The Star digantung 1987, TMI bebas bermaharajalela

April 14, 2015 at 10:28 pm 5 comments

The Malaysian Insider mengambil kesempatan kenyataan yang dibuat Tun.

Berita tajuk utama hari ini di FMT:

Juga berita utama Malaysiakini pagi tadi:

Video wawancara dengan Dr Mahathir rakaman Din Turtle telah dimuatnaik oleh Firdaus Abdullah di YouTube

Boleh sesiapa tolong beri pencerahan bagaimana pihak berkuasa mampu menangani masalah seperti TMI raja hasut ini?

tutup TMI

Entry filed under: Kristian. Tags: , , , .

I respectfully beg to disagree with Tun today Jemuan-jemuan: If not Jho, then who?

5 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Hussin abdulRahman  |  April 14, 2015 at 10:58 pm

    Elok ditutup Malaysian Insider.

    Reply
  • 2. wak  |  April 15, 2015 at 10:16 am

    TMI to be forced sell. Get Daim or Syed Mokhtar to buy. Kalimullah can fix this deal.

    Reply
  • 3. bnm  |  April 15, 2015 at 1:03 pm

    re: Boleh sesiapa tolong beri pencerahan bagaimana pihak berkuasa mampu menangani masalah seperti TMI raja hasut ini?

    Why you don’t ask the same question for action to be taken on Utusan and Umno politicians that have made equally seditious statements?

    Reply
    • 4. Helen Ang  |  April 15, 2015 at 1:18 pm

      As far as I’m aware, TMI is the only publication implicated in police report lodged by Penyimpan Mohor Besar.

      The Majlis Raja-Raja making a police report (unless I’m mistaken) is quite unprecedented.

      The Rulers also pick and appoint the members of Majlis Fatwa. The fatwa council has similarly been misrepresented by TMI viz. the Karpal ‘RIP’ (faked) controversy.

      Insofar as I can recall, Utusan has not defamed Majlis Fatwa.

      Reply
      • 5. bnm  |  April 15, 2015 at 6:26 pm

        No doubt the TMI article is seditious vis-a-vis MRR.

        But Utusan and Umno politicians have in the past made seditious statements against the non-Malays and non-Islamic religions. Sedition Act not only protects the MRR per se. The law protects the non-Malays and non-Islamic religions as well.

        Please refer to section 3 of the Act with the heading ‘seditious tendency’, particularly para (e).

        Can you recall any Utusan articles and statements of Umno politicians that are seditious?

        Reply

Dijemput memberi komen anda

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


My blog, my like

Helen Ang

Recent Posts

Kalender

April 2015
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Pengunjung

  • 7,406,446 hits

Archives

Feeds


%d bloggers like this: