in 1998 to link it with the proposal by someone else to break ties with the MCA AND the MIC.

    In 1999, it was the MCA, and the MIC, that helped the Barisan Nasional hold on to power in the aftermath of Anwar’s sacking and trial. Meanwhile Kelantan and Terengganu fell to PAS.

    In 1987, the MCA held the fort while UMNO was having its own legal crisis.

    Back to the proposal by that blogger to take away the seats given to MCA AND MIC, the result would see no seats at all to be contested by the MIC. How many constituencies are there with an Indian majority? That would be a good way to lose whatever Indian support that remains.

    But to these bloggers, the Indians are just ‘pari*hs’ or ‘kel*ngs’ who must obey when they are ordered to eat in shower rooms.

    And you wonder why when they start verbally bashing the Indians.

    1. ‘But to these bloggers, the Indians are just ‘pari*hs’ or ‘kel*ngs’ who must obey when they are ordered to eat in shower rooms.’

      Its been a while since we come to see those two labels. A case of kata dulang paku serpih eh?

      What would we be without you lots?!

Comments are closed.