Dr M, masyarakat Rohingya dan penjelma Cina

June 13, 2015 at 6:57 pm 11 comments

‘Non-Malays not expelled, so why are Rohingyas?’ asks Dr M in Malaysiakini yesterday.

KiniTV: ‘Mahathir: Myanmar should accept Rohingyas, as we did with non-Malays’ (12 June 2015)

http://www.kinitv.com/video/19652O8

Tun Mahathir said (see video):

“Malaysia had a lot of people not of Malay origin brought in by the British and when we became independent, they were not only accepted as citizens this country, they were not chased out.

“They were accepted as citizens this country and citizenship was extended to even the people who are not qualified to become citizens. We don’t expel people.”

To provide a little more info on what Tun said, the Indians were expelled by Burma’s General Ne Win after his military takeover of the country. A total of 320,000 Indians were forced to leave Burma between 1962 and 1964.

In 1942, the Japanese army occupied Burma while the British troops retreated. Some 650,000 Indians trekked out from Burma, by land and by sea. The Sydney Morning Herald reports that the Burmese Indians crossed the border to return to their “homeland” India (at that time Pakistan had not been created yet).

See digital scan of The Sydney Morning Herald 22 July 1942 news report, HERE.

The lesson imparted to us by the Indian expulsion from Burma is that an ethnic minority can have been staying in their ‘host’ country for several generations (as the Rohingya) but residence does not mean that they’re accepted by the majority, especially when they belong to a different race and religion.

Dr Mahathir also said (0:40):

“But somehow Myanmar does not believe in giving rights to people who have settled in their country for 800 years. The Rohingya were not there only recently. They were not brought in by the British. They were, their place was included in Burma for the purpose of administration of British Burma.”

The Tun’s claim above is questionable.

Chinese have settled in Malaya for over 600 years

(1) He says the Rohingya have settled in Rakhine for 800 years. By the same token, we can say that the Chinese have settled in Malaya for over 600 years. Both claims would be technically correct but limited in its scope of numbers.

There was a Chinese community in Malacca predating the arrival of Admiral Zheng He in 1409. In which case – going by Tun’s Rohingya logic – the Chinese too have been in Malaya more than 600 years. However those Chinese who have ancestors in this land dating back six centuries are only the Malacca Baba Nyonya.

The majority of the Chinese cannot stake this claim as they mostly came as coolies in the early 20th century. Likewise the Rohingya.

There are indeed Muslims of Indian origin who are long settled in Arakan. This fact is not disputed. But they are not representative of the Rohingya claim’s to “800 years” just as the Baba Nyonya are not representative of the Chinese  presence in Malaysia.

Cina hari ini yang keturunan penjelma, by and large, cannot stake claim to a Malayan pedigree of 600 years.

During the 12th and 13th centuries, Muslim migrants from Bengal had filtered into Arakan and this tallies with the truth of the “800 years” claim.

In the 1400s, there was another wave of emigration into Arakan from Bengal during the reign of Buddhist kings in Mrauk-U who favoured Muslim officials and allowed them to play a significant role in the royal court.

However both the two earlier migration waves are the minority whereas the majority migrated en masse during the British colonial era. (Note: Arakan is the old name for Rakhine)

(2) Tun claims that (a) “the Rohingya were not there only recently” and (b) “they were not brought in by the British”.

(a) is correct in the context of the ‘Baba Nyonya’ Rohingya.

(b) is partially correct and if we compare with the Chinese immigrants in Malaya, not all were directly brought in by the British either. But it’s undeniable the colonial project, the British imperialism and colonial economy opened the doors for the Chinese to enter Malaya.

Likewise, the British victories in the three Anglo-Burmese wars encouraged the Chittagong Bengalis to cross the amorphous border into Arakan.

The following is an extract from the Human Rights Watch report:

“This period [1824 to 1942] witnessed significant migration of laborers to Burma from neighboring South Asia [i.e. Indian sub-continent]. The British administered Burma as a province of India, thus migration to Burma was considered an internal movement. The Burmese government still considers, however, that the migration which took place during this period was illegal, and it is on this basis that they refuse citizenship to the majority of the Rohingya.”

Note: 1824 is the year the British started their first war against the Burmese while 1942 is the year the British withdrew from Burma after Japanese troops occupied the country.

Other sources http://www.exiledtonowhere.com:

“British invade Arakan during the 1st Anglo-Burma war. The following decades see a large migration of people from the Indian sub-continent into Arakan, mostly Muslims from the Chittagong region. Arakan becomes British territory in 1826.”

The historical records agree that the mass migration of the Rohingya into Arakan from East Bengai only began post-1824. This does not amount to “800 years”.

