DAP tried to bully and intimidate Pahang Mufti

October 3, 2015 at 5:30 am 37 comments

Here is Grandpapa Kit Siang leading the charge – see below. His pol-sec Dyana Samad also tweeted the article ‘When sermons become hate speeches‘ penned by a DAP Penang municipal councilor.

And not to be outdone, Hannah Yeoh’s aide Azira Aziz similarly jumps on the bandwagon – her tweet below.

dyana sofya sermons hate speeches

BELOW: Azira is on the left; on the right is her doppelganger Azrul Mohd Khalib

KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA - 2015/08/01: A protester was detained by Malaysian police during the

The apologetic Malay

The Pahang Mufti labeling DAP as anti-Islam is NOT hate speech. It is truth. The DAP is constantly undermining and interfering with Islam after all.

DAP now chooses to characterize Pahang Mufti Abdul Rahman Osman as someone who spews “hate” in his sermons.

The evangelical party is carrying out the tried-and-tested method of “offence being the best form of defence”. DAP is getting its Malay members like Dyana, Syerleena, Sheikh Omar Ali and Tengku Zulpuri Shah to conduct the offensive against the Pahang Mufti.

The DAP’s purported “constitutional expert” Aziz Bari went so far as to claim that the Jabatan Agama Islam Pahang (JAIP)’s allegations could be seen as seditious and libellous. And the DAP threatened to sue.

On the sidelines are the Azirara Malays who have some connection with or sympathy for the DAP.

The Azirara type is apologetic and will insist on being known as a Malaysian Firster.

This sort of ‘Malay’ is usually anti-hudud and willing even to knock fatwas — Exhibit A: Azrul Mohd Khalib, pictured below with Teresa Kok and DAP evangelista Segambut MP Lim Lip Eng

Azrul Mohd Khalib with DAP evangelista MPs Teresa Kok and Lim Lip Eng

Clearly for DAP, the best Malay is one who is made from the Azirara template. This is one who’s eager to do all the legwork – and even willing to get arrested – while leaving her political master to keep her “hands clean“. See Exhibit B: Azira Aziz

Hannah Yeoh worker Azira Aziz

J-Star blacking out negative news about DAP    

It took a full month following the Bersih 4.0 demo on Merdeka eve before MCA and Gerakan finally considered stepping forward two days ago to condemn the bad behaviour of the Yellow Shirts.

And even then, the MCA-Gerakan joint press conference was blacked out by The J-Star. In any case, this move by MCA move is too little, too late.

All this time MCA has tacitly closed one eye and this in itself allowing the DAP to grow into the monster that the evangelical party has become today.

Not only that, MCA further allowed its media to freely promote the DAP evangelistas. This same media however has subtly bred contempt in its readers for the government.

‘Time to unite, not bicker, says Najib’ is a headline in The J-Star today.

Looking at the J-Star readers’ feedback, only one percent were “Inspired” by Najib’s unity call and 3 percent were “Happy” – see below. But wait, there’s more.

Najib unite emoticons

Mecca emoticons

In a story last week headlined ‘717 dead in stampede outside Mecca’, of the The J-Star readers who responded – see above – 26 percent were “Happy” at the tragedy while 10 percent were “Amused”.

These callous reactions to the pilgrims death toll beg the question: How has the EvangeliSTAR been training the MCA media’s hateful audience?

http://www.thestar.com.my/News/Nation/2015/10/02/Najib-stop-bickering/

http://www.thestar.com.my/News/Nation/2015/09/24/Mecca-death-toll-increases/

What Chinese reads The J-Star?

Half of the J-Star readership is Chinese. So what kind of Chinese reads this popular and supposedly ‘moderate’ English-language newspaper?

Answer: It is the Malaysian Firster – “Oh, we’re so thrilled to be told 10 times in the span 24 hours via the Star Online tweets that Hannah is appointed Speaker” – type evangelista Chinese who reads The J-Star.

Cina totok from SRJK(C), on the other hand, mainly read Sin Chew, Nanyang Siang Pau, Kwong Wah Yit Poh and Zhongguo Bao (China Press).

Readership

2013 data

The big divide

It is solely in the English language that there is any racial overlap in the reader demography. Readership of The J-Star is half Chinese, quarter Malay and quarter Indian.

Otherwise the gulf between Malays and Chinese is very wide. Its distance can be illustrated by newspaper readership in the Malay and Chinese languages.

Only one percent of Utusan‘s readership is Chinese while a mere two percent of the Nanyang Siang Pau readership is Malay – see pie charts above.

The language gap demonstrated above means that Malay netizens, quite obviously,  are not interacting with Chinese netizens using Mandarin (since very few Malays speak Chinese) while the Chinese netizens are not interacting with the Malay netizens using bahasa Melayu either (since very few Chinese speak Malay.)

Whether Malay vs Chinese or vice versa, the interaction is primarily in the English language. It is this factor that allows Hannah to cultivate her personality cult.

 Hannah asyik mengidam dan makanan kegemaran tidak pernah lekan dari bibirnya

Evangelista chameleons and their toxin

In my posting yesterday, I recounted how the DAP’s Anthony Loke kenakan MCA’s Deputy Education Minister Chong Sin Woon.

It is the same brand of sneakiness whereby Hannah Yeoh kenakan Sin Chew columnist Lim Fang. He had criticized her tudung-wearing and Occupy Masjid antics.

To deflect his criticism, Hannah quickly went into her merengek-rengek dan berbelit-belit mode. She retaliated by making as if the Sinchew columnist was anti-Islam. She accused him of holding “extreme views”.

Madame Speaker’s Malay-Muslim fan base were misled into thinking that the Sinchew writer was so narrow-minded as to be intolerant of Chinese women showing a proper respect to Islam by adhering to the custom of covered head when inside the mosque.

Hannah Yeoh Ugly Pendatang

What a sneaky bastard, eh?

But anyway, that is beside the point. What’s important is the blowback against DAP from conservative Malays. Whether Umno goes along with this backlash or not, it will happen regardless.

In the case of the Pahang Mufti calling DAP anti-Islam, it was PAS who first stood up for the Mufti. The Pahang Menteri Besar, an Umno man, quickly followed suit.

So PAS Malays and Umno Malays dah mula rapatkan saf to stand together behind the Pahang Mufti. This is a development brought about by the DAP. Remember this!

Plus if the confrontational Chinese are perceived as anti-Islam and enemies of the Muslim faith, the community has the DAP evangelistas to thank. Don’t forget, yah!

There’s nothing that MCA can do to help the Chinese now.

Entry filed under: DAP MENGKHIANATI KAUM CINA, Evangeliblis. Tags: .

DAP and MCA fight over Chinese schools Big Mama Muniandy

37 Comments Add your own

  • 1. tebing tinggi  |  October 3, 2015 at 7:30 am

    As I said earlier ,” cacing sudah naik kemata” , should they blamed the Muslim if they rebuke ?.

    Peneng don’t allowed outside speaker during praying time or any ceramah .

    Reply
    • 2. Soya bean army  |  October 3, 2015 at 9:19 pm

      Read surah 17 ayat 110 before opening your stupid mouth. Baca dan faham.Get it??

      Reply
  • 3. Hazman Hassan  |  October 3, 2015 at 9:50 am

    Ugut nak saman tapi takut bila Mufti tegas. Ingat : kalau Mufti Pahang jadi mufti pertama dipenjara sebab pertahan Islam akibat saman DAP, ingat orang Melayu akar-umbi nak tengok saja??? Helen Ang, please continue your exposure. We need you more than ever to be the whistle-blower!!

    Reply
  • 4. shamshul anuar  |  October 3, 2015 at 10:17 am

    Helen,

    The Mufti just said the truth. Before the said Mufti said that, you have already warn Malaysians about DAP.

    You are of course ridiculed. But Mufti is on different platform. He represents the office of Islam in Pahang. His word carries weight among muslims.

    Initially, DAP played gangster against the Mufti. Only later Kit siang realised that blasting Mufti as as blasting the Islam. I salute the mufti for being firm.

    The mufti chided the DAP no 1 guy in Pahang. The mufti did the right thing.

    Reply
    • 5. shamshul anuar  |  October 3, 2015 at 10:18 am

      Helen,

      Do you notice that nowadays PAS softens its approach against UMNO?

      Reply
    • 6. Soya bean army  |  October 3, 2015 at 9:24 pm

      So the Mufti is saying that the UMNO guys full of corruption, mismanagement , thieves and liars are the best of Muslims?? BTW blasting the mufti is NOT blasting Islam. Islam belongs to Allah and the mufti is NOT ALLAH.
      The mufti was entirely wrong in his statement and may Allah’s wrath fall on him for saying that, both in this world and in the hereafter.

      Reply
      • 7. wawe  |  October 5, 2015 at 12:03 am

        Stupid soya bean army. oh, oh, either that or you are manipulating facts…again? hmmm, typical.
        When ae you going to repent?

        Reply
  • 8. Orangkampung  |  October 3, 2015 at 11:37 am

    Lepas ni dia nak tekan mufti Perak pula: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/bahasa/article/dap-mahu-mufti-perak-nasihat-timbalan-menteri-mahu-lempang-cina

    Tapi kan kenapa macam ada kurang saja gambar di artikel tu?

    Aaahhh, silap saya. Semua di gambar itu anak bangsa Malaysia.

    Reply
    • 9. Helen Ang  |  October 3, 2015 at 11:56 am

      Betul tu. Tak nampak pun orang Melayu DAP yang cakap perihal isu Islam nih. Bangsa Malaysia semua.

      Reply
      • 10. islam1st  |  October 3, 2015 at 12:46 pm

        Muslim NGOs tengah dok perhati anak2 bangsa Malaysia ni, sanggup politikkan Islam untuk cari makan!

        Reply
    • 11. Roslee  |  October 29, 2015 at 5:26 pm

      Soya bean you are either DAP puppet or bulldog.

      Reply
      • 12. Roslee  |  February 5, 2016 at 8:52 pm

        I’m anti DAP and PAP.

        Reply
    • 13. Roslee  |  February 5, 2016 at 8:50 pm

      Barua2 dan pengkhianat2 melayu dan islam dalam DAP.

      Reply
  • 14. islam1st  |  October 3, 2015 at 12:44 pm

    ‘Cina totok from SRJK(C), on the other hand, mainly read Sin Chew, Nanyang Siang Pau, Kwong Wah Yit Poh and Zhongguo Bao (China Press).’

    Sorry Helen. I beg to differ. The vernacular media, partly with their ABU, partly with their sokong Cina sokong DAP mantra, are part of the problem. No two way about it.

    Reply
  • 15. islam1st  |  October 3, 2015 at 1:00 pm

    ‘Koon lulus pengajian dengan diploma kejuruteraan sivil daripada Kolej Teknikal (kini Universiti Teknologi Malaysia) pada 1957 di bawah biasiswa Jabatan Kerja Raya (JKR). – See more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/bahasa/article/jutawan-tak-tinggalkan-harta-buat-anak-guna-kekayaan-bantu-si-miskin#sthash.v8FZ2rwT.dpuf

    Helen, is that the same guy (tengok muka) yang cadangkan supaya ‘moderates’ dalam PAS keluar dan buat pakatan baru sebab Hudud??

    Bijak, and thousands of gomen land to his name. Wonder pasaipa tak bagi kat Sabah? Bukan Pakatan kut, or maybe Selangor? Hmmm…

    Reply
  • 16. Ibu Zain  |  October 3, 2015 at 3:51 pm

    Saya sertakan penulisan saya berkenaan isu di PP.

    Larangan guna pembesar suara di masjid kecuali Azan akan diwarta di Pulau Pinang

    Secara statistiknya hanya 10 aduan diterima dalam jangkamasa 41 bulan (Januari 2012 hingga Mei 2015).

    Hanya 0.24 aduan untuk setiap sebulan (1 aduan dalam jangkamasa 5 bulan).

    Penduduk PP seramai 1,647,716 bagi tahun 2013 (Jab Perangkaan Malaysia).

    Bermakna hanya 0.0006% sahaja yg mengemukakan aduan.

    Jabatan Hal Ehwal Agama Islam Pulau Pinang (JHEAIPP) tidak mampu mengendalikan 10 aduan secara terperinci dan menyelesaikan aduan2 tersebut secara “one-on-one” sehingga memaksa diadakan “blanket order” untuk keseluruhan negeri?

    Kita MENENTANG sekeras-kerasnya larangan ini dari diwartakan.

    Jangan kita lupa; titah Paduka Seri Sultan Nazrin Muizzuddin Shah, “Beta pernah menzahirkan peringatan bahawa pencerobohan besar bermula dari perbuatan kecil. Ia mungkin bermula dari sebuah surau, atau sebuah madrasah, atau sebuah masjid atau sebuah mimbar. Ia bermula dari satu ungkapan, satu ucapan, satu khutbah, satu tazkirah atau satu doa; ia bermula dari pencerobohan kecil dan jika dalam menghadapi pencerobohan kecil, umat Islam masih belum insaf, masih berdegil dan masih sombong mempertahankan ego, masih memilih untuk bertelagah, maka umat Islam sebenarnya telah memberikan petanda yang salah; petanda seolah-olah menggalakkan pencerobohan lebih besar boleh dilakukan ke atas umat Islam dan terhadap institusi Islam”.

    Reply
    • 17. Soya bean army  |  October 3, 2015 at 9:26 pm

      kalau awak tentang itu maka awak juga tentang perintah Allah. baca surah 17 ayat 110.

      Reply
      • 18. Helen Ang  |  October 3, 2015 at 9:45 pm

        Sure or not you’re Soya Bean Army and not Red Bean Army?

        Reply
        • 19. Soya bean army  |  October 3, 2015 at 11:01 pm

          have you read the verse in the quran? it’s self explanatory but then again everything has to explained to those who don’t read the quran and then shoot their mouth off. And then they claim to ‘Pertahankan islam” , I wonder what form of islam they are out to pertahankan?? When they abandon the Quran, they abandon Allah and Islam.

          Reply
          • 20. wawe  |  October 5, 2015 at 12:13 am

            Stupid soya bean army. oh, oh, either that or you are manipulating facts…again? hmmm, typical.
            When are you going to repent?
            The way you accuse others of ‘stupid mouth’, I doubt you also read the surah. Rather you might read the surah but misinterpret it to your advantage, You chameleoning is glaring.

            Reply
        • 21. Muhammad Muhammad  |  October 4, 2015 at 2:01 am

          Quran 17:110

          ‘And do not raise your voice high in your Prayer nor make it very low but adopt the middle way’

          … only talks about prayer and not Quran recitals and sermons.

          It tells us not to speak too softly when praying to Allah and not to scream and shout either.

          But it doesn’t say ‘don’t use a loudhailer’.

          The person leading the prayers doesn’t need to scream and shout. He has a microphone. His job is to make sure everyone can hear it. That is the ‘moderate way’. It is impossible to keep the volume that low nowadays … mosques are now very big and the number of people praying has increased.

          But having said that, since non-Muslims are so into lowering volumes for Muslim prayers, when will the Hindus, Christians and Chinese Folk religions do the same.

          Come on. I can hear the bugle from the Hindu temple from my house at 6pm everyday. But do I have a problem? No.

          Then what about the same people who burn incense and paper during Hungry Ghost month and make loud noises during Getai well into late at night?

          Do we have a problem?

          Do you seem Malays or Muslims complaining?

          It’s about give and take. The moment someone starts to take more than he gives, others would start to do the same. And when that happens, social cohesion would disintegrate.

          Reply
          • 22. Soya bean army  |  October 4, 2015 at 10:50 am

            The Quran does not say to use loudhailer to blast ceramah to the whole town . It does not say that we can use it to blast quran recital at 4 or 5 am. The prophet SAW once admonished man for reciting the quran out loud in the mosque because it would disturb others.
            I’m sure you are familiar with all this and yet you seek to look for excuses to justify your unIslamic behaviour.

            Reply
            • 23. Helen Ang  |  October 4, 2015 at 11:33 am

              Are you a Christian, Mr/Ms ‘SBA’?

              Reply
              • 24. AE  |  October 4, 2015 at 12:11 pm

                Sure he is. Muslim usually wont refer to the quran by surah number. He might have google it for the sake of this argument. RBA trying its very best to impersonate a muslim. Like we are blind!

                Reply
            • 25. islam1st  |  October 5, 2015 at 1:42 am

              ‘justify your unIslamic behaviour’

              Helen, why would a Cina konek tak potong would know better about Islam than the average practising Muslims?

              Reply
  • 27. Ibu Zain  |  October 3, 2015 at 3:54 pm

    Satu lagi artikel yg saya tulis berkenaan isu yg sama.

    Fitnah itu adalah bila tidak ada isu dalam mengamalkan cara hidup kemasyarakatan tetapi tiba2 diangkat menjadi isu larangan yg ingin difatwakan. Rungkaian dibawah:

    Larangan guna pembesar suara di masjid kecuali Azan akan diwarta di Pulau Pinang 2015 – SEJARAH ASAKAN YANG BERULANG

    ASAKAN TERHADAP UMAT ISLAM di PULAU PINANG 2011: Larangan guna pembesar suara untuk bacaan Al-Quran sebelum subuh dikeluarkan. Dilaporkan larangan ini TIDAK AKAN DIWARTAKAN.
    (http://www.bernama.com/bernama/state_news/bm/news.php…)

    ASAKAN TERHADAP UMAT ISLAM PULAU PINANG 2015: Larangan menggunakan pembesar suara di luar masjid dan surau kecuali untuk azan dan iqamah di Pulau Pinang AKAN DIWARTAKAN.
    (http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v8/bm/ge/newsgeneral.php…)

    Hanya dalam jangkamasa empat tahun, status larangan dari satu panduan yg TIDAK AKAN DIWARTAKAN bertukar menjadi larangan yang AKAN DIWARTAKAN. Apa jaminan yg ada dalam jangkamasa empat tahun yang akan datang azan dan iqamah akan terus bergema di negeri Pulau Pinang? PEWARTAAN larangan ini hanya kerana *0.0006% aduan diterima dan tidak dapat dikendalikan oleh Jabatan Hal Ehwal Agama Islam Pulau Pinang (JHEAIPP)!

    Bermula sekali lagi penjajahan. Kita MENENTANG sekeras-kerasnya larangan ini dari diwartakan.

    *10 aduan dalam tempoh 41bulan (Januari 2012 hingga Mei 2015)
    *Jumlah penduduk PP seramai 1,647,716 bagi tahun 2013

    Reply
  • 28. Ibu Zain  |  October 4, 2015 at 10:29 am

    Catatan terbaru saya tentang isu di PP.

    Larangan guna pembesar suara di masjid kecuali Azan akan diwarta di Pulau Pinang: KEGAGALAN Jabatan Hal Ehwal Agama Islam Pulau Pinang (JHEAIPP)

    KEGAGALAN JHEAIPP untuk mengendalikan serta menyelesaikan 10 aduan dalam jangkamasa 41 bulan (1 aduan bagi setiap 5 bulan) akan mendatangkan mudarat yang paling besar kepada kemaslahatan umat Islam. Sekiranya larangan ini DIWARTAKAN di Pulau Pinang ianya akan menjadi “precedent-set” dan “point-of-reference”.

    JHEAIPP perlu memberikan penerangan secara terperinci keatas setiap satu dari 10 aduan yang telah diterima dan telah gagal ditangani. Apakah komplikasi yang terlibat sehingga jabatan tidak mempunyai kemampuan untuk menyelesaikan hanya 1 kes bagi setiap 5 bulan. Sekiranya benar jabatan ini telah gagal; sehingga memaksa PEWARTAAN LARANGAN maka siapakah yang perlu dipecat – Pengarah JHEAIPP, EXCO Hal Ehwal Agama atau Mufti Negeri PP?

    Namun persoalan yg lebih besar, sekiranya semua 10 aduan tersebut telah pun berjaya diselesaikan maka apakah keperluan kepada PEWARTAAN LARANGAN ini? Orang Islam berhak mendapatkan jawapan.

    Selagi tiada pencerahan, kita MENENTANG sekeras-kerasnya larangan ini dari diwartakan.

    Reply
    • 29. Helen Ang  |  October 4, 2015 at 10:44 am

      Dulu si ‘khalifah’ celup boleh begitu ghairah jaja imej kononnya mendekati Islam. Sekali dengan ungkapan “amar makruf nahi mungkar” yang tak lekang dari bibir beserta makan dalam talam di masjid.

      Sekarang ini gara-gara cukup kukuh P. Pinang dalam cengkaman mereka maka sudah tidak liat untuk tunjuk belang dah.

      Nanti sekor lagi yang di Jerusubang tu pun buka pekung juga.

      Reply
  • 30. Ibu Zain  |  October 4, 2015 at 10:38 am

    Saudari Helen, terima kasih diatas kesempatan yg diberikan dalam berkongsi ruang perbicaraan. Budi ini saya simpan. Jika ianya tidak terbalas, ianya akan sentiasa ada dalam kenangan.

    Reply
  • 31. Bel Acak  |  October 5, 2015 at 9:59 am

    Saya bersetuju, menghadkan penggunaan speaker luar untuk Azan. Ini adalah kerana Azan adalah pengumuman tentang masuknya waktu Solat. Dari segi hukum pula, Azan bukanlah wajib.

