Posted in Evangeliblis

Hannah Yeoh: “A mockery of our democratic institution”

Excerpts from article by Hannah Yeoh, originally published in Anwar Ibrahim’s blog.

“Anwar Ibrahim exhausted the constitutional means that were available to him,” wrote the YB Jerusubang. These words of Hannah Yeoh are unintendedly ironical.

Granted, they were written in a different con-text. However should we to apply them to the just concluded sodomy trial in the Federal Court, then Madame Speaker’s pronouncement is indeed apt – yesterday Anwar finally exhausted all the judicial means provided him by our constitution.


Hannah Yeoh Shameful Anwar

Shameful! Pathetic! Disgusting!

Okay, so now … what was Hannah’s rant about the “mockery of our democratic institution” all about?

Hannah wrote:

“To those who argue that the political crisis in Perak now is a taste of Pakatan’s own medicine (referring to the Sept 16 takeover plan), they have failed to see the key differences between the two. If you remember what happened when Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim claimed to have the numbers to form the new federal government, he wrote to PM Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi requesting him to convene an emergency sitting of Parliament. This was rejected by the PM. The next constitutional option is to press for the dissolution of Parliament to make way for fresh new elections. That was also not entertained. Anwar Ibrahim exhausted the constitutional means that were available to him.

It was also her fury that her fellow DAP evangelista warlords, James Ngeh Koo Ham and David Nga Kor Ming, had suddenly lost their behind-the-throne rule of the Perak executive.

DAP was the lynchpin in the Pakatan administration of Perak but they had been deftly outmanoeuvred for the BN to seize control.

Hannah Yeoh@anwaribrahim is one step closer to becoming our new PM

Hannah: Umno defector “did not alter the balance of power”, so it’s OK

Hannah – in her article published on 8 Feb 2009 in Anwar’s website (screenshot bottom of page) and elsewhere in the media – had expounded on how it can be argued “logically and intelligently” that the defection of Bota Adun Nasarudin Hashim from Umno to PKR was perfectly justified.

(Bota was the trigger for the domino effect that sent the Pakatan administration toppling.)

YB Jerusubang declared – logically and intelligently, wakakaka – that “he defected on his own accord and on his own will”.

Audaciously and most perversely demanding, “Let’s keep things in perspective here” [huh?!], Hannah proclaimed that Nasarudin’s “defection was that of an opposition lawmaker to a governing lawmaker. His defection did not alter the balance of power in the State Assembly”.

Hannah Yeoh dark side Fahmi

One UBAH for you, different UBAH for me

It’s like this, folks.

In the evangelista playbook, one Adun frogging from BN Perak to Pakatan is A-okay because – according to Hannah logic – Pakatan was the state government before he jumped and remained the state government after his jump. Hence there is no big-time UBAH.

However, Hannah and her evangelistas screamed blue murder when DAP’s Jelapang Adun, together with two other PKR assemblymen for Behrang and Changkat Jering, jumped from Pakatan Perak to BN.

Anwar welcoming Bota Umno rep into PKR
Anwar welcoming Bota Umno rep into PKR

Orwellian: Black is White and Hate is Love

Hee Yit Foong was threatened with death for her defection to Najib whereas Nasarudin Hashim was feted as hero for his defection to Anwar.

To the evangelistas , Hee’s move was clearly a different scenario to Nasarudin’s because – according to Hannah logic – Pakatan was the state government before the 1DAP+2PKR trio jumped.

But Pakatan lost the state government after their jump. Thus UBAH is correct when the direction is from Umno to PKR but wrong when it is from DAP to Independent.

Double standards? You bet!

Hannah Yeoh Anwar

If Anwar do (can what), if Najib do (cannot lah)

So there you go. The ‘highly ethical’ political morality of the evangelistas is perfectly illustrated by Hannah Yeoh for everyone to see.

Anwar’s attempt to lure Barisan MPs to defect on Sept 16 cannot be equated to Najib Razak embracing the defections of the three Pakatan Aduns in Perak, insisted Hannah. “How can anyone claim that Najib and Anwar are one and the same?”, she challenged.

The “mockery” of democracy alluded to in her article headline refers – how could Sultan Azlan Shah “possibly consent to the formation of a new BN state government”?

Hannah Yeoh  BN fitnah @anwaribrahim

‘Bak Kut Teh is not pork’ logic taken to the boil

For Hannah, the verbal assurance by Hee Yit Foong, Jamaluddin Mohd Radzi and Mohd Osman Mohd Jailu (the three Pakatan Aduns turned Independents) that “we will be friendly to BN” is not good enough.

The Sultan had called for a Perak ‘unity’ government to be formed by BN and the Independents, Hannah explained.

Nonetheless, the DAP evangelista loyar refused to accept the status of the three Independents Hee, Jamaluddin and Mohd Osman as kosher until and unless “they officially become members of a BN component party”.

“Thus, what the Sultan has called for is simply a name without substance,” wrote Hannah on why she deemed the Umno + Jelapang-Behrang-Changkat Jering newly formed majority in the Perak DUN as unacceptable.

Going by Hannah’s warped Bak Kut Teh logic though, a Pakatan plus BN defectors majority in Parliament would nonetheless have been fine if Anwar were to have successfully engineered the Sept 16 takeover.

BELOW: Hannah Yeoh vows to Bersihkan our country

HannahYeoh Bersih

Hukum halal dan haram ikut ulama evangelista

In the world of evangelista, there is a clear cut line between Side of Goodness and Light vs the Dark Side. DAP are the angels while Umno are syaitan.

Don’t forget, Hannah Yeoh had cried, “How can anyone claim that Najib and Anwar are one and the same?”

In a nutshell, BN was wicked and evil to have accepted the Perak Aduns who defected to Najib . On the other hand, Pakatan accepting any MPs who wished to defect is an act of patriotism because only Anwar taking over Putrajaya can save Malaysia.

Kalau Pakatan yang buat – dihalalkan asal Anwar dapat jadi PM. Kalau BN yang buat, umpamanya di Perak, ia haram.

Yup, that’s the evangelista ethics and integrity for you.


Off to Sungai Buloh he goes

DAP sah taiko Pakatan

Anwar talks like an evangelista

A Mockery of Our Democratic Institution


I have no Faceook or Twitter.

33 thoughts on “Hannah Yeoh: “A mockery of our democratic institution”

  1. And what about Mr Hannah asking us to sign a petition Obama to intervene in the Anwar case?

    Ram ‏@ramachandran_m

    Make the release of M’sian Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim from prison a top priority for US policy toward Malaysia

    Visit the link and it goes straight to the White House.

    “we petition the obama administration to:
    Make the release of Malaysian Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim from prison a top priority for US policy toward Malaysia

    Anwar Ibrahim, the Leader of the Opposition in Malaysia, a champion of democracy, a believer in Islamic justice, and a longtime friend of the United States, was convicted and jailed on trumped-up charges on February 10, 2015.

    The White House soon issued a statement expressing its “deep disappointment” with Anwar’s conviction. It said that the decision to prosecute Anwar and the conduct of his trial raised serious concerns about the rule of law and the fairness of the judicial system in Malaysia.

    But statements are not enough. The Administration must follow its words with action. Anwar is a political prisoner. The future of democracy in Malaysia is at stake. Securing Anwar’s release from prison must be a top priority in US policy towards Malaysia, to be advanced in every way possible.
    Published Date: Feb 10, 2015
    Issues: Civil Rights and Liberties, Foreign Policy, Human Rights”

    Is the White House is Super Supreme Court of Malaysia?
    Who IS really mocking our democratic institution?

    1. And see the comment on the twit.
      mycire ‏@Malacire 36m36 minutes ago

      @ramachandran_m @hannahyeoh Yes. We need also Tony Pua to urge the UK to do the same.

  2. ini aunty punya cakap mana bole pakai….?

    adake dia boleh cakap…. macamana nak tidur kalau salah seorang (AI) ada dalam jel?
    hahahaha….. takyah la nak bersandiwara!

    nak tidur, tidur ajelah….!

  3. Hannah Yeoh said: “After more than 15 years, BN uses the same old tactic to put @anwaribrahim behind bars. Shameful. Pathetic. Disgusting. @NajibRazak why??”

    Now, I say: ‘After more than 15 years, Anwar still got caught by the same old BN tactic to put him behind bars. Shameful, pathetic, disgusting for ‘An Anugerah Tuhan’. I DON’T HAVE to wonder WHY!!!

  4. Anything that doesnt go your way is a mockery to you. What bloody nonsense is this hag talking about. You lied and you mock the judiciary for the last 7 years and you say the result is a mockery.

    Fact is simple, your boss likes to have sex with men, (even carpet seller) and it is against the law of the country. If you dont like it, just migrate. You can have sex with a lamp post, donkey or anything you like. we dont care.

    1. JackD,

      Then why Saiful is not charged for abetting a crime, i.e. be involved in the sodomy act with Anwar?

      Anwar is charged for committing sodomy against Saiful. Section 377b of the Penal Code does not involve elements of rape or coercion. Despite Saiful’s testimony that he was forced, the court did not look into whether Saiful consented to the act of sodomy.

      Why kind of law we have in Msia? Why only the sodomiser is guilty of committing a crime whereas the ‘recipient’ of the sodomy act is free from guilt despite the charge against Anwar is not for raping Saiful by way of sodomy?

      1. So, in your mind, did Anwar sodomize Saiful or didn’t he?

        Anwar’s sodomy case is not unique. Even wives can make police report and get their husbands into court if their husbands sodomized them. Already happened. Saiful’s testimony and him making a police report is enough to make it involuntary on Saiful’s part.

        But hey, if you think you’re right, you should have went and told Anwar and his team of 15 lawyers before. It’s the way courts work everywhere. The judges and juries make decisions based on facts brought on by both the prosecution and the defense. Personally, I think Anwar crippled his own legal team.

      2. dear abc, this is what section 377A of the malaysian penal code says:

        ‘any person who has sexual connection with another person by the INTRODUCTION OF THE PENIS into the anus or mouth of the other person IS SAID TO COMMIT carnal intercourse against the order of nature’.

        and its explanation – ‘PENETRATION is sufficient to constitute the sexual connection necessary to the offence described in this section’.

        so, it’s the ‘introducer’ and not the other person.

        1. JackD, anon, kampong lad,

          Kindly read the articles below:



          Do not read s. 377b in isolation. It can be read together with s. 109. The Federal Court already decided that Anwar sodomised Saiful. Despite the ‘rape’ allegation by Saiful from the onset, the prosecutor decided to ignore it and charged Anwar for consensual anal sex under s.377b. If Anwar is guilty, the other participant of the sodomy act i.e. Saiful must also be similarly guilty for abetting Anwar.

          If Saiful is indeed a victim, the charge should be under s. 377c for rape by way of sodomy. Then only Saiful is a victim.

          1. Kindly read your own links.
            It’s answered there already.

            Maybe you should ask Anwar’s team of 15 lawyers why didn’t they question the laws used instead of delaying the trial for years and trying to get the prosecutor removed.

            Saiful’s still the victim regardless what law the prosecution used to convict Anwar with. Not only was Anwar punished lightly using the laws used, you also want the victim of Anwar’s crime, who reported him to get justice, to be punished as well.

            BTW, you think Anwar sodomized Saiful or not?

  5. ‘Hakim Bao’ mahu tunjuk hakim Melayu tiada kredibiliti – ISMA

    This is Malaysia, why the need to bring up the judge which is not related to this country unless they feel that their race is superior. Again, this is racist!

    1. ‘their race is superior.’

      Mano Maniam did the same too!

      “In the actual film world, although we have the professionals, we are far away from the professional film-making world.

      “We take too many shortcuts. That’s why our stadiums fall down, our roads are always potholed. We are masters in the art of our own deception.”
      – See more at:

    1. If Anwar was with UMNO either as a cabinet minister or even Prime Minister, I am sure that the DAP and opposition NGOs might even be celebrating his incarceration. PKR will not exist since it is the resutt of Anwar being expelled from UMNO.

      If the Selangor State government is under the BN right now, I am sure that the DAP and PKR would be strongly against KiDex and DASH and out there behind residents opposed to these highways.

      Bloody hypocrites!

  6. Yes let’s talk about mockery. Anwar is a narcissistic megalomaniac who actually believes that he is THE Anugerah Tuhan.

    He mocked the democratic process of this country. He was charged before GE13. He should have faced his accuser before GE13. That would have been the right thing to do if he were a gentleman statesman. But he delayed, adjourned, extended the case in the hope that his party would win GE13, so that he could sweep aside those charges.

    He had no qualms about wasting taxpayers money by standing as a candidate when he knew that his position was questionable.

    He made a mockery of the judicial process when he stretched that case over a period of 7 years, wasting taxpayers money, wasting court resources and in the process delaying justice for some other people.

    He made a mockery of the government when he was allowed to retain his passport over that time and he traveled round the globe belittling the government. He smeared the good name of the country everytime he stepped onto a podium outside this country.

    And worse, he betrayed his family. He was charged once and sent to prison. A normal person would show some remorse and learn from his mistakes.

    I have absolutely no respect for the man. I’m glad his trial is over and I hope we will never have to listen to him on the political front again.

    For people like HY who actually interact with him on a few levels to not know the kind of person he is, blows my mind. But if they know and still choose to defend and stand with him, then surely they are no better than him.

    1. Well, listen to what Her Royal Roundness had to say about adulterers (quote & vide clip below). But the catch is that she’s bashing BN politicians … muahahaha.

      0:51: “Politicians who value families, marriages, their spouse, will legislate with that in mind and govern like a caring government. We must never be like politicians from BN. Some of them, you know, have belittled the institution of marriage and even caused public humility [sic] to their spouse because of adultery.”

    2. Rejoinder to a fervent pastor and close associate of the gay libertarian Anwar:

      The Bible tells us that Satan has the ability to “appear as an angel of light.” Nowhere is this more evident than in the radical attempt to promote homosexuality in society today as something good. For the purpose of deceiving Mankind and destroying souls, Satan has thus given the homosexual lobby the following 10 commandments …

    1. Quite true what you say, Observer. The fat lady (TFL) was spouting nonsense.

      She wrote:

      “If you remember what happened when Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim claimed to have the numbers to form the new federal government, he wrote to PM Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi requesting him to convene an emergency sitting of Parliament.”

      Response (1) to TFL:

      Why in the world should Abdullah Badawi – whose party held 140 Parliament seats as compared to the 82 opposition seats at Anwar’s command – even give Mr Convicted Sodomy the time of day?

      There is no cause for the PM to entertain Anwar’s demand for an emergency sitting to be convened merely on the account of the opposition leader claiming that he has dozens of (potential) defectors.

      How laughable! There’s no procedure in Parliament supportable of Anwar’s poker bluff. Hannah is ridiculous.

      She further wrote:

      “This [emergency sitting] was rejected by the PM. The next constitutional option is to press for the dissolution of Parliament to make way for fresh new elections. That was also not entertained. Anwar Ibrahim exhausted the constitutional means that were available to him.”

      Response (2) to TFL:

      Once again, why in the name of almighty Zeus should the legitimately elected PM, whose party had 140 MPs, be compelled dissolve Parliament “to make way for fresh new elections” [WTF!] simply on Anwar’s say so that he had dozens of ‘frogs’ in the basket?

      The Sept 16 move was idiocy and not to mention unethical, and it only goes to show what kind of person is YB Jerusubang to twist and turn in defending the indefensible.

      Not only is Hannah midget brained, she’s also plain ridiculous.

      1. ‘midget brained’

        Sama macam Chong Eng!

        “She maintained that she was not criticising the Islamic practise of ‘tutup aurat’,

        She did. JAIS is Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor. The khutbah Jumaat was meant for Muslims. And for her to meraban macam orang gila pasal khutbah tu apasal?

        “YB (Chong) also explained that her statement must be looked at as a whole, not just parts of it,”

        The teaching of Islam boleh plak Chong Eng ambik setengah-setengah. Apasal tak faham the teaching as a whole?!

        “Sadly, Jais’s sermon is misinformed, irresponsible, disrespectful and smacks of male bias.

        “This ‘tutup aurat’ message does nothing to help female victims of sexual assault and abuse.

        “Instead, it shifts the blame and responsibility in preventing sexual crimes onto victims, instead of the perpetrators,” Chong had said in her statement.
        – See more at:

        Itu JAIS cakap sama Muslim. Suruh yang lelaki yang mendengar khutbah tu reflect dan jaga isi rumah wanita di rumah2 mereka. Lelaki memang jahat maa. Sebab itu la, Islam nasihat wanita supaya jaga keselamatan diri. Jaga maruah diri. Lu, Chong Eng, mau telanjang bulat satu Penang pun JAIS tak bising maa!

        Chong Eng, wa tau babi semua sapu maa, tapi lu jangan cakap ikut sedap mulut macam binatang tu!

        1. Hahahaha

          You mean Babe as in the animated hit movie starring a porcine character that was banned in Malaysia?

          1. Babe is not banned in Malaysia. The sequel too is not banned. It is being shown at certain times on Astro. When it was shown in the cinemas in the first run in 1996, the poster of the film was not allowed to be displayed and on Berita Harian only the name of the show was displayed with the names of the cast with the U sign.

  7. I suggest Hannah Yeoh to set up a tent and camp at Wan Azizah’s vigil and sleep there every night until Anwar is set free. It’s okay because she won’t be fired by her boss.

      1. Dear Aunty Helen,


        By the way, I do not see Hannah Yeoh’s name in TMI’s article of those been there last night. Even Wan Azizah and Nurul Izzah was not there.

        It is sad that the opposition are using their supporters to do the dirty works. But the big salaries are theirs. Maybe Hannah Yeoh does not want her Prada to be dirty :D

        1. re: “It is sad that the opposition are using their supporters to do the dirty works. But the big salaries are theirs.”

          Yup. Muka tebal. Look at the salary amount that they initially approved for themselves.

          The Dapster gangsters are ODIKAL GRED 1.


Comments are closed.