Posted in Umno

Najib gomen caves in to pressure

“The Home Ministry (Deputy Home Minister Wan Junaidi Jaafar) has said that Malaysia will push back the Rohingya that have arrived in the trawlers. We are waiting to see if Najib has the gumption to stand by his government’s decision,” I posted yesterday.

Only last week (May 14), Wan Junaidi was quoted by Reuters as saying, “I don’t see why we are under pressure. We are doing what we think we should do. We have to consider what our people want to see us doing. They don’t want to see immigrants come into our country”.


See, ‘Rohingya boat people – 60 percent poll respondents don’t want them


.
Evidently Najib is not standing by his administration’s decision and what his cabinet deputy minister said about giving consideration to “what our people want” (“They don’t want to see immigrants come into our country”).

Ergo, this current administration is not all that concerned with what “orang kita” want. Their decision – see latest Malaysiakini news, ‘Malaysia, Indonesia to allow thousands to land‘ – is aligned to what the churches and the liberal NGOs demand.

Rohingya migrants who arrived by boat, take a bath in a temporary shelter at the port of Julok village in Kuta Binje, Indonesia's Aceh Province, May 20, 2015. REUTERS/Beawiharta
Rohingya boat people in a temporary shelter in Aceh – May 20, 2015 REUTERS/Beawiharta

My suspicion was correct. The prime minister – as expected – is unable to stick with his own government’s tough talk (cakap aje berdegar-degar tapi dalam sekelip mata flip-flop dah … biasalah tu).

Caved in to pressure, predictably.

The Council of Churches has chided Putrajaya for being “inhumane” and lacking compassion while liberal NGOs (Eric Paulsen et al) slammed and shamed the country’s leadership as “heartless“, “cruel“, etc.

According to Reuters today, the Home Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said:

 

“Even though they are a migrant community that is trying to enter the country illegally, and breaking immigration laws, their well-being should not be ignored.”

Aaah, we get a glimpse of the thought processes in Putrajaya.


Council of Churches says govt “inhumane”, wants more “compassion” to be shown


Malaysians will do well to take encouragement from the example set by the churches of harshly rebuking the government. Their method seems to bear fruit.

If the churches can do this, so can other groups. A lesson learned.


 

Rohingya

Author:

I have no Faceook or Twitter.

81 thoughts on “Najib gomen caves in to pressure

  1. As Indonesia goes, so does Malaysia?

    The Philippines, being a mainly Catholic country, has already stated it’s position on the refugees issue.

    And when the UN Secretary-General weighed in, it became difficult for Malaysia to show “the finger” to it’s critics on this particular issue.

    More to the point, are Wisma Putra and the Home Ministry on different “wavelengths” on this same issue?

    Note that the Bangladeshis and Rohingyas are saying (as per reports) that they want to go to Malaysia. Not to any of the other Asean countries.

    That makes it tougher for Malaysia to play “hardball” and say “no entry”.

    Using the churches as a “whipping boy” is a pathetic attempt to divert attention from the fact that Malaysia had few realistic options to deal with this issue.

    Even if Tony Abbott is also willing to play the “hardball” card!

    1. re: “Note that the Bangladeshis and Rohingyas are saying (as per reports) that they want to go to Malaysia. Not to any of the other Asean countries.”

      Not a life-and-death crisis situation, meh?

      Now some reports, according to you, are apparently saying that the Rohingya want to pick-and-choose which SE Asian country is to take them in.

          1. Really? That’s the depth and extent of your “logic” (or what passes for it)?

            What’s my IC/MyKad got to do with the humanitarian crisis surrounding the Rohingyas?

            Why aren’t you complaining loudly and vociferously to Zahid, Anifah Aman dll that the government of Myanmar is treating fellow Muslims badly (you carrying the moniker “islam1st” and all)?

            Or is it because you can mouth off in blogs like these, but when push comes to shove, you retreat into the comfort zone of “the silent majority”?

            So, go and stand in front of the Myanmar Embassy in KL and scream your head off. Get a crowd of your like-minded compatriots to accompany you!

            Or, better yet, tell the Defence Minister to order the RMN to mount a blockade off the coast of Myanmar and stop all these boats carrying refugees in their tracks.

            How about that for an activist defence and foreign policy?

            1. re: “Or, better yet, tell the Defence Minister to order the RMN to mount a blockade off the coast of Myanmar and stop all these boats carrying refugees in their tracks.”

              Seriously, that is what our navy should do. Not Myanmar’s coast but our own. Patrol the maritime boundary strictly where the Rohingya are sailing and stop them from crossing our border.

              After all, we’ve got two Scorpenes at the cost of RM 3.4 billion.

              1. What about the kidnap gangs sailing in from the southern Philippines? Aren’t they more of a security risk than starving Rohingyas? Do they get a “free pass” to come and go as they please while the RMN deploys it’s assets to intercept broken-down and leaking fishing boats carrying refugees?

                But, in a sense, you have a point. Two Scorpene subs aren’t enough to monitor the country’s coasts.

                Will the Defence Ministry ask for more money to procure more subs and other naval assets?

                After all, the country’s number one security concern is to intercept and turn back hordes of refugees!

                  1. Are you comfortable with the “hordes of refugees” being left to die of starvation on the open seas? Or to force them back at gun point from the country’s shores?

                    There’s a fine line between legitimate security concerns and irrational fear verging on paranoia.

                    1. ‘Nope, nope, nope’: Tony Abbott says Australia will take no Rohingya refugees @ http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/may/21/nope-nope-nope-tony-abbott-says-australia-will-take-no-rohingya-refugees

                      Your scenario – “hordes of refugees” being left to die of starvation on the open seas – is not happening as Najib has ordered the Malaysian navy to carry out Search & Rescue.

                      My scenario – “hordes of refugees” swamping Malaysia – is the one that’s happening. Australia has refused to take in the Rohingya. Can you keep up abreast of which third countries are making offers?

                    2. Funny, isn’t it, that all these Muslim refugees want to get into the “crusader mat salleh countries” – Australia, the US, Canada, Western Europe, the UK etc?

                      What accounts for this phenomenon?

                      I don’t exactly see them trying to get into the OIC countries, do you?

                    3. ‘Really? That’s the depth and extent of your “logic” (or what passes for it)?’

                      I can be extreme like that. Kenapa too much for your liking ke?

                      ‘What’s my IC/MyKad got to do with the humanitarian crisis surrounding the Rohingyas?’

                      Tukar suka sama suka maa. Anyway Myanmar ada banyak peluang ekonomi baru maa. Alah, surely you’ll survive one lah! Anyway Malaysia lousy maa. Gomen so stupid. The law like shit. Many ISIS joining Arab wannabe Melayus around. Too many Malays maa. Ala, buat2 tak faham pula, why?!

                      ‘Why aren’t you complaining loudly and vociferously to Zahid, Anifah Aman dll that the government of Myanmar is treating fellow Muslims badly (you carrying the moniker “islam1st” and all)?’

                      You know what I do and what I don’t do meh?? You CIA? Mossad? M16?

                      ‘Or is it because you can mouth off in blogs like these, but when push comes to shove, you retreat into the comfort zone of “the silent majority”?’

                      Seriously? Mossad ah you?

                      ‘So, go and stand in front of the Myanmar Embassy in KL and scream your head off. Get a crowd of your like-minded compatriots to accompany you!’

                      Why should I. I can do better without having to scream and shout like Pakatan stooges. You selalu terjerit, terpekak, terlolong ke? Woof?! Woof?!

    2. Talks on going la Rithmatist sejak zaman pak kadukblagi. OIC special envoy on plights of Rohinyas is from Malaysia. Tak payah perasan lebih2 sangat.

      Lu pikiaq yes or no becos pressure fm those fellas? Must really be joking LA kamu ni.

      Anyway our area many Apek shops employ Myanmmas, some been here over 15yrs. Buddhists mainly, dah kumpul banyak wang sini tapi selama ini masih taknak pulang sana. Kata mereka susah sana, rasuah paw wang very rampant.

      Tapi petang tadi, seems all four of them going home by end of year. Mungkin feeling the heat here, Muslims being so accommodating and friendly with them whereas back home their Buddhist monks are attacking the Muslims?

      1. Oh, I see. The OIC is getting involved?

        This is the same OIC that has been clueless on how to resolve the Palestinian issue? The same OIC that can’t decide if Iran should be allowed to go “nuclear”? The same OIC that dithered about genocide committed against Bosnian Muslims? The same OIC that is silent about ISIS/IS, Boko Haram, AQAP etc?

        What other leaps of logic do you have in mind?

            1. Show me the references where the OIC has prevailed on the Myanmar government to stop discrimination against, and persecution of, the Rohingyas. Give us the links so that we can read the reports for ourselves.

              And while you are researching that, show where the OIC convinced the Chinese government to treat the Uighurs better. Or the Russian government vis-à-vis the Chechens.

              1. Haiyaa Rithmatist, you only know how to dig lubang cacing.. Where can see beyond those holes?

                Yr ancestors also once fled their homeland in droves, I am sure many died under the hands of the Brits, kongsi gelap and snakeheads. Don’t tell me you people just drop from the skies? Haiyaa even today many sneaking in, smuggled in and some even found hiding in special secret rooms. Haiyaaaaaa lu olang mayak kasi pening kepala satu dunia maaa. Same la, bukan Rohinya saja.

                Apahal le syiok sangat semua bangsa kalut sangat nak mai dok sini?

                  1. ‘This is the same OIC that has been clueless on how to resolve the Palestinian issue? The same OIC that can’t decide if Iran should be allowed to go “nuclear”? The same OIC that dithered about genocide committed against Bosnian Muslims? The same OIC that is silent about ISIS/IS, Boko Haram, AQAP etc?’

                    Wow. Seriously lu percaya semua tu meh? Lu banyak tengok Fox News ni!

                    1. Sure thing. Show me the references about any “concrete” things the OIC has done to resolve any or all of the issues I raised.

                      And, maybe, Fox News is just as much to be trusted as TV1, 2 and 3 or Utusan Malaysia!

                      Put up the specific rebuttals. Let’s see the breadth and depth of your logic and intellect.

                      Btw, I do hope that you watch the Fox News channel and read the WSJ. It must be refreshing to digest their views on matters Islamic!

                    2. ‘Btw, I do hope that you watch the Fox News channel and read the WSJ. It must be refreshing to digest their views on matters Islamic!’

                      So you referenced Fox & WSJ on matters Islamic? Patutlah!

    3. Malaysia do not have to grant them residence en-masse. Just as how survivors of stricken ships are eventually returned home, we can repatriate them back to Bangladesh after they are permitted to land on humanitarian grounds. If there is a risk they will disappear into the population, we can hold them in camps with monitoring by international bodies such as the UN and Red Cross.

      A turn back policy is only feasible if we can escort their disintegrating boats the vast distance across the Andaman and Bay of Bengal back to Bangladeshi waters.

      1. re: “their disintegrating boats”

        Where did you read about the condition of the boats? Pls share the link, thx.

          1. New, state-of-the-art ships can sink too – RMS Titanic.

            They chose to put their fate in the hands of human traffickers.

            1. Plenty of Malaysians put their lives in the hands of unscrupulous express bus companies with bad reputations. Do we deny them emergency medical services when an accident occurs?

              1. The bus passengers are already in Malaysia. Unless it can be proven otherwise, it must be assumed that they are law-abiding Malaysian citizens (or legal residents).

                The Rohingya and Bangladeshis are ILLEGAL immigrants taking our gomen hostage. The unfortunate bus passengers (e.g. heading up to Genting) did not hold the gomen hostage.

                GR Kumar commented @ 2015/05/21 at 5:58 am,

                “If however they force themselves on Malaysia by entering its waters after being warned to stay out which is a lawful thing to do, they bring upon themselves the full weight and force of the law including having their craft destroyed at sea.”

                They have intruded into our territorial sovereignty. I believe that after 9/11, if an alien craft intrudes into US airspace or waters, it would be immediately shot down.

                1. Let’s see if the authorities will emulate the US post 9/11.

                  But I would suggest that there is a world of difference between hijacking civilian aircraft and crashing them into the Twin Towers, thereby committing mass murder, and turning the guns on boats carrying refugees.

                  After the Cuban revolution that brought Fidel Castro to power, did the US Navy and Coastguard turn their guns on the boatloads of Cuban refugees trying to get to the US?

                  Or how about the “hordes” of Mexicans and other Latinos who are “flooding” the US? Are they being shot in cold blood by the US Border Patrol forces?

                  It is obvious that you haven’t given much thought to your “supporting” arguments!

                  1. You can’t tell time, ah? 911 happened in 2001. Cuba revolution, 1953.

                    The Mexicans and Latinos are crossing the Texas border on foot, I presume?

                    I said “craft”, in my comment. The Rohinghya vessels are “craft”.

                    The Rohingya who crossed overland through Thailand have not been intercepted.

                    1. ‘The Mexicans and Latinos are crossing the Texas border on foot, I presume?’

                      Texas was part of Mexico maa. Itu America sudah curi maa. So now they curi balik lor!

                      Sama macam migrants from Africa are flooding Europe lor. Dulu kena jajah, kekayaan dirompak maa. Sekarang they ‘curi’ balik lor the kekayaan…

                    2. “I believe that after 9/11, if an alien craft intrudes into US airspace or waters, it would be immediately shot down.Here is some news from 2010.”

                      “You can’t tell time, ah? 911 happened in 2001. Cuba revolution, 1953.”

                      Here is some recent news.

                      http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2010-10-11/news/fl-boca-raton-migrants-ashore-20101011_1_illegal-immigrants-coast-guard-boat

                      BOCA RATON — The U.S. Coast Guard brought more than 30 illegal immigrants ashore after their boat was intercepted off Boca Raton about 4 a.m. Monday, according to Coast Guard officials.

                      The boat was not in distress.

                      The US Coast Guard frequently intercepts migrant boats at sea. The passengers are brought to shore and deported if they are not bona-fide refugees or have no valid visa. No use of military force.

                      http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg5/cg531/AMIO/amio.asp

                    3. Thank you for the news – “The US Coast Guard frequently intercepts migrant boats at sea. The passengers are brought to shore and deported”

                      Malaysia’s marine police should do the same and intercept migrant boats at sea too. The passengers should be deported instead of being allowed to stay here for a whole year at the behest of the merciful Hannah Yeoh types.

                    4. “Malaysia’s marine police should do the same and intercept migrant boats at sea too. The passengers should be deported instead of being allowed to stay here for a whole year at the behest of the merciful Hannah Yeoh types.”

                      That is what should be done, and is being done. Instead of turning them to another neighbouring country while their food, water, fuel, and boat’s structure wear out.

                      The Australians move the intercepted passengers into orange capsule lifeboats and tow them back to Indonesia where they embarked from. However, the distance from Malaysia to Bangladesh is much further. It may be more cost effective to bring them ashore, and deport them through KLIA.

                    5. re: “That is what should be done, and is being done.” / “It may be more cost effective to bring them ashore, and deport them through KLIA.”

                      You were talking about the American coastguards who deport the Cubans that try to land by boat. Are the Americans keeping the Cubans for up to a year on USA soil? Are the Americans promising to help the Cubans resettle in a third country?

                  2. …..But I would suggest that there is a world of difference between hijacking civilian aircraft and crashing them into the Twin Towers, thereby committing mass murder, and turning the guns on boats carrying refugees….

                    Haiyaaa itu Bush and Blair weapon of mass destruction apa kurangnya? Mana? Show the world la, tarak nampak? Killing civilians? ITU kepala lu taraq nampak, cacing bole nampak?

                    1. American killing drones terbang satu dunia bunuh orang itu mana lia boley nampak punya owh.Ini Rithmatist mata talak center kut??

              2. “The bus passengers are already in Malaysia. Unless it can be proven otherwise, it must be assumed that they are law-abiding Malaysian citizens (or legal residents). The Rohingya and Bangladeshis are ILLEGAL immigrants taking our gomen hostage. The unfortunate bus passengers (e.g. heading up to Genting) did not hold the gomen hostage.”

                Rescue and emergency services technically do not operate on a citizenship basis. Otherwise, it sets a precedent where ambulance personnel, fire, or police can legally deny assistance to victims based on suspect visa status.

                “The Rohingya and Bangladeshis are ILLEGAL immigrants taking our gomen hostage.”

                A bit of a hyperbole. They are not storming Putrajaya and holding the Cabinet to hostage. The solution can be simple; bring them in as stricken vessel survivors, and arrange to have them repatriated. Especially the Bangladeshis on the boat, who are obviously trying to enter to work.

                We do this all the time. If you are in KLIA, sometimes you will see troupes of Bangladeshi illegals being escorted in handcuffs to the planes by customs and immigration officers.

