Posted in Evangelista Bintang Tiga

Hudud: Muslims on one side, non-Muslims on the other

The Hudud Bill being drafted by PAS for Parliament is splitting the country into two.

The latest news: ‘MCA to form human shield to stop PAS(The Sun Daily, 28 Apr 2014)

Earlier: ‘Gerakan Youth vows legal roadblock to PAS’s hudud bid(The Malay Mail, 24 Apr 2014)

BELOW: “First Gerakan, now you too MCA?”

Twitter - eddydaud- #hudud 1st Gerakan now U too

Now all the Chinese parties oppose hudud

So now we have it, the hudud opposition tripartite of DAP + Gerakan + MCA“, tweets blogger Eddy Daud (see below).

Don’t forget the Chinese-dominated political parties in Sabah and Sarawak, Eddy.

And there you have it, opposition to hudud from the Chinese parties collectively. Now showing in the cinema near you … after the DAP shit has hit the fan.

Twitter - eddydaud- So now we have it the #hudud

PAS is consistent, DAP the shit-stirrers

Ever since PAS was established in 1951, the Islamist party has been unwavering in its insistence on hudud.

Hence any hudud initiative – continually coming from PAS – is nothing new nor unexpected. It’s the same as what they’ve always been clamouring for over the past six decades.

What’s new is this — ‘Umno proposes national level hudud technical committee‘ (NST via Bernama, 27 Apr 2014).

Assuredly Umno and PAS are closing ranks demi Bangsa, Agama dan Negara.

BELOW: Nope, they’re not PAS politicians and not Umno politicians either. Drumroll … meet the DAP evangelista YBs

EvangelistaYBs

How did Umno reach this present pass?

Consider Umno’s founder Dato’ Onn Jaafar. He was the one who sounded the famous warning “Hubaya! Hubaya! Bahaya akan turun dari gunung”.

For those delusional Dapsters who are buta sejarah, please read up on Gunung Semanggol and Madrasah Ehya Assharif.

The Umno president who is Bapa Kemerdekaan is famously known for enjoying a little flutter on the horses (i.e. betting at the races) and his drinks as well. Nobody’s talking about the Tunku’s afternoon Darjeeling tea, okay. Umno, for the past 60 years and more, has never pushed for hudud.

Even the Umno prez who was the fourth Prime Minister is still against the implementation of hudud. Isn’t it ironic that today Guan Eng and his hatchet men have to bank on their bete noir Dr Mahathir’s support to oppose hudud? See, the Iguana Eng’s press statement on 26 Apr 2014

Guinness-Stout-ad-1968

Evangelista Bintang Lima

.
Umno is the Parti Paling Tidak Apa.

Under Umno’s watch and in the good ol’ days of black and white P. Ramlee movies, Malay girls with hourglass figures were featured in cabaret scenes.

All the wives of the Prime Ministers (concurrently the Umno presidents) did not wear tudung when their husbands were in office.

The Umno DNA is selambe aje.

DAP, on the other hand, inherited the most slick and conniving genes. Its parent party is the PAP, whose Lee Kuan Yew famously wore the songkok to fish Malay votes during his election campaign. Has anyone ever seen Lee in a songkok since then?

khalifahKGE

The bermuka-muka politics of the DAP

How did PAS eventually get to this step that the party is currently taking? Well, PAS is responding to overtures from Umno.

Why is Umno making overtures to PAS with greater urgency? Well, PAS’s 21 Muslim MPs are a more attractive proposition than MCA and Gerakan’s combined 8 Chinese MPs who, in any case, are occupying Malay-majority constituencies.

Why are PAS and Umno feeling so besieged? Well, how about the DAP 3.0’s gutter politics of tak habis-habis fitnah, hina, hasut, maki-hamun, putar-belit, tipu siang malam, asak tak henti-henti … how can any sane and decent people possibly cope with such perpetual hysteria?

PPTA-Umno simply has no answer to the Evangelista Bintang Lima. Do recall that the British needed to station 380,000 armed troops in Malaya in the early 1950s just to withstand the Bintang Tiga onslaught.

The Bintang Lima cyber terrorists are far more sophisticated, efficient and deadly than the Bintang Tiga jungle commies.

Just look at their awesome green camouflage

Poster photoshop yang popular di blogosfera Melayu

The lamentions below by MCA traces the hudud developments whereas the italicized comments within square brackets are inserted by this blogger.

List of MCA press statements this week:

  • ‘Conflicting answers on PAS hudud – Who is lying?’ [DAP obviously] — MCA statement 22 Apr 2014
    .
  • DAP as the largest Opposition party must resist PAS’ hudud move [Poetic justice: They’re relying on Umno to say ‘No’] — MCA statement on 22 Apr 2014
    .
  • Will the 3 DAP Aduns dare to stick to their proposal to amend the Selangor Non-Islamic Religions (Control of Propagation Among Muslims) Enactment 1988? [Heh-heh-heh, what do you think?]  — MCA statement 23 Apr 2014
    .
  • DAP must stop misleading non-Muslims on hudud’s impact [Kalau tak bohong namanya bukan Dapster-evangelista] — MCA statement 24 Apr 2014
    .
  • Even non-Muslims within PAS are ignored, what more others outside the party? [The DAP evangelista YBs who are pseudo Muslims can try their luck] — MCA statement 25 Apr 2014
    .
  • In his thirst for power, Kit Siang hid the truth about PAS [Tolong salahkan kaum Cina yang telan bulat-bulat segala apa yang disogokkan mereka oleh DAP ; Kan niat PAS sudah sekian lama tersurat?] –– MCA statement 25 Apr 2014
    .
  • What will DAP do if PAS ignores Loke’s threats? [The Greedy DAP Gold diggers will still be enjoying the 30 pieces of silver that they’ve already collected] — MCA statement 26 Apr 2014
    .
  • DAP and the Chinese community must remove Kit Siang & son for agreeing with Hudud [Let’s remove MCA first for allowing the wu yue wu’ tsunami to sweep away all Chinese resistence to the DAP] – MCA statement 27 Apr 2014
    .
  • DAP must apologise over revelations that they have agreed to Hudud Law [MCA must also apologize for its J-Star and other party machinery aiding and abetting the DAP evangelistas] – MCA statement 27 Apr 2014
    .
  • Stop slandering others while trying to divert attention, Kit Siang [The MCA’s J-Star promoted Kit Siang when he diverted attention from the Chinese tsunami by calling it “Malaysian tsunami” and “urban tsunami”] — MCA statement 29 Apr 2014
    .
  • Kit Siang must stop diverting attention on hudud but address the issue [The rise and rise of DAP 3.0 has been enabled through the collusion of the MCA media and machinery whose propaganda and brainwashing successfully diverted this very hudud issue to safeguard the DAP from critical scrutiny] — MCA statement 29 Apr 2014

HannahTudung001

Berani buat, berani tanggung

The evangelista elements in the DAP have been too clever by half in playing political Islam. Their initial success bestowed upon them an overweaning hubris.

What you see happening is the operation of Newton’s Third Law of Motion: ‘For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction’. For the DAP action of deceitful, hate politics that overstepped all boundaries, we see the Umno reaction of fostering Malay-Muslim unity.

The DAP’s self-serving “Islamic” pretense and rank hypocrisy is blowing up in the face of the Chinese community. You lot are getting exactly what you voted for in GE13.

.
MCA trying to outdo the DAP

Please bear in mind that the majority of my blog readers are pro-establishment Malays. Therefore the results of the hudud poll (see above) would reflect the Umno-leaning sentiments.

Three-quarters of the poll respondents agree to Umno backing the hudud move. This figure of 75 percent is going to shoot up even further with the behaviour of the MCA and Gerakan that we’re witnessing.

The DAP’s evangelistas and their thuggish adjuncts everywhere (including in The J-Star) have decisively polarized Malaysia, and hudud is splitting combatants into Muslim vs Non-Muslim opposing camps.

MCA and Gerakan through their anti-hudud manoeuvres are sealing the deal.

(1,216 words)

Author:

I have no Faceook or Twitter.

73 thoughts on “Hudud: Muslims on one side, non-Muslims on the other

  1. Zaman khalifah ada hudud tapi ramai khalifah terbunuh. Bukti hudud gagal cegah jenayah. Jadi apa guna hudud. Lebih baik cari cara selain hudud. Kita kena belajar dari sejarah.

    1. If at first you don’t succeed, try and try again.

      Kita pun ada zaman khalifah – Saidina Umar ‘Lim’ Abdul Aziz.

      Kan orang Cina lebih pandai dan lebih cekap? Biar kita bikin testing hudud DAP-evangelista.

      1. Khalifah mati terbunuh adalah lebih terhurmat dari mati selepas menipu diri sendiri.dan orang lain.

    2. Kalau hang tak buat salah nape takut sgt dgn hudud? Bagi le peluang Kelantan laksanakan hudud dulu baru nilai. Ini bukan, asyik bantah je mcm DAP.

        1. Well Pedang- I admire your stand here. I’m just pulling your leg (berjenaka) although this is a no laughing matter. Good night or good morning, wherever you are.

          Ps: sorry I couldn’t type in bahasa, the annoying English words correction is hampering me.

          1. You can not force your religious law (your belief) to others coz your belief does not mean other’s belief even same religion.

            Your can force your religious law to yourself only.

            Suni & Syiah apart coz belief forcement.

            Muslim & non-muslim farther apart coz belief forcement try. Hopefully not getting worst.

            I reject hudud coz more harm than good. Unislamic.

        2. “PAS should remember that Umno also won more Malay votes in 2013 while it did not support the implementation of hudud,” LGE said. In fact UMNO stance on kalimah Allah issues had bring the Malays closers to support the party.

          Implementing hudud is PAS only way to recover their tainted Islamic image among the Malaysian Muslim.

          The opposition Leaders real fear was not on the hudud law but rather the Islamic matter will significantly unite the Malays as a whole. This will make the Malays less dependence on the Chinese and Indian polls for the PRU14.

          1. ‘The opposition Leaders real fear was not on the hudud law but rather the Islamic matter will significantly unite the Malays as a whole.’

            Apa Lagi Cina Mahu?

            1. re: “Apa Lagi Cina Mahu?”

              Tony Pua’s letter sums up. Do you have any comment on what he says?

              1. I say T. Pua is stupid to think that OBAMACAREs!

                Especially when he whines (me, me, me ala Hannah Yeoh) when he goes to say ‘Even I am under the threat of being disqualified as a member of parliament and risk being jailed for up to two years if I were to be found guilty of “illegal assembly” for taking part in a peaceful candlelight vigil.’

                I say he is stupid because the guys reading that at Obama’s office is laughing hard at his naivety, and us, for votes given to such a person. What a waste of resources.

                The opening with my beautiful Malaysia, already worries me…, its like I tell you that I got nothing against you, but I have one thousand and one bad things to say about you, at one go.

                Lidah biawak, expected la for a Dapster.

                I say he is stupid because should he knows the fact that Obama was not even an American born to begin with, which makes him unfit to becomes the President in the first place, he would not be saying ‘I was personally moved and inspired by your victory acceptance speech in Chicago “If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible; who still wonders if the dream of our founders is alive in our time; who still questions the power of our democracy, tonight is your answer… at this defining moment, change has come to America.”

                I say we should not be taking his surat seriously. I don’t. I pun sebenarnya baru baca to give my dua sen since you tanya. Otherwise I say, why bother? What else is new, what would you expect a Dapster would say to begin with?

                1. Tony Pua’s open letter would have a lot of traction with his intended audience, i.e. all those who voted DAP or voted Pakatan due to their support for the DAP.

                  And for DAP to be able to command 90 percent Chinese support and to have decimated MCA, Gerakan and SUPP surely counts for something.

                  Among his Apa Lagi Cina Mahu grouses:

                  (1) Chinese here in this country are “discriminated politically, socially and economically”; Chinese merely demanding “human rights, equality, freedom and fundamental democratic principles”

                  (2) Chinese marginalized b’cos of race & religion, Chinese segregated b’cos of race & religion; Paraphrase: Why Chinese cannot become prime minister, ah?

                  (3) Complain that Malaysia is not a moderate country and Chinese only want more civil liberties, protection of these civil liberties and less government curbs on the said civil liberties

                  (4) Worried about religious extremism [Tony obviously pointing his finger at Muslim extremists and not at the Christian extremists]

                  (5) Want to freedom to use ‘Allah’

                  (6) Tony Pua and his Christians are unhappy about

                  (a) Bibles seizure
                  (b) “The church is currently prosecuted in the courts” — question mark / which case??
                  (c) “religious leaders are being outrageously investigated for sedition”
                  [Tony has Christian leaders in mind; the leaders of other religions are not being investigated for sedition]

                  (7) Tony Pua and his Christians are unhappy about Malay corruption

                  (8) Abuses of power by Malays in government

                  (9) Gerrymandering by the Malay EC

                  (10) “Corrupt electoral practices” by the Malay authorities

                  (11) “Media manipulation” by the Malay government

                  (12) Upset that the Malay government is pretending to the world that Malaysia enjoys “peace and harmony” when this is not true

                  Tony Pua in his letter is asking for the “unalienable rights” owing to a citizen, among them the right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”.

                  To sum up, Tony’s open letter speaks for the DAP Chinese and Christians who want to exercise their unalienable right to pursue happiness.

                  So islam1st, what have you got to say in response to Tony’s core demands?

                  1. I only do this because you have asked me too. I don’t bother to dissect it at length should it be T.Pua or yang sewaktu dengannya.

                    But you did pointed out the obvious Apa Lagi Cina Mahu genuine grouses. Some, probably yours too. Just like any other Cina, 90% or otherwise. So here goes.

                    (1) Chinese here in this country are “discriminated politically, socially and economically”; Chinese merely demanding “human rights, equality, freedom and fundamental democratic principles”

                    How? They have got the UBAH that they wanted. They menang besar in Penang. Cina DAP kerusi are moving upwards all this while. So, again, how is the Cinas are being discriminated politically? Because the last time I checked it was them, the Cinas DAP that tries hard to deny the rights of non Cina looking Malaysians (saudaras the late Karpal, I might add, can’t stand the late tiger keeping mum on that very incidence) the right to vote, the very instance they think they had the chance too!

                    Just don’t get me started on the Cinas being discriminated socially and economically, but do answer this, PJ Utara is a Cina ghetto is it?

                    BTW does T.Pua, for all the time which he had been salivating at Anwar’s gaji from Uncle Sam, thus the Dear Obama surat, reads the Forbes?

                    http://www.forbes.com/malaysia-billionaires/list/

                    All I see is the Ketuanan Cinas throughout. Will the real Cina please stand up?

                  2. (2) Chinese marginalized b’cos of race & religion, Chinese segregated b’cos of race & religion; Paraphrase: Why Chinese cannot become prime minister, ah?

                    BOLLOCKS! Who say one? Stupid T.Pua! Constitution got say or not?

                    Segregated-I thought the Cinas are all for Sekolah Jenis Cinas, Kelab Renang Cinas etc. Clubs with so many Malays is a NO! NO! Football is a NO! NO! for the obvious reasons. So stupid T.Pua is talking about what segregation again?

                    (3) Complain that Malaysia is not a moderate country and Chinese only want more civil liberties, protection of these civil liberties and less government curbs on the said civil liberties

                    Bollocks. This is a moderate country. The Malays are world famous for it. Of course should the DAP Cinas managed to get their dirty hands on Putrajaya, then all is as good as lost to mere slogans and sloganeering.

                    Civility will come, its coming to Kelantan. Hopefully then Selangor will follow, and then Perlis, Terengganu, so on and so forth. T.Pua should bersabar and do no crime. He can start by telling the truth.

                    (4) Worried about religious extremism [Tony obviously pointing his finger at Muslim extremists and not at the Christian extremists]

                    Nonsense! Although Muslims are being better informed about their religions now with a lot more discussion among and outside the communities, the Malays Ahli Sunnah Wal Jamaah will always be the moderates that they are. Just like what the Prophet SAW would want us to.

                    (5) Want to freedom to use ‘Allah’

                    Nobody is stopping him, or any Cinas to say their Syahadah. But it will come with some responsibilities. For a start, stupid T.Pua can start his reading on Unitarian Church. Read Gospel of Barnabas too along the way.

                    (6) Tony Pua and his Christians are unhappy about

                    (a) Bibles seizure-

                    He must be a criminal. Malaysia, like United States of America, has it own sets of laws to govern its citizens. Is he a Malaysian or an American?

                    (b) “The church is currently prosecuted in the courts” — question mark / which case??

                    Really? Maximus Ongkili does not think so!

                    ‘Water, Energy and Green Technology Minister Datuk Seri Panglima Dr Maximus J Ongkili (pic) became the first Christian Minister in the Federal Cabinet to openly distance himself from the church action of seeking a court solution on the use of the word “Allah” in Christian worship.

                    “The church taking the case to court is not the solution. Once the court makes a ruling, it sets a precedent and becomes law. Whatever the verdict, it makes some happy and others angry,” he told Daily Express, while stressing that it was only his personal view.’

                    http://www.dailyexpress.com.my/news.cfm?NewsID=88269

                    (c) “religious leaders are being outrageously investigated for sedition”
                    [Tony has Christian leaders in mind; the leaders of other religions are not being investigated for sedition]

                    Okay so, Christian religious leaders are above the Malaysians law?

                    PJ Utara folks are stupid don’t they?

                    1. To be fair islam1st, the [Penang] Chinese Swimming Club is just in name lah, and the name adopted long before the Firster Nazis began imposing their Political Correctness at the barrel of a gun.

                      I doubt that the swimming club has any race policy on membership.

                    2. I have no problem to look at it that way, Helen. But what’s in a name?

                      Let’s have UMNO for a start. It is known as United Malay National Organisation for a reason. To protects the interest of all pribumis. It still does. Just take a look at it’s diverse memberships. I say even more muhibbah than what DAP (and PKR for that matter) can put together!

                      But still the DAP and all Cinas regards UMNO with contempt, and the Malays are suppose to be bersangka baik with a kelab renang Cina? In the land of Barack Obama can such a club be left running without a big hoohaa?

                      Jesus AS is yet to come, but Obama is around, so perhaps, Tony Pua can draft another Dear Obama surat and ask his opinion on it?

                      What would Obama do with a kelab renang Cina? And Helen, why are we having China Press on this part of the world again?

                      So you see why I have a problem with the segregation BS paraded by the Cinas time and time again?

                      Why the Cinas are so gullible Helen?

                    3. re: “And Helen, why are we having China Press in this part of the world again?”

                      Hahahaha. You’ve framed the Question of the Year. I should do a logo on this, wink.

                      re: “So you see why I have a problem with the segregation BS paraded by the Cinas time and time again?”

                      Yes, I can see. And I thoroughly agree that Papa and Mama Dapster and their Love-Love-Love is utter bullshit.

                    4. ‘Yes, I can see. And I thoroughly agree that Papa and Mama Dapster and their Love-Love-Love is utter bullshit’

                      Perhaps the Malaysian Cinas should stop living in their Fairy Tales for change, and starts singing to the local tunes for once, to curb the segregation I say, barru lah ada happy ending!

                      [YouTube]

                    5. “I doubt that the swimming club has any race policy on membership.”

                      There are many Malay athletes who are members in the club as they train for SUKMA. The Chinese is in name only.

                      The new members for the club are Malay and Caucasians. The Chinese kids are too lazy and indisiplined to train to become athletes. The Tiger mums dont want their kids to kena the sun. I know of one Tiger mum who dresses her son from head to foot so that he tak kena sun and chlorine.

                      The Malay and Caucasian are not so troublesome. The actual come to the club to SWIM. And there are NO Malay Tiger mums.

                      I can ATTEST to this.

                  3. (7) Tony Pua and his Christians are unhappy about Malay corruption

                    (8) Abuses of power by Malays in government

                    (9) Gerrymandering by the Malay EC

                    (10) “Corrupt electoral practices” by the Malay authorities

                    (11) “Media manipulation” by the Malay government

                    (12) Upset that the Malay government is pretending to the world that Malaysia enjoys “peace and harmony” when this is not true

                    T.Pua is one anti Malay Cina Malaysia. I suspects his constituents are cuts from the same cloth. It is an open secret that the Teng Langs think of themselves highly over the Stupid Sakais.

                    So if a Malay, ever to outsmart them, they cannot tahan one. They will called you all sorts of name, like Melayu Babi, Stupid, No Brain, Lazy, Dumno etc., (you know lah)

                    ‘It’s OK la ho’, ‘cari makan maa’ excuses being thrown should they Cinas are the one that gets caught red handed! They will sembah the Malay Mata, faster and more than the times, Anwar and Mat Sabu did on Teoh Beng Hock and Karpal Singh puts together.

                    Thus the zillions hate for Tun M and Syed Al Bukhary to name a few. And of course UMNO is a code word for Melayu.

                    When they have the chance they will tell you ‘Hong Leong is a Cina bank you know, bla bla bla’, so that you toe the line. And bow your stupid Malay arse to Ketuanan Cina.

                    Knowing T.Pua via his antics over the years, the sentiment is not at all surprising!

                    ‘Pengerusi DAP Selangor, Tony Pua perlu didakwa di bawah Akta Hasutan kerana sengaja melakukan provokasi menghina Islam apabila mempertikaikan keputusan Majlis Fatwa Kebangsaan berhubung larangan umat Islam menyambut Hari Kekasih.

                    Presiden Pertubuhan Muafakat Sejahtera Masyarakat Malaysia (Muafakat), Ismail Mina Ahmad berkata, umat Islam tidak perlu menagih permohonan maaf daripada Ahli Parlimen Petaling Jaya itu disebabkan keceluparan ditunjukkan, tetapi perlu mengheretnya ke mahkamah.

                    “Kita perlu dakwa dia di mahkamah dengan segera sebagai langkah pencegahan kerana sebenarnya dia sedang menguji kesabaran orang Islam,” katanya kepada Utusan Malaysia di sini hari ini.’

                    http://www.utusan.com.my/utusan/Politik/20140221/po_07/Tony-Pua-sengaja-cetus-provokasi-hina-Islam-perlu-didakwa

                    ‘Tony Pua yang juga Ahli Parlimen Petaling Jaya Utara membuat kenyataan biadap itu bagi mengulas kenyataan negarawan tersebut dalam sebuah akhbar yang menyifatkan memberi undi kepada Pakatan Pembangkang sama seperti mengundi George Soros, penyagak mata wang dunia.’

                    http://cetusankenyalang.blogspot.com/2012/10/tony-pua-biadap-hina-pemimpin-melayu.html

                    ’31hb JB, setiausaha bahagian penerangan DAP Tony Pua Kiam Wee berkata, jika Pakatan Rakyat dapat memerintah kerajaan pusat sahaja, akan kemukakan satu projek yang dinamakan “Projek Khas Mengurangkan Kakitangan Awam” untuk mengurangkan bilangan kakitangan awam berperingkat-peringkat setiap tahun.’

                    http://mymassa.blogspot.com/2011/11/terjemahan-akhbar-cina-dap-akan-buang.html

                    Why are the Cinas (I already know why some Melayus are) so gullible Helen?

                    1. re: “Pengerusi DAP Selangor, Tony Pua perlu didakwa di bawah Akta Hasutan kerana sengaja melakukan provokasi menghina Islam apabila mempertikaikan keputusan Majlis Fatwa Kebangsaan berhubung larangan umat Islam menyambut Hari Kekasih.”

                      Tony Pua wants the Malays to have the freedom of celebrating Valentine’s Day because the DAP Christian politicians are so full of love that they want to share and spread it around.

    1. Status wanita Dapster-evangelista lain sikit. Diorang lah yang “wear the pants in the family”.

      null

  2. Don’t forget BN Bumiputera parties in Sabah like PBS & UPKO have come out to oppose Hudud. I also expect Sarawak BN Bumiputera parties like PBB, PRS & SPDP to come out to oppose it to preserve the state political dynamics.

    I’m interested to see UMNO Sabah’s position on Hudud. Haha.

    ~ Anak Pasir Gudang

    1. I should think so too.

      It’s a trump card for Umno to keep up their sleeve. They can play this ace anytime later, if desperately needed.

      What’s worrying is how the MCA and Gerakan are playing the DAP’s old tune. This will make the Malay majority believe that 100 percent of Chinese voters are now anti-establishment.

      The concerted reaction by all the Chinese parties have pitted non-Muslims against Muslims. This trend has never been so pronounced before. MCA and Gerakan are reading the Malay ground very badly.

      1. Helen,

        “…this will make the malay majority…”.

        Correction. Malays ALREADY believe Chinese as anti establishment (meaning against Malay led government and whatever Malay aspirations) even without Hudud saga..

        Why UMNO seen as not interested to MCA or Gerakan opposing Hudud law? Because these 2 Chinese based parties are rejected by chinese community. so why give hoot to their concerns?

        I am not against Hudud. Just that i do not trust PAS. But i understand why UMNO is seen as not opposing Hudud proposed by Kelantan. UMNO’s stance caught PAS by surprise. Now PAS cant blame its failure to implement Hudud on UMNO.

        As for Chinese rejection, UMNO has reached the point where it does not care anymore of chinese rejection. After all, even with almost entirely Chinese rejection, UMNO still “holds the fort”. Its presence would have been bigger had not its humility in allowing lifeline to MCA and Gerakan.

    2. Mungkin sekarang orang bukan Islam tidak nampak samada hukum sivil lebih barbaric atau hukum Hudud. Kita tunggu apabila ada orang bukan islam yg sabit dengan kesalahan 38B yg membawa hukum gantung sampak mati.

      Menariknya kita nak lihat samada pesalah bukan islam itu akan sanggup mati di tali gantung mempertahankan hukum sivil atau terpaksa redha dengan hukum sebatan bagi kesalahan mereka yg pertama.

  3. Yeah. I already write it out times and times again how their behaviour will eventually blow out to their face. We will see how far this will go and how far the Chinese can stand being alienated.

    :dsarah

  4. Dear Aunty Helen,

    Thanks for posting the above advertisement – it’s really unbelievable that Guinness Stout was advertised by the Muslims and to the Muslims.

    Now, more and more Muslim activists and Muslim NGOs support UMNO. My father says most of UMNO’s ‘ceramahs’ today are like what PAS’s ‘ceramahs’ used to be; and PAS’s ‘ceramahs’ today are like what UMNO’s ‘ceramahs’ used to be; except for PAS’s ‘tabung derma’. Some of PAS’s leaders like Mujahid, Khalid Samad, Mat Sabu and some others are too busy supporting the DAPster that they sounds like DAPsters.

    UMNO becomes more Islamic and so UMNO supports PAS’s idea of implementing hudud in Kelantan.

    Do you think that MCA and Gerakan will join DAP?

    1. The Guinness Stout ad is dated 1968 according to the source of the pix on the Net.

      High society gossip magazines even today have photos of social functions where the Malay elite hold champagne glass in their hand. You can catch these photos inadvertently if the editors have been “careless” and not cropped out the ‘misadventure’ which will raise eyebrows among the Muslim pious.

      re: “Do you think that MCA and Gerakan will join DAP?”

      They already have. How else could Pakatan have gotten 90 percent of the Chinese vote otherwise?

      1. Dear Aunty Helen,

        re: “They already have. How else could Pakatan have gotten 90 percent of the Chinese vote otherwise?”

        So, they are something like Trojan Horse or gunting dalam lipatan? And how about KJ ? :D

          1. KJ needs to come out clean on his political inclination together with his followers. He is a duri dalam daging, musuh dalam selimut, api dalam sekam etc etc.

            1. re: “He is a duri dalam daging, musuh dalam selimut, api dalam sekam etc etc.”

              Dah lah tu, siap berkepit-kepit dengan musang berbulu ayam, gunting dalam lipatan etc etc lagi

  5. MCA the clown and the laughing stock of Malaysia. Chine already abandon them and to be a HERO they wanted to portray themselves better than DAP on Hudud.

    MCA bila mau sedar, you real enemy is yourself and DAP is you biggest Foe. Star pun tak boleh control sudah jadi lidah pembangkang and putar alam, MCA lu kasi malau sama Cina saja. Only muslim will be affected by Hudud while Cina/India no effect. So?

  6. RE: “What you see happening is the operation of Newton’s Third Law of Motion: ‘For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction’. For the DAP action of deceitful, hate politics that overstepped all boundaries, we see the Umno reaction of fostering Malay-Muslim unity.”

    Sir Isaac Newton would never agree with the Malaysian Catholic clergy’s determination to impute ALLAH as the “God of the Trinity” in the Paulinian bible. Newton was Unitarian in his creedal convictions.

    [YouTube]

    A documentary revealing a hidden and truly enlightened side to one of the greatest minds that western civilisation has known. His deep study of science led him to a firm conclusion that there is a Creator and based on his study of early Christian history, he was convinced that the concept of The Trinity was a falsification of the pure message of monotheism that Jesus preached.

    Newton vehemently rejected the corruption of the Christian establishment and the innovation which made Jesus divine. He believed the revealed God is the One God. During his life he was forced to keep this belief secret for fear of being labelled a heretic and after his death this information was carefully suppressed.

    Of the deceitful hate politics of the Pakatan political machinery, conniving for ascendance through stirring religious controversy, here are some of the maxims from the Gospel of Thomas:

    Jesus said, “Congratulations to the poor, for to you belongs Heaven’s kingdom.”

    Jesus said, “Whoever has come to know the world has discovered a carcass, and whoever has discovered a carcass, of that person the world is not worthy.”

  7. Kalau corruption satu hari diklasifikasikan dibawah ‘mencuri’, depa takut satni semua tangan oghang depa pun kudung pasai mereka yg turut bersubahat tak kira Islam atau Kapiaq akan dikenakan hukuman sama?

    Berzina, mak ayam dan bapa ayam kapiaq yg jadi main suppliers pon kena juga? Tambah lagi terjadi kat brothels, rumah urut.. habis le..business lumayan kena katop.. Muahahaha

    1. I was chatting with one Muslim scholar and surprised he was against the implementation of Hudud law in Kelantan.. not yet, he elaborated with one example..

      A very poor man was caught stealing food. Proven without reasonable doubts he is genuinely truly poor due to whatever reasons, stole the food to feed his hungry family.

      It is the responsibility of the State and its leaders to ensure their poor citizens’ welfare.. Kelantan over the years, have they done enough to help the very poor there? They must have everything in order first before they implement Hudud, Are they ready?

      1. Thanks for bringing up this point Rina.

        The economic data consistently says that Sabah, Terengganu and Kelantan are among the poorest states. There is hardcore poverty in the interior. I fear the havoc that would ensue when poor people are further pressured.

        What the hudud debate shows up is also the vindictiveness of those Chinese who relish the thought that “many Umnoputras” would have their hands [and testicles, they hope] chopped off, and naively believing that hudud would have no effect whatsoever on non-Muslims.

        1. Re naively believing that hudud would have no effect whatsoever on non-Muslims.

          Not naively. They know who is going to be affected. I would add that not only the downtrodden Malays are going to be affected, the Cina Bukit will also be adversely affected along with the Hindus.

          They know who’s going to be facing the “firing” squad (hudud) but in their mendacious attempts to impose their form of “rule”, deception is employed, and increasingly these days, more vindictiveness.

          1. It’s the same trait of looking down upon others that was displayed by the Conquistadors against the many, many, many native non-Christian cultures which they wantonly destroyed.

        2. Woe to those who would be known as learned in religion but whose hearts belong not to the Lord on High; those who would yoke the necks of men with regulatory punishments whose bases they do not fathom and thus they misappropriate justice.

      2. ‘A very poor man was caught stealing food. Proven without reasonable doubts he is genuinely truly poor due to whatever reasons, stole the food to feed his hungry family.’

        The hand wont be chopped and the state will be asked to help the man and his family. God’s law is just to begin with.

        Under the current circumstances the poor man will be fine or worst, jailed. Imagine the social quagmire his poor family will be in!

        1. Those “ignorant” rich Muslim people who live among this poor man should be “chopped off” their hands first. Baru betul ….

      3. Re. A very poor man was caught stealing food. Proven without reasonable doubts he is genuinely truly poor due to whatever reasons, stole the food to feed his hungry family.

        PENCURI YANG DIKECUALIKAN DARII HUKUMAN HUDUD.

        1) Jumlah nilai harta atau barangan yang dicuri itu kurang daripada satu perempat dinar atau tiga darham.

        2) Untuk mensabitkan kesalahan mencuri itu tidak dapat dibuktikan mengikut yang dikehendaki.

        3) Pencuri itu bukan orang yang mukallaf.

        4) Tuan punya harta atau barang yang dicuri itu tidak menyimpan dan menjaga harta atau barangannya ditempat yang selamat daripada kena curi.

        5) Pencuri itu belum lagi mendapat milik yang sepenuhnya keatas harta yang dicuri itu.

        6) Harta atau barang yang dicuri itu bukan dari barangan yang berharga dan bernilai.

        7) Harta atau barangan yang dicuri itu tidak memberi apa-apa faedah dan tidak bernilai mengikut hukum syarak seperti alat hiburan atau minuman yang memabukkan.

        8) Pencurian yang dilakukan oleh orang yang memberi hutang ke atas harta atau barangan orang yang berhutang.

        9) Pencurian yang berlaku itu dalam kedaan yang mendesak seperti didalam peperangan, dimasa sangat lapar dan dahaga.

        10) Pencurian yang dilakukan oleh anak keatas harta atau barangan kepunyaan ibu bapanya hingga ke atas (datuk dan seterusnya).

        11) Pencurian yang dilakukan oleh suami keatas harta atau barangan kepunyaan isterinya dan sebaliknya.

        12) Pencuri itu mencuri harta atau barangan kepunyaan Baitul Mal.

        http://www.al-azim.com/masjid/infoislam/jinayat/mencuri.htm

      4. The complete understanding of hudud is penultimate. When hudud is mentioned – potong tangan and pancung kepala will pop up. The execution of hudud laws does not equate 1+1=2.

        Most often then not, compassion is never brought up.

        Just recently in Iran, a murderer was saved from being executed because the mother of the victim forgave the murderer and he was set free.

        Further to why the poor who stole and to be punished. Before he is punished, the executors of hudud need to ensure that the administration of zakat for the poor has been dealt with ie have they done their job efficiently. If yes, this person who stole because he was poor, should not have been in this position in the first place. Many steps have to be taken before executing the law.

        Same thing with divorce in islam. The islamic law is clear, it is the muslims that do not carry out their duties as stated. Dont blame the law because it is very clear. Blame the people for flouting the law. Sama juga dengan civil. Law dah sedia ada tapi manusia juga yang mencabar dan mencuba untuk mempersoalkan undang2 yang sedia ada.

        Dalam kedua2 jenis perundangan, manusia lah yang bebal.

        1. ‘ Blame the people for flouting the law.’

          BINGO!!!

          It is the same everywhere. It happens in man made laws too, but yet people still accept the law. The late Karpal cari makan practicing the man’s made law.

          So why are we saying no to God’s made law again?

    1. Divide and conquer, is that all the intellectuals in the west can think of Greg? Somalia, Nigeria, Sudan is a testament of the game being played over and over again.

      Hindia Timur Belanda and Hindia Timur Inggeris had being doing that, the last time they decide to plunder the Malays of their Golds and wealth’s.

      Don’t tell me, the millions being paid to Kissinger just to sing the same song over and over again. How predictable.

      Is that what they have been doing at your uni too, Greg?

      Try this, an Australian I met spoke at length at how the North can’t stand the South, telling them what to do. I say enough of that and let’s split Australia into two.

      What say you, newmandala?

      BTW is Tasmania’s a part of Australia, still?

  8. You should also read this one

    http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2014/04/23/hudud-and-the-elusive-39-votes-for-pas/

    They will do anything to mislead the people. You need 148 to pass the private bill? This is a blatant lie. You only need a simple majority of 112 to pass a bill.

    A 2/3 majority is a must only if you want to make an amendment. If the people reading this article believe wholeheartedly that Pas need 148 votes to pass the bill, then these people are really gullible beyond any reasonable doubt.

  9. Cik Helen, there are cases of injustice where implementation is concerned and that is the main worry for ordinary people like me. Take for instance;

    https://www.google.com/search?q=woman+stoned+to+death+after+being+raped

    Malaysia is still conservative where women, caya ke tak?. Even today decisions made by Mahkamah Syariah – in divorce cases, do they really enforce their rulings eg nafkah? I know of many husbands who did not comply and got away with it leaving his ex-wives and kids hidup macam pengemis.

    The distribution of assets, may it be divorce or deceased (Faraid) – one lady was noisily reading a stack of papers next to me. Very irritated she tole me, been up and down the same courtroom for the last 8 yrs. I was there when the judge read his verdict… lengthy many pages from a to z bla bla bla. At the end he stated “bukan dibawah bidang kuasa Mahkamah ini untuk membuat keputusan”.. took him 8 long years to come up with this. The lady was fuming and in tears????

    Macam2 lagi cerita yg sakit dihati… distribution of deceased properties, if you are lucky your infant may well be married by the time she can touch her inheritance left by her late papa – all the assets frozen, family struggled thru life as the poor uneducated mum had to raise 8 kids all on her own. Takyah cerita le pasai welfare, what welfare???

    ……Macam2 kerenah whereas there is a complete thick and detailed booklet outlining the process and procedures on Faraid distribution. Ada guideline, ada lawyer, ada segalanya documents but the IMPLEMENTATION, most of the time kena kelentong “dalam proses”. Nak bayar lawyer pon beribu2 just to get the sijil Faraid out, you know or not?

    Itu semua harta benda… tak kisah le lambat atau last last tak dapat pun (ramai waris meninggal dunia while waiting for all these red tapes). Masalah lagi as the process will now have to include their spouses and kids pulak dah!).

    MESSY… the same judge sampai dah beruban pun masih belum selesai fail dalam tangan dia. Tak caya go to Gombak Pusaka check his uban on the head!

    Wang ringgit bole bila-bila kita ikhtiar mencari but loosing ones kepala, tangan and life is something not to joke around with.

    1. Conclusion: manusia yang menjadikan undang2 tidak dilaksanakan dengan adil.

      Pihak lelaki diperintah untuk bayar nafkah, tetapi tidak. Salahkan undang2 ke, tidak. Kena salahkan orang atau manusia yang telah diperintahkan untuk membayar nafkah.

      Like i mentioned before. It is manusia yang bebal. Human rights movement yang actually created this kebebalan.

    2. Dalam islam ada hibbah – iaitu hadiahkan semua harta sebelum kita mati so faraid does not play a role.

      Understand in totality – quran is so clear.

      1. Re. Faraid

        2/3 bahagian untuk waris/anak lelaki dan 1/3 bahagian untuk waris/anak perempuan.

        2/3 bahagian untuk waris/anak lelaki bukan hanya untuk digunakan oleh waris/anak lelaki itu sendiri, tapi waris/anak lelaki tersebut perlu menggunakan harta peninggalan tersebut bagi menampung keperluan dirinya, ibunya dan saudara-saudara perempuan yang belum berkahwin. Ini yang selalu dilupakan atau tidak difahami oleh hampir setiap lelaki Muslim.

        1/3 bahagian untuk waris/anak perempuan adalah untuk dirinya sahaja dan tidak perlu dikongsi dengan ahli keluarga yang lain.

        Anak angkat tidak layak menerima harta pusaka melalui Faraid, didalam hal ini hak mereka dilindungi melalui hibah.

      2. Contoh yg diberi dari segi Nafkah dan Pembahagian Harta Pusaka simati is just a tiny eg of existing practices that is so full of weaknesses and similar problems faced year after year without any signs of improvement to simplify procedures.

        Memang segalanya sudah tertulis dan tersedia ada TETAPI dari segi IMPLIMENTASI apakah PAS dah benar2 READY, GET SET AND GO…., itu le jadi tanda soal saya. Nanti ready, get set tak kemana asyik nak Go aje masalah le….macam Selangor bagi air percuma, last2 dah kalut catur pulak dah…

        1. I am not going to comment about PAS’s readiness on the implementation issue. But it is very important for us as Muslim to understand about hudud first. I have posted a good write-up on ‘Salah Faham Tentang Hudud’, please take sometime to read it.

          As Muslim society we will be forever not ready for everything wrt Islam and that is given (including myself), but it is very crucial for us to slowly moving towards that by first making an effort to learn and understand it, then progressively supporting it until it is fully implemented. Brunei has paved the way on this side of of the world by progressively implementing it and there is no reason why we should not follow suit.

          Menegakkan hukum Islam bukan tangungungjawab PAS semata, tapi adalah tanggungjawab kita bersama sebagai seorang Muslim.

          1. ‘Menegakkan hukum Islam bukan tangungungjawab PAS semata, tapi adalah tanggungjawab kita bersama sebagai seorang Muslim.’

            Kalau PAS khilaf, kita kena terlibat secara aktif dengan cadangan bernas untuk menambah baik pelaksanaan Hudud kelak, supaya Agama dan Bangsa tidak terfitnah kelak.

            Sukar untuk dilakukan di Zaman Fitan, tapi kita sememangnya perlu berusaha, semestinya perbuatan baik kita akan dibantu Allah SWT.

            Cadangan UMNO untuk mengadakan jawatankuasa bersama teknikal pelaksanaan Hudud merupakan satu langkah yang baik dan betul. Membangkang membuta tuli tidak!

        2. Re. Contoh yg diberi dari segi Nafkah dan Pembahagian Harta Pusaka simati is just a tiny eg of existing practices that is so full of weaknesses and similar problems faced year after year without any signs of improvement to simplify procedures

          Masaalah timbul apabila tiadanya wasiat ditinggalkan oleh simati. Itu sebabnya kita semuanya digalakkan membuat wasiat ketika masih sihat dan waras. Apabila kejadian mati mengejut atau mati tanpa meninggalkan wasiat berlaku, masaalah demi masaalah menimpa terutamanya sekiranya simati mempunyai banyak harta dan ramai ahli keluarga.

          Masaalah pembahagian harta pusaka tanpa wasiat bukan hanya terkongkong pada masyarakat Muslim sahaja, malahan ianya terjadi diserata dunia dan dalam pelbagai masyarakat, budaya, bangsa dan agama.

          p.s

          Pastikan anda semua meletakkan penama bagi caruman EPF anda, sekiranya tidak,apabila anda meninggal dunia wang EPF tersebut akan diserahkan pada Amanah Raya, dan akan mengambil masa yang lama untuk dikeluarkan.

  10. Salah Faham Tenntang Hudud – Part 1

    Salah faham yang pertama ialah apabila ada menganggap bahawa persoalan Hudud merupakan persoalan yang hanya dikaitkan secara ekslusif dengan golongan ekstrimis Islam. Padahal Hudud merupakan perkara asas dalam persoalan keimanan dan tauhid kepada Allah SWT. Hukum Hudud telah dinyatakan secara jelas di dalam Quran dan Sunnah. Setiap muslim wajib menerima kewajiban Hudud untuk dilaksanakan di kalangan masyarakat Islam.

    Hujjah yang mengatakan bahawa Hudud tidak lagi sesuai dengan perkembangan zaman moden adalah hujjah yang dangkal. Sekiranya Hudud ketinggalan zaman, maka begitu jugalah halnya dengan semua hukum syariat yang lain seperti hukum solat, puasa, haji, nikah kahwin, dan jual beli. Kesemua hukum-hukum ini juga dinyatakan secara jelas oleh Al-Quran dan Sunnah.

    Contohnya, lelaki yang adil bukan hanya perlu sebagai saksi-saksi dalam pengendalian kes-kes jenayah Hudud, tetapi juga sebagai wali nikah dan imam solat. Maka itu, andaian yang mengatakan bahawa amat sukar untuk mendapatkan saksi yang adil untuk menjadi saksi kes Hudud sebenarnya juga seolah-olah mengandaikan bahawa hukum nikah kahwin dan solat berjemaah tidak lagi perlu dipraktikkan oleh umat Islam sekarang. Tentunya ini merupakan andaian yang liar dan tidak benar.

    Sekiranya Hudud mahu dilabelkan sebagai agenda golongan ekstrimis Islam, maka apakah semua orang yang bernikah kahwin mengikut syariat dan bersolat jamaah juga perlu dilabelkan sebagai ekstrimis Islam? Maka, siapa lagi sebenarnya di kalangan umat Islam yang bukan ekstrimis melainkan kesemua muslim yang baik akan digelar ekstrimis Islam belaka.

    Salah faham seterusnya ialah apabila kita melihat hukum Hudud dalam bentuknya yang juz’i (stand alone) yang terpisah dari sistem jenayah syariah Islam secara keseluruhan. Islam adalah sistem yang lengkap dan saling melengkapi (kamil wa mutakamil). Setiap elemen dari ajaran Islam tidak boleh diceraikan dari keseluruhan batang tubuh Islam itu sendiri, dan begitu jugalah halnya dengan hukum Hudud. Hukum Hudud dalam bentuknya yang juz’i (stand alone) tidak akan mampu melahirkan keadilan, dan keadaan ini telah dipergunakan sepenuhnya oleh golongan penentang Hudud untuk menggambarkan bahawa Hudud adalah zalim. Mereka menilai Hudud dalam bentuknya yang terpisah dari keseluruhan sistem kehakiman dan perundangan Islam, dan sememangnya Hudud yang diambil secara juz’i ini boleh disifatkan sebagai tidak adil atau zalim.

    Contoh yang selalu dikemukakan adalah persoalan rogol. Dalam hukum Hudud, jenayah rogol adalah disamakan dengan jenayah zina. Tahap kesaksian dan hukumannya juga sama. Dalam Hudud juga, menuduh seseorang yang dikenali sebagai orang baik melakukan zina tanpa mendatangkan saksi yang berwibawa merupakan suatu kesalahan Qazaf yang boleh membawa hukuman sebanyak 80 rotan. Lalu diambil peruntukan-peruntukan hudud ini secara terpisah oleh penentang Hudud untuk menggambar betapa mangsa rogol akan dizalimi.Mereka mengandaikan bahawa seorang mangsa rogol perlu mendatang 4 orang saksi lelaki yang adil untuk membuat pengaduan atau menghadapi risiko kesalahan Qazaf. Ini, menurut andaian mereka, adalah menzalimi mangsa rogol dan melindungi perogol. Padahal, undang-undang yang melibatkan kes rogol perlu dirujuk kepada keseluruhan peruntukan undang-undang jenayah syariah secara lengkap (Hudud, Qisas, Takzir, Undang-undang keterangan, siasah syari’ah) dan tidak boleh dinilai dari perspektif hukum Hudud secara terhad dan terpisah.

    Credit: http://pekanrabu.com.my/zubir/hudud.html

  11. Salah Faham Tentang Hudud – Part 2

    Seseorang yang mengadu dirinya dirogol, sepertimana kes-kes biasa, perlu membuat lapuran polis dan melakukan pemeriksaan doktor. Ini prosedur biasa. Polis atau pegawai penyiasat akan melakukan penyiasatan berdasarkan lapuran dan keterangan yang diberikan. Sekiranya terdapat bukti yang kukuh bahawa kes rogol sememangnya telah berlaku, pegawai penyiasat akan menyerahkan lapuran kepada pihak pendakwa.

    Sekiranya tahap kesaksian untuk pendakwaan dilakukan dalam hukum Hudud tidak mencukupi (tiada 4 orang saksi yang melihat kejadian tersebut), pihak pendakwa masih boleh mendakwanya di bawah undang-undang Takzir. Melalui peruntukan Takzir, beban pembuktian adalah lebih longgar dan hukumannya juga lebih ringan berbanding Hudud. Pemeriksaan doktor dan keterangan-keterangan serta bukti-bukti yang dikumpulkan oleh polis ini (DNA test, lapuran kesihatan, penilaian psychology, dll) dinamakan sebagai Qarinah. Qarinah boleh digunakan sebagai bahan bukti yang boleh mensabitkan kesalahan takzir ke atas perogol. Qarinah ini juga boleh mengelakkan mangsa rogol dari dakwaan Qazaf, kerana Qazaf merupakan kesalahan Hudud dan sebarang keraguan yang boleh ditimbulkan (melalui Qarinah) dalam kes Hudud boleh menggugurkan kes tersebut. Hukuman Hudud boleh dilakukan ke atas seseorang hanya apabila tiada sebarang keraguan langsung (beyond any shadow of doubt). Manakala untuk kesalahan yang boleh dibuktikan secara jelas oleh Qarinah, tetapi tidak mencapai tahap kesaksian yang diperlukan oleh Hudud, hukum Takzir boleh dikenakan terhadap penjenayah tersebut.

    Mengaitkan Qazaf dengan kes rogol secara mutlak adalah suatu andaian yang liar dan tidak adil. Hukum Qazaf berfungsi untuk melindungi maruah seseorang individu yang baik dari sebarang tuduhan melulu yang boleh menjatuhkan maruah diri dan keluarganya. Sekiranya, seseorang itu menuduh dirinya dirogol oleh seseorang, sedangkan bukti dan keterangan (Qarinah) yang dibawa menunjukkan sebaliknya, barulah ia boleh didakwa di bawah Qazaf. Contohnya, Minah menuduh Ali merogolnya sehingga mengandung, tetapi ujian DNA menunjukkan bahawa anak tersebut bukanlah dari benih Ali, maka Minah akan menghadapi risiko dakwaan Qazaf melainkan ada 4 orang saksi yang berwibawa yang melihat kejadian rogol tersebut, ataupun dapat dibuktikan secara Qarinah bahawa dia dirogol oleh ramai orang dan Ali adalah salah seorang daripada mereka. Tetapi, sekiranya ujian DNA mengesahkan bahawa anak tersebut memang jelas dari benih Ali, maka Ali boleh didakwa di bawah peruntukan Takzir, manakala Minah tidak akan dihukum di bawah Qazaf. Dalam kes ini, Ali tidak didakwa di bawah Hudud kerana tahap kesaksian tidak menepati kehendak hukum Hudud, sebaliknya beliau akan dihukum di bawah undang-undang Takzir.

    Dalam kata lain, sekiranya perkara ini dirujuk kepada keseluruhan rang undang-undang Hudud, Qisas, Takzir, Undang-Undang Keterangan, dan ditambah dengan kefahaman terhadap konsep Siasah Syariah, maka segala keraguan dan andaian liar terhadap Hudud atau mana-mana peruntukan dalam hukum Jenayah Syariah tidak sepatutnya berlaku.

    Ibarat kata Tun Salleh Abbas, bekas Ketua Hakim Negara, yang juga salah seorang ahli panel Jawatankuasa Penyediaan Rang Undang-Undang Hudud dan Qisas, ” Sekiranya undang-undang ini dilaksanakan dengan mendapatkan kerjasama semua pihak, kebanyakan masalah yang melibatkan sistem Perundangan dan Kehakiman negara dapat diselesaikan, di samping mencapai matlamat mengurangkan kadar jenayah dan kerosakan akhlak.”

    Kesilapan melihat peruntukan hukum jenayah syariah dalam bentuknya yang stand alone (juz’i) ini juga berlaku kepada pengkritik hukum Qisas. Mengikut peruntukan hukum Qisas, seorang pembunuh itu wajib dibalas bunuh melainkan beliau mendapat persetujuan dari waris mangsa untuk membayar diyat (gantirugi), ataupun pengampunan terus dari waris mangsa. Andaian yang sering dibuat oleh penentang Qisas ialah bahawa seorang pembunuh yang kejam dan merbahaya akan terlepas dari hukuman sekiranya waris mangsa bersetuju mendapat bayaran ganti rugi atau mengampunkan pembunuh tersebut. Sekiranya ini berlaku, pembunuh itu boleh terus membunuh mangsa-mangsa yang lain.

    Sekiranya kita membaca peruntukan tersebut secara lengkap dan bersama dengan peruntukan-peruntukan yang lain, sebenarnya Hakim masih boleh menjatuhkan hukuman Takzir ke atas pembunuh itu, di samping hukum Qisas sekiranya pihak Mahkamah bersetuju bahawa pembunuh tersebut perlu dihukum bagi menjamin ketenteraman awam. Dalam kata lain, walaupun pembunuh tersebut mendapat pengampunan dari waris mangsa dari dijatuhkan hukuman bunuh balas (Qisas), beliau masih boleh dihukum penjara atau hukuman-hukuman lain yang setimpal dengan kesalahannya. Jadi, tidak timbul persoalan samada seseorang penjenayah itu dengan mudah boleh melepaskan diri dengan memberi rasuah kepada waris mangsa.

    Credit : http://pekanrabu.com.my/zubir/hudud.html

  12. Salah Faham Tentang Hudud – Part 3

    Seperkara lagi yang sering diabaikan dalam perbahasan berkenaan Hudud ialah peri pentingnya kefahaman terhadap Siasah Syar’iah di dalam perlaksanaan Undang-Undang Jenayah Syariah. Kebanyakan mereka yang menentang Undang-Undang Hudud dan Qisas adalah terdiri dari kalangan mereka yang mempunyai kefahaman yang sangat terhad terhadap Siasah Syari’ah. Siasah Syar’iah amat penting bagi menghadapi kes-kes yang rumit dan spesifik. Para Hakim dan Peguam Syari’ah adalah mereka yang terlatih di dalam ilmu Siasah Syari’ah. Ini penting agar keadilan sistem perundangan Islam dapat dilaksanakan.

    Umpamanya penentang Hudud mempersoalkan tentang keperluan saksi lelaki di dalam kes-kes Hudud, dan bagaimana sekiranya kejadian rogol dilakukan di asrama wanita. Kes seperti ini boleh dirujuk kembali kepada perbicaraan terhadap pembunuhan Osman bin Affan, salah seorang Khalifah Islam. Saksi kepada pembunuhan tersebut ialah isteri Osman sendiri, dan tiada saksi lelaki. Hakim, menggunakan kaedah Siasah Syari’ah bagi membenarkan kesaksian dari kaum wanita kerana kes-kes tersebut memerlukan kesaksian mereka. Oleh kerana kesaksian beliau cukup kukuh dan tidak dapat dicabar di mahkamah, maka kesaksian tersebut diterima di dalam perbicaraan itu.

    Begitulah juga dengan peristiwa yang berlaku di zaman pemerintahan Islam di mana terdapat seorang gadis yang mengandung lalu dibawa ke muka pengadilan. Gadis itu mempertahankan dirinya menyatakan bahawa beliau tidak tahu sesiapa yang merogolnya, tetapi menyebut bahawa beliau adalah seorang yang terlalu kuat tidur sehingga tidak sedar jika diperlakukan sesuatu yang tidak baik ke atasnya. Memandangkan kes ini jarang berlaku, hakim telah membenarkan tertuduh mengemukakan beberapa saksi yang boleh mengesahkan dakwaannya bahawa beliau adalah seorang yang terlalu kuat tidur. Setelah hakim berpuas hati dengan kesaksian bahawa gadis tersebut memang dikenali sebagai seorang wanita yang taat beragama serta berakhlak baik, dan kesaksian bahawa beliau memang seorang yang terlalu kuat tidur sehingga tidak sedar diperlakukan sesuatu ke atasnya ketika sedang tidur, maka hakim telah menggugurkan kes tersebut kerana terdapat keraguan yang munasabah bahawa gadis tersebut telah berzina secara sukarela.

    Bagi mereka yang memahami persoalan Siasah Syar’iah secara mendalam, Hukum Hudud merupakan suatu sistem perundangan yang adil dan dinamik yang mampu menangani persoalan semasa selari dengan kemajuan saintifik dan perkembangan sosio-ekonomi masyarakat. Sebenarnya, terlalu banyak kes-kes penghakiman di dalam sistem perundangan Islam yang mempu membuktikan bahawa sistem ini merupakan sistem yang adil dan dinamik, di samping menepati kehendak syara’ seperti yang telah digariskan oleh Al-Quran dan Sunnah.

    Umpamanya, kes rogol mungkin tidak berlaku paksaan secara fizikal semata-mata. Ia juga boleh berlaku melalui tipu muslihat lain seperti kaedah tekanan mental, perasaan, dan lain-lain. Seorang mangsa rogol umpamanya mungkin terpaksa menyerahkan dirinya kepada seseorang yang dianggap lebih berkuasa dan berpengaruh serta boleh menjejaskan kehidupan keluarganya dalam pelbagai sudut. Pembuktian kes-kes seperti tentunya lebih rumit dan memerlukan pendekatan Siasah Syari’ah yang lebih mendalam. Bagaimanapun, tentulah dangkal dan tidak benar untuk mengatakan bahawa hukum Islam telah ketinggalan zaman sedangkan ianya telah terbukti mampu menjadi tunggak kehakiman ummah selama lebih seribu tahun sejak terdirinya kerajaan Islam di Madinah sehinggalah kepada kejatuhan Khalifah Othmaniah pada tahun 1924.

    Apa yang menjadi masalah ialah ramai umat Islam hari ini yang sudah terpisah dengan pengamalan syariat Islam sehingga merasa cukup asing dan melihat hukum syariah dengan penuh prejudis dan kecurigaan, sedangkan mereka tidak mempunyai kefahaman yang mendalam berkenaan ilmu tersebut. Apatah lagi apabila masyarakat bukan Islam yang juga cuba menilai hukum ini dengan keilmuan sifar, secara tidak beradab mencela dan menghina hukum Islam. Wallahua’lam.

    Credit : http://pekanrabu.com.my/zubir/hudud.html

  13. Macam org duduk di riba santa tatkala obama ada di kl tempoh hari puak puak tak malu ni

    Apa locus standing yg obama ada di bumi malaysia ini, ibarat si petualang menjemput campurtangan asing dalam hal ehwal rumahtangga sendiri, ibarat si pengkhianat mencipta alasan untuk campurtangan british hingga memnyebabkan perjanjian pangkor dan memaksa perak menerima residen british

    Si petualang petualang ini persis si pengkhianat yg boleh di apa ya ikut hudud

    Wahai si leong bar council apa ke hal yg awak mengadu pasal hudud tu ke obama.. sungguh tak faham

    1. Re. Si petualang petualang ini persis si pengkhianat yg boleh di apa ya ikut hudud

      Treason in any society is punishable by death across the world.

        1. LEONG dan sewaktu dengannya patut kena SULA. Sama juga budak-budak yang panggil Obama campur tangan urusan dalaman Malaysia. One Opp leader tentu suka kena SULA sebab tu la selalu main Australia, Amerika, EU segala!

Comments are closed.