People around the world love dogs.
Below are photos of Vladimir Putin, the President of Russia with his. Here is one where he is jumped by Koni (Connie), the black Labrador possibly named after Condoleeza Rice — the former black USA Secretary of State.
Below is Putin with Buffy, his Bulgarian shepherd dog, and Yume, an Akita Inu. [More pictures here.]
Poodles, however, are not compatible with Putin’s macho image. So it is made out that the poodles are actually the pets belonging to his (now divorced) wife.
The poodle on Putin’s lap looks like Mick Jagger, somewhat. Despite the sissyness of poodles, Putin nonetheless allows himself to be kissed.
There is even a “My dog is bigger than your dog” rivalry of sorts between the world’s most powerful presidents.
G.W. Bush’s dog is Barney, a Scottish terrier, whose size did not impress Putin much as befitting the stature of the POTUS.
Later when it was Bush’s turn to visit Putin in Russia, the latter said to the American president, “Would you like to meet my dog?” And out bounds Koni.
“Bigger, stronger and faster than Barney”, Putin deadpans to Bush. — Story in USA Today, (4 April 2014)
Below is Suzie. She is my dog.
She’s 75 and now sleeping beside my chair as I type this.
The photo of her is when she was younger.
In the background you can see her green water flask which I take along when we go for our walks.
Beside the flask is Suzie’s toy box. Among her toys is a plush monkey missing an arm and a leg, which I came across when spring cleaning the other day. I decided not to throw away Suzie’s monkey … for sentimental reasons.
.
CAUTION
.
As promised previously to my squeamish readers, you are warned that the next photograph may upset you although you’re quite likely to have seen the photos already in The J-Star, The Malay Mail and other media.
It is the partially blind dog that was shot in Balakong.
—->
Scroll down
—->
Scroll down
—->
—->
Scroll down
Now look carefully at the photograph.
The man holding the bow had shot the dog callously in cold blood at between 8.30 to 9.00pm on Tuesday night (May 13).
The gate of his house (behind him) in Taman Sinaran, Taming Jaya is securely closed.
He claimed that he shot the dog because it would not leave his gate.
He had shot two arrows at the dog before his neighbour intervened in time to prevent him from shooting the third.
The photo shows the dog with one arrow lodged in its back and one in the leg. The arrow in the back penetrated deeply (you can compare its length showing with the length of the other arrow in the leg).
The dog is old and under-nourished. And half blind.
It was not a threat to anyone’s safety.
If it had been an active or agile dog, it would not have just stood there to be shot twice. It would have run away.
That it did not run away was because it was blind.
And it was loitering at the man’s gate was because it was likely lost.
This is the culprit.
If his gate was securely closed – it was near to 9pm – then he can’t use the excuse that the dog posed any clear and immediate danger to his family.
The dog’s rescuer rushed her to the vet. The vet said that from his examination, the dog had a bad hip and was sickly. That’s why she did not move away and kept standing in the same spot.
This man is a danger to society because he misused an offensive weapon. Dan dia tak pakai otak. If the arrows strayed, then any bystanders (including children) could have been accidentally injured.
And if he really wanted to shoo the dog away, he could have used a water hose. Even though this is unkind and heartless, at least it is not lethal and does not cause the kind of pain inflicted on a sick, elderly dog to be pierced by arrows.
(The vet estimated it to be around 12 years old or 89 in dog years for its breed.)
The man claimed that he acted on impulse and in panic fearing for the safety of his children.
Taking out a third arrow to coolly aim and shoot an 89-year-old, half-blind dog – which was not moving – for a third round, is not acting on impulse nor panic.
The dog has succumbed to its injuries and tick fever.
Sick behaviour boils down to an attitude problem in our Malaysian society that tolerates flimsy excuses for cruelty to animals.
Police must charge him for animal abuse.
There has to be enough societal outrage so that the police don’t cop out on this one.
Details at the Malaysian Dogs Deserve Better.
Helen Ang 
Helen.. saya malu la.. I frequently dress like the man who shot the arrow at the dog.
I believe the man is heartless, I on the other hand would never do such thing. Although I dont handle or pet dogs but I believe they are good animals. Maybe this guy is a Dapster !
So sad to read this, Helen.
the asshole is a bastard in the highest degree.
btw is that a cross bow arror? does he have a licence for a crossbow?
or is our kdn and police handing out licences to any tom, dick and harry on a silver platter.
Too late, they already copped out.
Read last night that he was “unlikely to be charged ” !
We apply public pressure, bottom up. Signal to the politicians to heed public outrage which cuts across race and religion.
Helen, saya juga merasakan perbuatan lelaki ini adalah keterlaluan dan amat memalukan. Anjing juga adalah makhluk tuhan sama seperti haiwan- haiwan lain. Tindakan tegas keatas lelaki ini adalah perlu sebagai pengajaran. :-(
Hello Helen…
Saya pun tak tahu nak cakap apa dah… Mangkuk ayun yang suka memanah binatang ni memang tak tahu langsung pasal anjing… Malah jika Helen tanya pada saya pun, saya sendiri tak tahu apa-apa pasal anjing…
Cuma bagi saya daripada dia memanah anjing tu, baik dia halau anjing tu dengan cara yang lebih baik… Tapi bila dia panah anjing tu memang nampak sangat la dia tu ganas dan berperikesetanan…
Nak diundurkan masa memang dah tak boleh dah… Cuma apa yang telah berlaku ni seharusnya dijadikan iktibar pada kita semua…
If no one lodges a police report, he will get away with it. He should be fined and jailed like the guy in PJ who poured hot water on a dog. I can’t fathom why would anyone be that cruel. The dog may be tired, hungry and thirsty during that time.
Earlier this year, my sister who lives in PJ asked me to call the city council to get rid of the stray dogs around her area. It is not that she hates them, but she has this phobia about animals, especially cat and dogs for as long as I can remember. A new born kitten is a major No No for her, she would scream her lungs out if you try to put the kitten near her. A simple spiritual and religious advice has changed her mind about the stray dogs i.e. “Anjing-anjing tu kan mahluk Allah. Buat apa nak buat aniaya pada mereka. bukan dia minta makan dan usik kita pun. Lagi pun kalau panggil majlis bandaran, dia orang akan tangkap anjing-anjing tu dan inject kasi mati atau pun tembak terus. Siapa yang akan tanggung dosa tu semua?’. Since then she has stopped complaining.
Nasihat ini adalah bagi Melayu Totok yang sejak dari kecil dah dibiasakan takut dengan anjing, terutamanya masa zaman budak-budak yang pantang nampak anjing, yang mana mereka akan terus lari atau ambil batu, kayu dan selipar untuk baling dan halau anjing tersebut.
1. Anjing-anjing liar yang berkeliaran biasanya akan mengikut anda sekiranya anda adalah orang luar dan bukan dari kawasan tersebut, bagi mereka andalah penceroboh dikawasan tersebut;
2. Sekiranya anda menunjukkan rasa takut dan bimbang, anjing-anjing liar tersebut akan menunjukkan riaksi aggresif sebagai balasan. Itu adalah langkah berjaga-jaga mereka;
3. Sekiranya anda lari, mereka akan mengejar dan terus menyerang anda;
4. Jadi apakah pilihan anda:
a. Sekiranya anda bersikap tenang dan tidak menghindarkan mereka, mereka juga akan melakukan pekara yang sama;
b. Bagi mereka yang memang takut anjing memang menjadi satu masaalah besar, jalan mudah adalah dengan membaca surah Tabbat Yada, atau :
Quote “Qitmir ini adalah nama anjing ashabul kahfi. Qitmir adalah satu-satunya anjing yang ada disyurga kelak, Qitmir ini juga adalah Raja Segala Anjing. Qitmir, anjing yang menemani perjuangan 7 orang pemuda dalam mempertahankan keyakinannya. Meskipun anjing merupakan binatang najis, tapi ia dimuliakan oleh Allah SWT.
Ustaz-ustaz dan para ulama juga banyak bercerita tentang cerita seekor raja anjing bernama Qitmir ini. Mereka juga pernah berpesan apabila di saat ketika kita mempunyai masalah dengan anjing misalnya dikejar oleh anjing atau terserempak dengan anjing, maka hendaklah kita jangan takut kepadanya dan perasaan takut itu hanyalah kepada Allah S.W.T, dan menyebut atau menjerit atau pun menjerkah anjing tersebut dengan nama ”QITMIR!!”. Mana-mana anjing pun yang tak pernah berjumpa dengan Qitmir, tahu dan kenal dengan raja anjing tersebut. Ini lah bukti kekuasaan Allah sedangkan kita sendiri terfikir bagaimanakah anjing-anjing didunia ini yang tak pernah berjumpa pun dengan raja anjing tersebut tetapi mengenalinya. Setelah dijerkah dengan nama Qitmir, anjing yang mengejar itu insyaAllah menjadi ketakutan dan tidak lagi mengejar. Ia menunjukkan seperti orang yang menjerkah itulah tuan kepada Qitmir’ Unquote
Note: Yang saya pernah belajar anda juga boleh menyebut ‘Qitmir kirim salam’ dan In Syaa Allah anjing-anjing liar itu tidak akan menganggu anda.
http://www.gempak.org/forum/117-tentang-agama/125636-qitmir-raja-segala-anjing-dan-cara-untuk-mengelakkan-dikejar-anjing.html
Sila rujuk artikel dibawah ini:
Balasan Neraka bagi mereka yang menyeksa binatang.
http://meowwmania.blogspot.com/2011/07/awas-menyeksa-binatang-menempah-neraka.html
Mungkin rahsia itu diguna oleh “the whisperer” agaknya! menjinak anjing.
Tindakan memanah anjing tidak bijak. Mana otak org tu agaknya.
I’ve been in a situation before when I was alone and terserempak a pack of stray dogs.
I stood very still and waited it out while they circled and eventually went away. I was not hurt.
On the other hand, Malays due to their lack of cultural exposure and friendly contact with dogs may not know what to do in emergency situations. The key is to keep calm.
Perhaps public education like short clips over TV, in the newspapers etc can be undertaken by the govt.
Here are the tips on what to do and what not to do.
AVERTING A DOG ATTACK
Read more, http://www.hvoc.org/docs/Beginner_II_Handout_Supplement.pdf
Google …
Is that bow man a dapster? Gent Sama with the china guys killing the dog as posted by you previously…. ha ha ha. God teaches everyone in mysterious ways, including you.
Lain kali jangan memandai kutuk bangsa lain…
Hi, Helen. A similar situation happened to me. I had two stray dogs coming after me, but I stood still. I didn’t run away as the dogs will think that I am a prey or something. Although I had an umbrella with me at the time since I regularly commute by public transportation, I didn’t shoo the dogs away or beat them etc. I even calmed the stray dogs in a soothing tone and they backed off.
My elder sister used to feed the stray dogs nearby my home (that was before the authorities took the dogs away) and you know something? Those stray dogs chased practically everyone who passed by my home except my family and my cats. They didn’t even attack the stray cats that feed regularly at my home – it goes to show how smart dogs are that they even tolerate cats since the dogs also ‘tumpang makan’ at my home. And we are all Muslims.
What’s with the people these days that they abuse animals? It’s really sad whenever I have to read articles such as these.
melayu semua tahu, teknik mengelak anjing liar. penipu kalau dah tua bangka mcm lebai tu tak tahu… dia memang suka membunuh binatang.
jangan babitkan kemelayuan dia dengan tindakan. jika dia menghayati dan mempraktik Islam dengan betul, dia takkan mendera binatang, walaupun anjing atau babi sekalipun. dia ni patut dikenakan tindakan undang2.
Okay, I get you.
Alasan Pak Lebai tua bangka itu bahawa dia tak reti nak mengelak anjing liar sebenarnya tidak boleh dipakai. Tipu belaka.
I also think so.
Dia seorang Pak Lebai……?
Buruknya perangai kerana memanah anjing yang malang itu.
Buruknya perangai kerana menipu konon terpaksa panah anjing tu untuk tujuan keselamatan.
Buruknya perangai kerana cakap bohong tanpa rasa berdosa.
Martabat orang begini tidaklah lebih mulia daripada anjing tua yang telah beliau zalimi.
Bayangkan kalau satu hari nanti beliau dipanah kerana ada orang kata dia membahayakan masyarakat?
re: “Buruknya perangai kerana menipu konon terpaksa panah anjing tu untuk tujuan keselamatan.”
Cuba lihat pada kepala anak panah. Kedua-duanya menghala arah berlainan.
Bermaksud sama ada anjing itu sudah mengundur ataupun si pemanah memburu anjing itu dan menembaknya untuk kali kedua.
re: “Buruknya perangai kerana cakap bohong tanpa rasa berdosa.”
Harap-harap janganlah orang awam masih lagi menegakkan benang basah demi mempertahankan cerita rekayesanya.
re: “Harap-harap janganlah orang awam masih lagi menegakkan benang basah demi mempertahankan cerita rekayesanya”.
al-Marhum guru saya pernah mengingatkan saya satu ketika dulu bahawa pada zaman ini, manusia berbohong macam makan nasi. mereka berbohong sebaik celik mata dari tidur, berbohong setiap waktu sehinggalah mata dipejam untuk tidur. semua itu dilakukan tanpa sedikitpun perasaan rasa berdosa.
amat jelas dengan kes ini di mana perbuatan jahat sering cuba diselindungkan dengan cakap bohong.
dan cakap bohong seolah-olah budaya yang tidak terpisahkan dengan kehidupan.
wallahua’lam.
Dah tak tau nak kata apa. He is a complete moron. Is it okay by the law to possess those weapon at home? He needs to get his head examined.
Kopiah putih bersih tapi hati kotor. Kalau binatang tu menakutkan dia atau dia takut binatang tu membahayakan dia atau keluarga dia, panggil aje lah PBT atau pihak berkuasa yang berkaitan.
Bukannya menjadikan anjing tu target practice. Memanglah orang Islam anggap anjing ni sebagai kotor tetapi dia masih makhluk tuhan yang perlu di layan dengan perikemanusiaan.
Ayah saya tinggal bersebelahan jiran India yang membela anjing tetapi tuan dia selalu tiada di rumah dan anjingnya selalu kelaparan. Ayah saya selalu beli roti dan campakkan ke laman jiran ru supaya anjing tu ada sesuatu nak makan. Dah la kena ikat pastu takde orang nak bagi makan pulak tu.
Kesian betul la tengok anjing tu..
Hi Ms Helen, like the saying goes “when dog bites man, it is no news. But when man bites dog, that’s news”.
Looking from a different perspective, i think the man had to do what he had done under that circumstances. Don’t get me wrong, it’s not that I condone his action cos there are other ways and means to get rid of that unlucky dog from doing any harm.
You see Ms Helen, at this point I am typing this comment, i do not see any other comments yet. I believe there would be negative statements coming from all “dogs and daps lovers” judging by who the culprit is as depicted in the photos above. You see, public tend to react negatively when seeing someone in white skull cap could do such thing.
You see, public in general, would scream out loud to the symptoms they see or perceived but they forgot that who are the root cause to lead to the demise of the sickly beast. According to the newspaper report that particular dog wore a collar, if it is a licence collar then the authorities should also penalise the owner for being irresponsible and not doing anything to help the dog since at that tragic incident the dog is found blind and sickly as reported.
Who would normally breed dogs as pets?, definitely not someone who normally had white skull cap on would it?.
Who would normally like to twist the truth of the matter and highlight only the reactions but not the actions that lead to the circumstances?. Please go and figure it out as these are the kind of news that we read everyday in social news portals that are to deceive the public and breed hatred.
Its the root cause that need to be analysed further not solely the symptoms.
I agree with you that the dog is wearing a collar and appears to be neglected. If the owner abandoned it, then the individual is equally at fault. I won’t bother to make any excuses for him.
But this back story is still samar-samar (something which we cannot ascertain). Due to its blindness, it’s quite possible that dog wondered away from home by mistake.
And a “Lost Dog” is a normal phenomena. We see posters pasted at lamp posts and traffic lights about dogs which are lost and with the owner offering a reward for its return.
The immediate factor, nonetheless, in this case which we can ascertain is that this man took out a bow and arrows from the place where he normally keeps his bow and arrow.
Kalau ada anak-anak kecil di rumah seperti yang didakwa ayah mereka, takkanlah dia letak sahaja alat merbahaya itu di atas meja makan. Mesti ia dikunci dalam almari supaya tidak diusik kanak-kanak.
If he was in a panic and acted on impulse, would he have deliberately gone to fetch his bow and arrow?
He made 3 decisions:
(1) He fetched his weapon and he aimed and shot the dog. The first shot might be the one that hit the leg.
(2) Then he strung his bow and shot again. This time the aim was better and he hit the creature square in the back.
(3) By now the dog is already incapacitated with two arrows lodged in its body. Like Urb commented above, he used the dog as TARGET PRACTICE because he wanted to shoot a third time, and this was prevented by the neighbour.
Whatever the dog’s past history, are not (1) and (2) and (3) each of which are conscious acts carried out with intent and purpose to torture?
‘the man had to do what he had done under that circumstances. Don’t get me wrong’
kalau orang kena isa kot?. don’t misunderstand me either.
Kejiranan tak patut bela kucing & anjing. Tahi & kencing & bising. Gangguan. Tapi memang ada hadis suruh bunuh anjing. Jika anti hadis nanti salah pula
Awak ni selalu bagi komen mengelirukan dan mengarut. Cuba tunjuk mana hadis yang suruh anjing dibunuh tu?
Bila tunjuk hadis nanti alasan lain pula. Mungkin anda rasa amat malu.
ade ke hadis suruh bunoh anjing… kau jangan buat lawak
Dressed like a religious man…..
Yet acted like a ………
This is not something new. It occurred in the past too but with social media nowadays, we frequently read of such stories.
The man is a disgrace.
Ramai manusia tak stabil. Mereka kata zalim panah anjing. Tapi mereka kata tak zalim rejam manusia sampai mati. Padahal keduanya ada hadis berkaitan.
http://sunnah.com/tirmidhi/18/28
http://sunnah.com/bukhari/86/49
Nak tafsir hadis ni bukannya kau boleh baca dan menulis terus ada kelayakan nak tafsir hadis. Belajar agama tinggi sikit baru la boleh tunjuk lagak nak ajar orang ramai tentang isi dan pengajaran hadis sahih.
Kau tu yang tak stabil mental.
Belakang pedang jika diasah lagikan tajam.
Aku pun dah keliru nii… Itu hadis lama ataupun fatwa baru. He heh… Teringin jugak nak belajar berfikir cara Islam Liberal (?)
Re. http://sunnah.com/bukhari/86/49
Chapter: The Rajm at the Musalla, Narrated Jabir:
A man from the tribe of Aslam came to the Prophet (ﷺ) and confessed that he had committed an illegal sexual intercourse. The Prophet (ﷺ) turned his face away from him till the man bore witness against himself four times. The Prophet (ﷺ) said to him, “Are you mad?” He said “No.” He said, “Are you married?” He said, “Yes.” Then the Prophet (ﷺ) ordered that he be stoned to death, and he was stoned to death at the Musalla. When the stones troubled him, he fled, but he was caught and was stoned till he died. The Prophet (ﷺ) spoke well of him and offered his funeral prayer.
Note. This Hadith is about Hudud for Zina. Not about a dog.
Re. http://sunnah.com/tirmidhi/18/28
Chapter: What Has Been Related About Killing Dogs
Narrated ‘Abdullah bin Mughaffal:
That the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: “If it were not that dogs were part of a nation among the nations, then I would order to that all of them be killed. So kill every one of them that is all black.”
Note: Jangan baca Hadith sekerat-sekerat. Zaman WWW ni semua ada kalau rajin. Sila baca link ini untuk pencerahan:
http://www.ustadzfarid.com/2014/03/hadits-tentang-membunuh-cicak-dan.html
Anjing Berwarna Hitam
Perintah membunuh anjing hitam disebutkan dalam riwayat berikut:
عَنْ مَعْمَرٍ، عَنْ قَتَادَةَ، قَالَ: «كُرِهَ صَيْدُ الْكَلْبِ الْأَسْوَدِ الْبَهِيمِ؛ لِأَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ أَمَرَ بِقَتْلِهِ»
Dari Ma’mar, dari Qatadah, dia berkata: “Dimakruhkan hewan hasil buruan anjing hitam, karena Nabi Shallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam memerintahkan untuk membunuhnya.” (HR. Abdurrazzaq dalam Al Mushannaf No. 8508)
Dalam riwayat Imam Muslim, dari Jabir bin Abdullah Radhiallahu ‘Anhu:
أَمَرَنَا رَسُولُ اللهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ بِقَتْلِ الْكِلَابِ، حَتَّى إِنَّ الْمَرْأَةَ تَقْدَمُ مِنَ الْبَادِيَةِ بِكَلْبِهَا فَنَقْتُلُهُ، ثُمَّ نَهَى النَّبِيُّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنْ قَتْلِهَا، وَقَالَ: «عَلَيْكُمْ بِالْأَسْوَدِ الْبَهِيمِ ذِي النُّقْطَتَيْنِ، فَإِنَّهُ شَيْطَانٌ»
Rasulullah Shallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam memerintahkan kami membunuh anjing. Lalu kami laksanakan perintah itu, sehingga seekor anjing milik seorang wanita, yang selalu mengawal tuannya dari dusun pun kami bunuh pula. Kemudian Rasulullah Shallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam melarang membunuh anjing seperti itu. Dan beliau bersabda,”Bunuhlah anjing yang seluruh bulunya berwarna hitam dengan dua titik putih di keningnya, kerana anjing itu adalah Syetan .” (HR. Muslim, 47/1572)
Hadits ini menunjukkan bahwa dahulu semua anjing diperintahkan untuk dibunuh, sebagaimana cerita dari Abdullah bin Mas’ud Radhiallahu ‘Anhu:
كَانَ رَسُولُ اللهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ يَأْمُرُ بِقَتْلِ الْكِلَابِ، فَنَنْبَعِثُ فِي الْمَدِينَةِ وَأَطْرَافِهَا فَلَا نَدَعُ كَلْبًا إِلَّا قَتَلْنَاهُ، حَتَّى إِنَّا لَنَقْتُلُ كَلْبَ الْمُرَيَّةِ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْبَادِيَةِ يَتْبَعُهَا
Dahulu Rasulullah memerintahkan untuk membunuh semua anjing, maka kami pun memburunya ke semua pelosok kota tidak satu pun anjing yang kami jumpai pasti kami membunuhnya, sampai-sampai anjing yang dimiliki seorang wanita pedalaman yang selalu mengikutinya juga kami bunuh. (HR. Muslim, 45/1570)
Namun akhirnya perintah membunuh anjing dibatasi pada anjing tertentu saja, sebagaimana kisah yang pertama (lihat hadits Jabir bin Abdullah). Oleh karena itu Imam Muslim membuat Bab:
بَابُ الْأَمْرِ بِقَتْلِ الْكِلَابِ، وَبَيَانِ نَسْخِهِ، وَبَيَانِ تَحْرِيمِ اقْتِنَائِهَا إِلَّا لِصَيْدٍ، أَوْ زَرْعٍ، أَوْ مَاشِيَةٍ وَنَحْوِ ذَلِكَ
Bab Tentang perintah membunuh anjing dan penjelasan tentang penghapusan perintah itu, dan penjelasan tentang haramnya memelihara anjing kecuali anjing berburu, penjaga ladang, atau penjaga ternak, dan semisalnya.
Maka, dengan keterangan hadits ini dan penjelasan Imam Muslim, bahwa perintah membunuh semua anjing adalah pernah ada, lalu perintah itu dibatasi hanya pada anjing hitam yang memiliki dua titik putih dikeningnya, itu pun memang benar adanya.
Wallahu A’lam
wow, banyaknya hadis. would like to tumpang sekaki la.
ali bin abi tholib narrated, prophet muhammad (saw) said, there will be hadiths coming after me, claiming that i have said things. so your must test those hadiths from the quran. if it is really according to the quran only then accept it, otherwise rejec it.
sori la helen & the rest, dah lari dari topik. cheers!
Tak kan cuma hadis bunuh anjing tak boleh ikut. Quran kata haram selain wahyu ertinya semua hadis haram. Lagi pun tiada hadis kata anjing najis apalagi najis berat. Hukum rekaan manusia saja.
Sebenarnya, Pedang ni bagi komen yang mengelirukan dan mengarut dengan tujuan untuk memberi satu gambaran kepada kaum bukan Islam yang seolah-olah orang Islam ni zalim, tak waras.
Kita dah tahu yang salah seorang commenter kat blog ni yang komen dengan menggunakan nama ahmad khamis ni sebenarnya menyamar Melayu.
Kini kita harus tanya soalan yang sama, adakah Pedang ni menyamar dia ni orang Islam ?
Re. Kini kita harus tanya soalan yang sama, adakah Pedang ni menyamar dia ni orang Islam ?
[deleted]
I thought you’re the one always lecturing us that one Muslim must not take it upon himself to kafirkan another Muslim? Hanya Tuhan yang maha mengetahui, bukankah begitu?
I’m not letting this comment through, LOL.
You can repost to counter his comments (pls refer us the relevant link if you do) minus your personal insinuations against Pedang and the state of his akidah. — Helen
ROTFL…In the mood “Nak Menyakitkan Hati” actually. I know you that you will delete it. Just a reminder to him that, please use his brain before commenting. It has happened too many times and his comment will appear only wrt Islam most of the time.
re: “his comment will appear only wrt Islam most of the time”
True.
So I was pleasantly surprised that he was the only one who commented on the “Trouble’ music video.
https://helenang.wordpress.com/2014/05/15/trouble-will-find-you-oh-oh/
Aiya!… it is his typical tactic and pattern of MO la. The music video has Christian motive and symbol. Yuna is a Muslim.
Sigh. Geleng kepala…
Tak ada keliru & karut. Ada fakta. Memang tak waras jika marah anjing kena panah tapi boleh pula setuju org Islam kena hudud rejam & potong tubuh. Lebih sayang haiwan dari manusia.
Siasat dulu apa sebenar nya terjadi. Baka anjing ini boleh membunuh juga seperti kejadian tidak berapa lama dulu.
Bila bab anak kucing di pijak-pijak sampai mati, di potong dua-dua tangan ( lagi kejam ) tidak pula helen bercerita…. tidak pula ‘cinakui’ komplen ! Haiya… manyak musuk oo !
Anjing garang tidak boleh lepas bebas. Berlesen. Mesti bertuan dan di kawal apabila di bawa bersiar-siar. Masaalah bising menyalak satu hal. Jika berkeliaran, siapa berhati binatang ?
Islam mematuhi menyayangi makhluk Allah SWT. Kes-kes seperti ini TIDAK boleh libatkan agama. Ini tindakan individu, kebetulan berpakaian biasa melayu ketika beribadah.
Jika di kira kezaliman, setiap individu biasa ada lembaga ini di dalam badan masing-masing ! Cuma akal yang tidak di guna pakai ! Ramai sekali berperangai binatang…. RBA itu binatang juga !
re: “Bila bab anak kucing di pijak-pijak sampai mati, di potong dua-dua tangan (lagi kejam) tidak pula helen bercerita”
WARNING: This photo will upset you. Don’t click unless you have the stomach for it.
URB, tak usah dilayan RBA ni.
I pity the fool. The dog could have hungry and asking for hand outs. Instead of doing a good deed he decided on the worst.
Sincerely hope there won’t be anymore heartbreaking news like this in our country or anywhere in the world for that matter.
You probably have heard about the Prophetic hadith which tells of a prostitute who out of much pity for a thirsty dog, went to a well to scoop up some water with her shoe for the dog to drink. And for her act of mercy Allah granted her entry into heaven.
It appears that the “religiously-dressed” guy in this case doesn’t possess a heart like that prostitute.
Sesiapa pun biarpun dia tok haji ka sami ka ataupun dia apa sekali pun yang salah tetap salah mcm kes perempuan jepun gila yg bunuh kucing pakai kasut tu.
Ini kes org yg pikiran dia tak waras yg patut di hantar ke hospital mental. Si pemanah kurang waras ni ada masalah mental yg sangat serius dan tunggu masa saja sebelum dia panah kucing atau kambing atau orang sekalipun….. elok dia didakwa atau ditempatkan di pusat pemulihan mental.
re: “perempuan jepun gila yg bunuh kucing pakai kasut tu”
Perempuan Cina sebenarnya.
Hi Helen, y u so timid handling this issue !!! If this case involves YB Hannah Yeo, WOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Did your YB Hannah make any comment on this case?
YB Temban mana berani… just look at the number of rats killed by them! (her pic dekat tepi blog Helen).
My doter bela 2 cute guinea pigs, very affected when she saw the picture.. Temban so cruel with teary eyes she sadly mumbled!
Did any of the DAP Yang Berhormats make any comment on this issue? Will they lean on the police to press charges?
Pls do let us here know if any of your favoured reps takes an interest, okay. We’re all ears.
He came all prepared with arrows, the dog must have been a constant threat to him, I am definite.
Dogs can be scary to many, not only Muslims. My neighbour’s huge dogs (usually chained) would go on ‘attack mode act’ should strangers pass by the house. They would rush out growling, eyes glaring showing-off their sharp teeth all ready to bite.
There were many occasions these dogs managed to free themselves from their chains, wondered out of the gates when my Jiran were not home. Siapa aje lalu mereka kejar!
The fear and screams let out by shocked passers-by (garbage collectors included always equipped themselves with long sticks) were REAL. – I used to rush out to calm the situation (faint hearted ade yg sampai nangis2). These dogs dengaq cakap as they are familiar with me. When they were out roaming habis anak2 kucing kawasan kami kena gigit sampai mati.
I watched this many times.. Pet lovers give some thoughts; [YouTube]
re: “He came all prepared with arrows, the dog must have been a constant threat to him, I am definite.”
How can you be so definite that the dog must have been a constant threat to him?
Same Indian garbage collectors servicing my area for the last 3yrs very pissed and angry, always grumbled when I came out to pacify these anti social ‘garang dogs’ (Subuh2 kita kan dah bangun, towkey still fast asleep).. ‘takut kami Kak, kalau terlepas pasti terkam dan gigit”.
I cannot imagine any sane person would carry a bow and arrow and simply shoot at any dog he sees. Ini pasti kes dendam!
Lots of people on the social media doubt his mental stability.
Kalau lain kali dia marah dan dendam, dia tembak anak jiran pula, bagaimana?
Don’t we have laws in Malaysia against people walking around the street with a bow and arrow in their hand, like you say?
“Dogs can be scary to many, not only Muslims. “
Dogs if well trained, properly taken care of and loved by their owners, they will not be scary but could instead become men’s best friends.
Like Pak Mie has said, dogs are probably the closest animals to humans besides cats; they ask nothing from humans, yet we treat them like dirt.
Dogs could even save their owners’ life when they’re in danger. In western countries, there are special centers that train puppies of golden retriever, German shepherd breeds into guide dogs for the purpose of assisting the visually impaired or disabled persons; you’ll be amazed what sort of things these dogs could do for their human owners.
So please stop having the misconception about the animal, blame the ignorant humans and stupid owners instead; most don’t deserve to own them anyway.
dear rina,
this is what i understand from your message. perbuatan mencuri bila telah dibukti tanpa ragu2, penaltinya ialah potong tangan. tapi ulamak2 kata bukan lagu tu tapi lagu ni.. kita kena cari dulu sebab kenapa dia mencuri sebelum menjatuhkan hukuman & bla bla bla (trust you know that as well).
so, in your case (neighbour’s huge dogs), binatang ni dipelihara bererti ada tuan. samalah juga dengan kes mencuri dimana pihak yang bertanggungjawab samada ketua kampong, ibubapa dan sebagainya wajib terima hukuman tapi bukan kena potong tangan la. i could have misunderstood your message anyway. wrt the ketayap wearing guy, dia dah jadi hakim.
nampak gaya undang2 syariah kena digubal merangkumi hubungan antara manusia dan makhluk2 lain termasuk binatang2 which is in accordance with the kalimah allah as follows:
‘And there is no creature on [or within] the earth or bird that flies with its wings except [that they are] communities like you. We have not neglected in the Register a thing. Then unto their Lord they will be gathered’. (surah the cattle ayat 38)
banyak jawatan kosong wor!
Yet another scare tactic employed by the opposition
http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2014/05/17/pas-holds-the-key-for-bns-future/
“This means that as long as PAS remains in Pakatan Rakyat, Pakatan supporters should vote for PAS. If Pakatan’s non-Muslim supporters fail to vote for PAS because of hudud even though PAS is in Pakatan, then BN wins the game.”
See, their tactic to sell Hudud to the unsuspecting non Muslims and later blame Umno/BN.
Sorry, I can’t let your comment cannot through. — Helen
Ada 2 orang perlu didakwa. Orang yang panah anjing tu sehingga menyebabkan kematian dan tuan punya anjing sebab biar anjing dia berkeliaran.
I believe any animals – dogs, cat, etc out of the owners’s property is fair game. Cats may not be violent but they may harbour unseen killer germs, should definitely be arrowed by this wira sejati.
Are you kidding me? You called him wira sejati for fun?
Even though the dog might had been a constant threat to that so called wira sejati of yours (like RINA said above), still, ‘niat tak menghalalkan cara’ which in this case, a big no no of his ‘cara yang zalim’. He had many other options.
So just spare us your twisted comment in future, would you?
I believe that if you come across a zombie or a sleepwalker on the five-foot way you should spear him dead before he wakes up and sucks your blood.
Something to cheer us up this afternoon:
Photos Of This Husky Raised As A Cat Are Exactly What You Need Right Now
http://thoughtcatalog.com/michael-koh/2014/05/photos-of-this-husky-raised-as-a-cat-are-exactly-what-you-need-right-now/
A Husky Raised By Cats, Actually Believes She’s A Cat… See For Yourself!
Read more at http://www.sunnyskyz.com/blog/260/A-Husky-Raised-By-Cats-Actually-Believes-She-s-A-Cat-See-For-Yourself-#wPJYZS2F1oCDq6jC.99
Panda Dogs Are The New Regular Dogs (PHOTOS)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/13/panda-dogs_n_5318238.html?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000063
Can you print this one.
re: “BTW did you notice that DAP has taken a leaf outta their evangelist playbook by selling sex in the Teluk Intan by-election?”
Yup, pretty sneaky of the DAP troopers to release the bikini photos into circulation. Very attention grabbing ruse, like Felixia Yeap’s publicity magnet.
re: “They are fielding Dyana, a fresh faced pretty freshie.”
Did you notice that the pro-oppo portals deliberately selected the most unfresh, unpretty photo of Gerakan’s Mah to use in their stories? The media machinery all self co-ordinating. Now watch The J-Star stab.
re: “BTW I thought DAP’s own laws do not allow someone who joined the party just in 2013 to contest in an election – much less as a MP….”
There’s an out clause if the central committee gives dispensation.
In any case, the DAP has been rubbishing its own party constitution in many other cases already, like “Call me Doctor, Ong Kian Ming, Yeo Bee Yin, Teo Nie Ching and now apparently Ramkarpal too.
How can they uphold the Federal Constitution when their own party constitution pun they cannot uphold?
Well. this is what happens when local authorities fail to curb stray animals.
It always turns ugly when a member of the public acts on his own to deal with problems especially when the solution involves violence.
Even in developed countries, the people they put to work capturing strays put down some of those animals. That person’s method is obviously barbaric and ineffective, also giving him notoriety, ridicule and possibly legal action. Guy’s possibly a fan of the Arrow tv show. Also maybe the recent news item of some dogs attacking three people including a policeman who later shot the dog to death might have compelled him to take such action.
Anyway, stray animals are a problem. I’m sure you guys know of what Pulau Ketam people did to deal with their stray dog problem.
You know what else is a problem? Vagrants, homeless, schizos wandering around. Who knows, maybe we already have serial killers in Malaysia killing those people who won’t be missed.
Re. You know what else is a problem? Vagrants, homeless, schizos wandering around.
I know many of them, some have become my friends. They have never asked anything from me. Even if I offer some help, they hardly accept it. They are people just like us, who have dignity and pride.
Have you ever tried to approach any of them or talk to them? Asked how are they? Listened to their stories?
If you haven’t, please stop labeling them as “a problem”, for you yourself don’t know what some of them have been through in life.
Methinks Anon’s comment ada maksud tersirat. You need to look beyond the tersurat.
There is growing number of homeless and vagrant now in KL. On daily/weekly basis there are NGOs and Organizations via their CSR that provide assistance and fresh meals to them. Ambank Group since the late 1990’s, I think, has a kitchen some where in Jalan Imbi to serve hot meals on daily basis to this group.
llki gila yg tak layak berkeluarga…. kalau ngan haiwan pon takder ati perot lagikla sesama manusia….. sama ada dia menyamar/dia muslim tp jaaaauh dr mukmin… pendapat saya… marah nih….
this is kerja gila. How many dogs sengaja kencing on my gates also I will never sampai hati to shoot any of them. Hose down dengan air adalah. But never to kill them, never!
What on earth is he doing with such lethal bow and arrows anyway?? Pemanah profesional ke? O_o
but damn, the paper (the star) also said that this same guy have 5 dogs in his fruit farm.
and yet he shot THIS dog. It’s like..what?? O_o
He’s a sadist who used the dog as target practice.
If he has 5 dogs, then he should have known that the sick, elderly and half blind dog did not pose a threat to anyone.
i agree it is way too much to shoot a dog in this situation =_= Even worse considering the dog is also somewhat incapacitated.
I also agree with some of the posters here that dog owners must also be responsible for their pets and not abandon them/ let them stray on the street when they’re no longer ‘wanted’. It’s not something as sensational as this case, but it’s a growing malady among pet owners that must also be addressed just as sternly.