                1. re: “Rescue and emergency services technically do not operate on a citizenship basis. Otherwise, it sets a precedent where ambulance personnel, fire, or police can legally deny assistance to victims based on suspect visa status.”

                  The Search & Rescue of the Rohingya at sea was personally ordered by Najib. If you AC-DC get into an accident driving that car with the faulty brakes, I don’t need the PM’s permission (or green light from the top brass in charge of S & R) to call an ambulance for you.

                  re: “The Rohingya and Bangladeshis are ILLEGAL immigrants taking our gomen hostage.” / “A bit of a hyperbole. They are not storming Putrajaya and holding the Cabinet to hostage.”

                  Yes they are. They’re sending the message that if we don’t let them in, their bodies might wash ashore.

                  It’s like as if AC-DC were to stalk a beautiful actress and if she refuses to open her door to you, you threaten to sit in front of her house and go on a hunger strike until you pass out.

                  re: “The solution can be simple; bring them in as stricken vessel survivors, and arrange to have them repatriated. Especially the Bangladeshis on the boat, who are obviously trying to enter to work.”

                  How to separate the Bangladeshis from the Rohingya? They belong to the same racial stock and do not carry identification papers.

                  re: “We do this all the time. If you are in KLIA, sometimes you will see troupes of Bangladeshi illegals being escorted in handcuffs to the planes by customs and immigration officers.”

                  Then you can propose to our maritime enforcement agencies to do the same with the Bangladeshis trying to illegally get in via sea route.

                2. “Yes they are. They’re sending the message that if we don’t let them in, their bodies might wash ashore.”

                  It is the hostage takers that threaten to make the corpses of their hostages wash ashore.

                  “It’s like as if AC-DC were to stalk a beautiful actress and if she refuses to open her door to you, you threaten to sit in front of her house and go on a hunger strike until you pass out.”

                  That is stalking. Hostage taking would be if Helen kidnaps a certain State Assembly speaker after following her movements day and night on social and news media, then threatens to harm her unless she resigns all posts and abandons her family, and the police cease pursuit.

                  “How to separate the Bangladeshis from the Rohingya? They belong to the same racial stock and do not carry identification papers.”

                  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohingya_language

                  The Bangladeshis speak Bengali. The Rohingyas speak another language. Burmese could also be used.

                  1. re: “It is the hostage takers that threaten to make the corpses of their hostages wash ashore.

                    There were no gunmen on the boat holding a revolver to the head of the Rohingya or Bangladesh. It was the two groups who were slaughtering each other with axes, knives and metal rods. http://www.bangkokpost.com/lite/topstories/566207/on-foundering-migrant-boat-it-was-jump-kill-or-be-killed

                    re: “Hostage taking would be if Helen kidnaps a certain State Assembly speaker after following her movements day and night on social and news media, then threatens to harm her unless she resigns all posts and abandons her family, and the police cease pursuit.”

                    – Helen has never kidnapped anybody.

                    – The movements of publicity-seeking politicians are displayed day and night on social and news media because they promote themselves or are promoted by the newspapers that support their political party.

                    – Helen has never threatened to harm any politikus to make that politikus to resign all posts. AC-DC ni boleh buat tuduhan sembrono. Jelas si AC-DC seorang pemfitnah tegar.

                    – Helen has never threatened to harm ‘her’ unless she … abandons her family”. Dakwaan AC-DC ini membuktikan dia seorang peminat DAP yang tak keruan. Really, without AC-DC’s willingness to Show & Tell, readers of this blog wouldn’t be able to imagine how deranged some of the HY Fan Club can be.

                    re: “How to separate the Bangladeshis from the Rohingya? They belong to the same racial stock and do not carry identification papers.” / http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohingya_language

                    Are you saying that we have enough law enforcement officers who are mostly Malay able to speak both Ruáingga as well as the Bengali dialect (in order to distinguish) and to process the thousands of illegal immigrants from the boats?

                    re: “The Bangladeshis speak Bengali. The Rohingyas speak another language. Burmese could also be used.”

                    Oh, and our immigration officers are supposed to speak Burmese too when the Rohingya themselves don’t. There have been news reports that quoted the Rakhine natives as complaining (some) Rohingya don’t speak Burmese.

                    1. “Are you saying that we have enough law enforcement officers who are mostly Malay able to speak both Ruáingga as well as the Bengali dialect (in order to distinguish) and to process the thousands of illegal immigrants from the boats?”

                      There is a profession called an ‘interpreter’.

                      “– Helen has never kidnapped anybody.”
                      “- Helen has never threatened to harm any politikus”
                      “– Helen has never threatened to harm ‘her’”

                      Helen has apparently not read the word ‘if’, causing her to go into a lengthy ramble accusing me of accusing her.

                      “Hostage taking would be if Helen kidnaps a certain State Assembly speaker after following her movements day and night”

                    2. re: “There is a profession called an ‘interpreter’.”

                      Oh, so you’re saying the Malaysian gomen needs to engage dozens of interpreters who speak Burmese, Ruáingga and the Bengali dialect to process the illegals at the emigrantion depo. Okay, gottit.

                      re: “Helen has apparently not read the word ‘if’, causing her to go into a lengthy ramble accusing me of accusing her.”

                      ‘If’ AC-DC was a just little bit more carnivorous than he is now, he would be bashing up his neighbour’s dog, and chopping and cooking it for his dinner.

                      Ain’t accusing you of anything okay. I said “if”.

            2. Pasai mereka tak comel and handsome itu pasai terpaksa naik boats.

              Ramai lain yg handsome2 comel like rostitutes openly sneaked in sejak zaman tok kaduk lagi, konon as tourists and students, siap ada bapa2 ayam tunggu kat KLIA lagi to welcome them.

              Berduyun2 macam jenis jantina bangsa dan agama…

              Siapa kata they prefer to choose western countries? Majority of Chinese population are in the ASEAN countries, Thailand and Malaysia tops the world list?

              Why Malaysia, a small country Melayu bidoh country tapi berduyun2 nak sangat mai dok sini? Why they choose Malaysia orh Rithmatist? Your ancestors included kan, or they dropped fm the skies too?

              1. ‘siap ada bapa2 ayam tunggu kat KLIA lagi to welcome them.’

                Sometime husbands. Shhhh….

                ‘Malaysia tops’

                Itu Rohingyas pun mahu masuk Malaysia saja…

  2. So after a week or two of watching the man bleeding to death on the roadside, wondering if he deserved his injuries or deserved our help, Malaysia acts.

    The online world is not the real world. Malaysia should be commended. Now time to make arrangements to deport them back to Myanmar efficiently and fast.

    1. re: “deport them back to Myanmar efficiently and fast”

      Don’t bank on it. Foreign Minister Anifah Aman has said we accept them “on condition that the international community resettles or repatriates them within a year“.

      Secondly, Myanmar has threatened to boycott the Asean summit meant to discuss this problem. If Yangon won’t even attend a meeting about the Rohingya, plus the Burmese government will not allowed its Asean neighbours to refer to the group as Rohingya, what makes you think they will want to take back these boat people?

      Thousands of Vietnamese boat people rioted in their Hong Kong camp May 20-21, 1995. They first made landfall in Malaysia in 1975. The problem dragged on for a quarter of a century. No “efficient”, no “fast” solution.

  3. Keling dari bangla, keling dari india, keling dari myanmar.
    If the buddhist wont accept this indians why should we?
    Easy way out.

  4. Kick Myanmar out of ASEAN. What has the country contributed to the association other than asking other members to shoulder their internal problems? If they don’t want to even discuss the problem they have created what’s the point of having them around?

    Please also send back all the Myanmar nationals working here. Send them home. Why help them? Beacuse Hannah the Banana, Eric Paulsen and the Council of Churches want us to? These people are after shitheads, so we should not listen to them at all.

    Or send them all to Penang instead, where the DAP evangelistas rule, and see what they can make of that.

    Angry la this old man!

    1. Let us pray for mercy so that foreigners including Rohingya’s can cook in Penang.
      http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/penang-bans-foreign-cooks-at-hawker-stalls

      “The Penang exco has banned foreigners from being employed as cooks at hawker stalls, in a move to preserve the state’s food heritage.

      Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng said the new ruling would be enforced on all roadside hawkers in the state.

      Failure to observe the new rule would result in the revoking of their licence, he said.”

  5. Malaysia must send myanmars & all the tyrants back to their home. At the same time the gomen must accommodate the rohingyas the victims of genocide & atrocities done by the myanmar’s gomen.

  6. Rohingyas must be laughing their ass of here and in Rakhine,not to mention those bangladeshies that will cross over and get on the love boat heading south,

    Traffickers income will increase ,their new sales pitch will be “”Now All Can Go,Malaysia Here We Come”‘

    Congratulations Najib for all the crap and lies.

  7. What a load of crap. Seolah-olah jika orang Rohingya ini pelarian mencari suaka politik akan lebih mudah diterima. Our government has never been interested in allowing refugees (be it economic or political) to settle in this country, unlike other countries. Even the Vietnam refugees were all sent back. Masalah pendatang tanpa izin jangan disamakan dengan isu ini. Siapa yang menggaji pendatang tanpa izin dan siapa yang menzalimi buruh asing? Buruh murah dan pekerja asing suka saja diperhambakan. Disuruh hantar balik orang bangla, indon, filipino, myanmar, dsbnya. Banyak cantik. Anak siapa nak buat kerja ini semua?

  8. Malaysia is a favourite destination of pendatang, political, economic or whatever reasons termasuk penjajah2, prostitutes, ‘students’, warga mas programmes etc.

    Berduyun2 risk their lives arriving by ships, boats, tongkangs and some on foot. Nothing new year after year!

    Agaknya pasai apa HH and Rithmatist? Tolong habaq sat?

    1. HH
      You would find this useful too.
      http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Feminism/everything.htm

      A Christian Wife is to Obey Her Husband in EVERY THING!

      by David J. Stewart

      “And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.” —John 8:45

      Some people just can’t stand to be told the truth. A woman wrote me this week, upset over my article A Woman’s Role In Marriage. She just couldn’t stand to hear the truth that a wife is to be subject unto her husband in EVERYTHING.”

      I got free will.

      1. That’s worse than Malaysian women becoming ISIS’ “sex slaves”? It is the Malaysian authorities who made that claim.

        Or the Boko Haram forcing “marriage” on their female captives (Google for the reports)?

        If you are talking about Christians, let’s even up things a little!

        1. Haiyaaa itu Cina doll apa kurang? Sejak zaman took kaduk naik tongkang, kapal, planes… Pasai syiok main sama depa you close your eyes?

          Sama aje fungsi mereka..

          1. Aisay Rina,

            You are so liberal.

            Not often I come across a lady who approves forced prostitution and gang-rapes.

            Wait, come to think of it, this is the first.

            You are indeed full of surprises!

              1. At least itu OW ada ganjaran maa. Dia buat apa agama suruh one. Itu ‘ayam’ apa dapat? Agama suruh meh? Duit kangkang pun kongsi sama bapa ayam wor? Itu ‘husbands’ hantar bini kerja, lepas tu balik lumah main judi internet, pastu ambik bini balik rumah. Hari2 itu saja maa. Sampai mati itu macam wor!

              2. Why, are your powers of expression in English limited?

                Score one for the national education system!

                Hahaha….

    1. HH and The Rithmatist
      You too have free will. Free will to criticise other religions and judging others. (Including helping god in the department of judging)

      Thanks to self righteous people like you (who love to help god in judging) encourages people like me to use the free will option not to be part of that faith. More will choose that free will path if self righteous people like you are in the church community.

      Betul tak RINA dan Ist?

      1. I know coherence is not your (and your bffs’) forte.

        But this one really takes the cake.

        Butthurt?

        You know what they say, there is nothing so agonizing to the fine skin of vanity as the application of a rough truth.

  9. “I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.”

    ― Mahatma Gandhi
    (Dedicated to HH and The Rithmatist)

      1. Renungan untuk HH. Buat akhirat.

        Matthew 7 New International Version (NIV)

        Judging Others
        7 “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. 2 For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.

        3 “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? 4 How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? 5 You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.

        6 “Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs. If you do, they may trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces.

        1. Mulan

          More comebacks?

          Know what, you gotta stop quoting bible verses.

          It reeks of duplicity to try win points referencing from a source ( the bible) you yourself rejected.

          1. Thanks Mulan for the guotes. HH bukan yang kat thread atas ada minta quotes maa? Tak dak meh?? What la you, orang sudah bagi, lagi tak tahu bersyukur.

            Insaf HH! Insaf HH!

Comments are closed.