(3) Tun’s third statement is that “[Arakan] was included in Burma for the purpose of administration of British Burma.

Tun’s ambiguous statement begs clarification.

As we’re aware, the British included Burma into India as a province under the British Raj for the purpose of administration. At the time of the British conquest of Arakan, the area was ruled by the Burmese Buddhist kings.

Mrauk U, which was the capital of the Rakhine kingdom flourishing from the 15th to 18th century, is full of fort-like temples and stone pagodas.

Tun’s statement (3) seems to imply that Arakan was an independent Muslim state of the Rohingya that was included into Burma by the British. If so, he is providing a wrong impression.

Even today, the government of Burma is insistent that the Rohingya are Bengalis.

The constant cycles of exodus – tens up to hundreds of thousands of Rohingya fleeing/returning to the Bangladesh (equivalent to “Balik Tongsan”) in 1942, 1962-64, 1978 and 1991-92 is evidence of the community’s origin from Bengal in the not-too-distant past.

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Hah!. Tags: , .

Boat brides: Girls sailing to M’sia to get married Raja Petra and Sakmongkol on ‘terrorists’ and ‘evangelists’

11 Comments Add your own

  • 1. islam1st  |  June 13, 2015 at 8:39 pm

    ‘Some 650,000 Indians trekked out from Burma, by land and by sea.’

    The 2 juta and their keturunan should belajar bersyukur once in a while.

    Reply
    • 2. jdlfn  |  June 13, 2015 at 11:51 pm

      Pi$s off. Chiiiibai.

      Reply
      • 3. islam1st  |  June 14, 2015 at 3:13 am

        Your mum must be proud!

        Reply
      • 4. RINA  |  June 14, 2015 at 1:58 pm

        Abandoned citizenship of tanah ‘ibunda’ they bye bye

        Abandoned by British in British Malaya they have to bid their bye by

        Got FOC citizenship and live happily ever after they constantly utter Pi$s off. Chiiiibai.

        Reply
    • 5. JPJ code  |  June 15, 2015 at 5:27 pm

      Ah I get it. These are the Chinese pendatangs that Najib loves. Dont call Chinese pendatangs.
      And these are the Indians pendatangs like Mahathir father from Kerala. They come with humility but hope to steal everything from the malays.
      Lim Goh Tong was a chinese kuli with only 10 ringgit when he got on a tong kang. Now UMNO Presidents buy his Genting Sanyen after giving him the IPP license. Buy Ananda KRishnan IPP for 9 billion using tax payers guarantee.
      No wonders chinese are coming in droves. Indians coming by the boatloads from the Bay of Bengal.
      Yeoh Tiong Lay got his own railway some more. Now Nazri the nincompoop, want to bring in chinese dolls without visa..oh I love those slim chinese women..Its all about the money Nazri said rubbing his thumb and forefingers in Parliament on TV,
      We will sell the Malay land for money. Its all about the money for these UMNO minister. Not security not maruah.
      Now visa less Chinese dolls are coming yum yummy

      Reply
  • 6. tebing tinggi  |  June 13, 2015 at 9:53 pm

    In this supposed to be modern world , such thing could happened to the Rohingaya , isn’t the Malays are very tolerance and acceptance ?.

    Reply
    • 7. Setem  |  June 13, 2015 at 10:54 pm

      I don’t get your message. What Malays’ tolerance and acceptance got to do with the Rohingas plight?

      Reply
      • 8. Melayu Malaysia  |  June 14, 2015 at 12:03 am

        Playing stupid????

        Reply
  • 9. sunny  |  June 13, 2015 at 11:48 pm

    The British brought in the chinese coolies and indian mandors to work in Malaya. Becos the Malays were somehow boycotting. The British and Malay rulers or raja also need to makan lah and pay gaji to their istana subjects and istana workers.

    Likewise Banglas are brought as working in constructios is un cool, also Indonesia amah and kedai makan workers are brought in.

    Reply
  • 10. kampong lad  |  June 14, 2015 at 1:13 pm

    keturunan cina islam (esp from kwuntung) dah jadi melayu & yg bukan islam jadi melayu sekerat (makan ulam sambal belacan). Helen, banyak lagi ka kat melaka sekarang? di penang tinggal cebis2 saja.

    Reply
    • 11. Helen Ang  |  June 14, 2015 at 1:24 pm

      Methinks the Baba Nyonya are on the verge of extinction.

      Reply

Dijemput memberi komen anda

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


My blog, my like

Helen Ang

Recent Posts

RSS TKO — Tranungkite

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Ismaweb

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Kalender

Pengunjung

  • 7,567,680 hits

Archives

Feeds


%d bloggers like this: