Posted in Evangeliblis

MAIS menjunjung amanah mentadbir dan melindungi Islam, bukan?

Bukankah MAIS pernah menghantar surat pekeliling menegah kegiatan berpolitik di masjid? Gambarx2 evangelista Hannah dirakam di Surau Al-Huda

(140 abjad)

YB Hannah Yeoh Hannah's tudung 1435H
YB Hannah Yeoh fesyen tudung 1435H
hannahTudung2014
Lelaki Cina yang duduk bersebelahan Hannah Yeoh ialah Wong Chen, Ahli Parlimen Kelana Jaya

Author:

I have no Faceook or Twitter.

16 thoughts on “MAIS menjunjung amanah mentadbir dan melindungi Islam, bukan?

  1. semoga HY dpt hidayah mcm Felixia Rania Yeap yang dilahirkan semula hari ni. HY kena born again again lah, kah kah kah

  2. Wah nanti pasti Tembam kena beli banyak ekor Turkey menyambut hari thanksgiving dia?

    Kali ini dia pulak akan dapat kunjungan balas wakil2 dari surau Al Huda kgereja dia untuk sama2 ratah roast turkey dia.

    Hai Pak ketayap, tiap tahun tak letih asyik dia aje pi surau dan semejid kamu tak kan buat tak faham? Bila nak ziarah tempat dia pulak ni?

  3. Ms H. I see HY in all manner of Muslim dress. Please let me know when she is going to embrace the world class Islamic religion ?

  4. Why? Why? Why must the AJK surau or masjid invite all these dapsters to their surau or masjid? Jemputlah fakir miskin or anak yatim or even muallaf, bukankah lebih baik? Kenapa nak dijamu orang yang sememangnya lebih kaya dari kesemua AJK tu?

    Kalau nak dengar sangat ceramah, dengar lah yang berfaedah dan relevan. Panggilah ustaz yang bertauliah atau ahli akademik yang boleh meningkatkan lagi pengetahuan Islam pada bulan yang baik ni. Dengar ceramah politik yang diselitkan dengan agenda Kristian agaknya dapat ganjaran apa?

  5. Saya malas hendak marahkan HY dan Co. Mereka yang lebih berdosa dalam memberi ruang kepada golongan biaDAP Cinabeng ini bermaharajelela di surau ialah AJK Surau Al Huda ini!

    Kalau kita tidak jemput Evengalist kristian ke surau ini, saya yakin mereka tidak begitu biadap untuk masuk dan ‘ bertazkirah ‘ dalam surau.

    Kalau hendak menjatuhkan hukuman, hukumlah dahulu orang orang menjemputnya!😫

    1. The qariah who find the visit objectionable might want to complain to JAIS / MAIS so that the jawatankuasa surau can be suspended.

      Politik itu kotor, tempat ibadah itu suci.

      Adakah pemegang amanah telah menunaikan tanggungjawab apabila mereka menghalalkan kegiatan politik yang kotor dicampur-adukkan dengan urusan keagamaan yang suci, lebih-lebih lagi dalam bulan puasa yang mulia?

      Bukannya si evangelista pergi ke masjid atau surau untuk memanjatkan solat pun. Mereka bukan Islam. Sembahyang mereka dikerjakan di gereja.

      Maka tujuan mereka hadir di masjid dan surau tidak lain dan tidak bukan demi berpolitik semata-mata. Tuanku Sultan sudah beberapa kali bertitah bahawa baginda tidak memperkenankan masjid dan surau dalam negeri baginda untuk dipolitikkan.

      Perbuatan Hannah Yeoh sebenarnya mencemarkan masjid and sekaligus biadab kerana berani membelakangkan peringatan yang sudah disampaikan oleh baginda Sultan.

      1. Sila lapor kepada pihak berkuasa agar tindakan boleh diambil terhadap HY. Biar undang-undang tentukan sama ada HY telah melakukan kesalahan ataupun tidak. Adakah titah Sultan itu bersamaan dengan undang-undang iaitu tidak boleh dilanggar?

        1. re: “Sila lapor kepada pihak berkuasa agar tindakan boleh diambil terhadap HY.”

          Why are you being extremist and jumping the gun? Tindakan undang-undang usually carries a fine or/and jail sentence.

          I had remarked that Hannah Yeoh was being biadab. I did not say that she was seorang penjenayah yang melanggar undang-undang.

          Since MAIS has previously issued a directive, then the council’s instruction presumably still stands that no politicking in permitted in the mosque. But even if she were guilty of politicking, there’s no penalty in the Penal Code against engaging in politicking as far as I’m aware.

          Therefore, what I suggested is certainly more reasonable and logical than the extremes that you’re going.

          It is MAIS’s prohibition against the misuse of mosques as issued in their circular. Therefore the right authority that the qariah ought to lodge their complaints with would be MAIS and the practical solution to curbing this breach lies with the mosque committee, over which MAIS has authority.

  6. re: Tindakan undang-undang usually carries a fine or/and jail sentence.

    You are absolutely right. That is in the event HY is convicted of an offence. But we will never know until a report is made to the authorities, investigation is made, prosecution is framed and HY is given the chance to defend herself. Thousands of police reports are made daily but not all cases will proceed to the next level. No harm reporting HY to the authorities.

    re: I did not say that she was seorang penjenayah yang melanggar undang-undang.

    Again, it is not for anyone to say that someone has breach the law. Let the law takes its due process.

    re: I had remarked that Hannah Yeoh was being biadab.

    What is the standard of biadapness? Different people have different standard. It may be biadap to you but not to the mosque that invited HY. So the best way is to have a standardised regulation that is enforceable to everyone.

    If the regulations made by MAIS is indeed enforceable and has the binding effect of law, action can be taken against HY. Same case like the BSM bibles. MAIS is so convinced that an offence has been committed and insist to retain the bibles in complete disregard of the decision of the AG.

    1. re: “That is in the event HY is convicted of an offence. But we will never know until a report is made to the authorities, investigation is made, prosecution is framed”

      Are you one of the Puak Pelampau Kristian that Isma talks about? Your hardline approach demanding that HY be investigated by the police, charged by the prosecutor and [if guilty] convicted by the court is extremist.

      We all know that Pakatan politics is extreme but that doesn’t mean that we want to play your game.

      re: “Thousands of police reports are made daily but not all cases will proceed to the next level.”

      So why do you want the disgruntled Muslims to waste the police’s time?

      re: “No harm reporting HY to the authorities.”

      Of what benefit is it to report HY to the authorities? This is a MAIS jurisdiction issue, and as I’ve explained above, the mosque/surau committee is answerable to MAIS. The prohibition is in fact already in place and put there by MAIS. All that needs to be done is for MAIS to be alerted by the one of the qariah.

      re: “I did not say that she was seorang penjenayah yang melanggar undang-undang.” / “Again, it is not for anyone to say that someone has breach the law. Let the law takes its due process.”

      Are you daft or something? Let me provide you a parallel set of sentences.

      (1) ME: “I did not say that she was a burglar who broke into the house.”

      (2) YOU: “Again, it is not for anyone to say that someone [is a robber who has broken] the law. Let the law takes its due process.”

      I said she was “biadab”. I never alleged that she broke any law or committed any crime. So why are you insisting that the law be allowed its due process? You are chasing shadows.

      re: “What is the standard of biadapness? Different people have different standard. It may be biadap to you but not to the mosque that invited HY.”

      True. Similarly the qariah (say 100 people) may have a different standard from the surau committee (say 8 persons). If they wish to complain, it is their right. They have the locus standi.

      re: “So the best way is to have a standardised regulation that is enforceable to everyone.”

      Enforcing standardised regulation is under MAIS’s purview. Hence it is correct procedure for whatever disaffection to be brought before the state religious authority rather than to the police’s attention as you are insisting.

      re: “If the regulations made by MAIS is indeed enforceable and has the binding effect of law, action can be taken against HY. Same case like the BSM bibles. MAIS is so convinced that an offence has been committed and insist to retain the bibles in complete disregard of the decision of the AG.”

      Then obviously MAIS is the correct authority to sort this out with the other government agencies, same as with the confiscated Bibles. Therefore the topic of my posting is quite correct to be directed on MAIS. You are deliberately muddying the issue with irrelevant diversions.

  7. Helen,

    You started your posting with this:-

    Bukankah MAIS pernah menghantar surat pekeliling menegah kegiatan berpolitik di masjid? Gambarx2 evangelista Hannah dirakam di Surau Al-Huda.

    Question:
    What is the effect of the surat pekeliling? Is it enforceable? If yes, both HY and the committee of the mosque can be taken action. We know that this is not the 1st time HY visited the mosque. But the authorities have not done anything.

    That is why I suggest lodge a report or complain to the authorities (MAIS or police or whoever). Let the authorities investigate. Why label HY based on individual standard of ‘biadapness’ if the authorities themselves decide not to take action?

    That is why I say let the law takes its due process. I would avoid judging HY based on subjective moral standards. As long as no action is taken, HY will continue to visit mosque.

    1. re: “Is it enforceable? … But the authorities have not done anything.”

      Like I said, let MAIS sort it out with the relevant other government agencies just like JAIS is now sorting out whether the Bibles need to be returned. Those sitting on the board of MAIS are qualified people, including in the field of law. Why are you preempting them in their work?

      re: “That is why I suggest lodge a report or complain to the authorities (MAIS or police or whoever). Let the authorities investigate.”

      What’s your quarrel? You want the police involved. I said it’s a religious jurisdiction issue. We’re both not Muslims whereas some Muslim readers have indicated their unhappiness with HY’s gatecrashing. They will know what to do.

      re: “Why label HY based on individual standard of ‘biadapness’ if the authorities themselves decide not to take action?”

      The authorities will first have to be alerted to the event, don’t you think? This is plain common sense.

      re: “I would avoid judging HY based on subjective moral standards.”

      That is why I say that MAIS is the authority responsible. She will be judged by the standards of what is permissible and what is not allowed in a mosque. Why are you going around in circles?

      re: “As long as no action is taken, HY will continue to visit mosque.”

      At last! Something we can agree on. She will no longer be visiting the mosques if the Jawatankuasa Masjid do not extend her any invitation.

      1. Most likely no action will be taken and HY will continue to gatecrash mosques in the future. Not only HY but also other non-Muslims politicians. Just like the seizure of BSM bibles. The Selangor Enactment was made in 1988. Only recently we see the enactment is being invoked to confiscate the BSM bibles. Such a gap of 25 years.

        re: The authorities will first have to be alerted to the event, don’t you think? This is plain common sense.

        Who will alert the authorities? Will you Helen? Or someone else?

        1. re: “Only recently we see the enactment is being invoked to confiscate the BSM bibles.”

          Correct. The hornet’s nest has been stirred. And JAIS is being most adamant (defiant) over the Bibles.

          re: “Who will alert the authorities?”

          I’m not a Muslim. Logically, if any of the qariah feel upset by it, then they will do the necessary.

  8. I would like to relate the same incident that happen in our constituency about before last year PRU 13 during early month of the fasting month of Ramadan

    the YB of cause pakatan lah did approach the mosque headman for short spell with jemaah for joining breaking of fast and our headman and his AJK politely refuse his civic intention saying this strictly for Muslim yang berpuasa, tak lah YB tu bermasam muka pelawaan nya di tolak

    lain kes la jika AJK tersebut nak bermuka-muka nak dapat belaian ‘pampered’ atau pampasan drpd YB dia kot lain padang lain belalang sanggup defying law and order

Comments are closed.