    Penggunaan speaker luar sewaktu ceramah adalah tidak wajar oleh kerana ianya mengganggu perjalanan harian penduduk sekitarnya (umat Islam dan bukan Islam). Kebiasaannya ceramah yang dimaksudkan adalah ceramah Maghrib (di antara waktu Maghrib dan Isya’). Waktu ini berkemungkinan penduduk sekitar digunakan untuk melayan tetamu, berbual, dan belajar.

    Namun, tindakan mengwartakan larangan tersebut adakan tidak wajar.

    Reply
    • 32. pure  |  October 5, 2015 at 1:14 pm

      Bagi azan, walaupun tidak wajib, saya rasa kita masih boleh berbincang dengan orang bukan Islam jika ramai yang bukan Islam tinggal di sekeliling kawasan masjid/surau. Namun sekiranya ia adalah kawasan majoriti orang Islam, eloklah dibuat. Tapi bukan Iqamah. Iqamah boleh guna speaker dalam sahaja walaupun kawasan majoriti Islam.

      Selain dari azan, ya, ia sepatutnya dibincangkan dengan orang di sekitar kawasan tersebut (baik kawasan majoriti orang Islam apatah lagi orang bukan Islam). Jika ada yang tidak selesa, pihak masjid/surau/dll sepatutnya menggunakan budi bicara dengan menghadkan hanya penggunaan speaker dalam bangunan terbabit. Ataupun mengecilkan suara speaker luar sehingga hanya dapat didengari oleh orang yang berada di dalam kawasan masjid/surau/dll.

      Dan sebenarnya, ia adalah antara hak orang bukan Islam yang orang Islam perlu/mesti hormati.

      Tapi pasal pengwartaan, saya sangat tidak setuju.

      Reply
      • 33. Bel Acak  |  October 5, 2015 at 3:15 pm

        Saudara Pure,

        1. “Dari segi hukum pula, Azan bukanlah wajib.”
        Bukanlah maksud saya untuk menidakperlukan Azan dilaungkan.

        Apabila ada sudah ada peruntukan tanah untuk pembinaan Masjid/Surau disesebuah kawasan perumahan, dan terbinanya Masjid/Surau, maka ianya juga adalah bermakna akan datang bersamanya laungan azan setiap waktu solat. Samada kawasan itu majoritinya Muslim ataupun tidak.

        2. “saya rasa kita masih boleh berbincang dengan orang bukan Islam jika ramai yang bukan Islam tinggal di sekeliling kawasan masjid/surau”

        Jika ruang dibuka untuk berbincang, adakah pihak Masjid/Surau dapat menerima sekiranya bukan Muslim tidak bersetuju dengan laungan Azan?

        Saya tidak memberikan pilihan kepada anak2 saya sekiranya pilihan tersebut bukan pilihan yang saya boleh terima jika anak2 memilihnya.

        Contohnya: –
        Telah masuk waktu Maghrib, maka saya pun bertanya pada anak2..
        Dah masuk Maghrib ni, kita nak yang mana?
        a. Solat berjemaah di Masjid Setiawangsa.
        b. Solat berjemaah di Surau Al Amin
        c. Solat berjemaah di rumah
        d. Tak payah solat

        Dalam contoh di atas, saya tidak akan menyatakan pilihan (d) kepada anak2 kerana (d) bukanlah pilihan (option) yang saya boleh benarkan untuk mereka.

        “I don’t give an option for a choice that I can’t allow it to happen”

        Reply
        • 34. pure  |  October 5, 2015 at 4:41 pm

          bq.”Bukanlah maksud saya untuk menidakperlukan Azan dilaungkan.

          Apabila ada sudah ada peruntukan tanah untuk pembinaan Masjid/Surau disesebuah kawasan perumahan, dan terbinanya Masjid/Surau, maka ianya juga adalah bermakna akan datang bersamanya laungan azan setiap waktu solat. Samada kawasan itu majoritinya Muslim ataupun tidak.”

          Azan dengan penggunaan speaker yang kuat bagi hanya, misal kata, 10 penghuni Islam yang tidak dipersetujui oleh 100 penghuni bukan Islam di kawasan masjid/surau terbabit adalah lebih mudarat. Mudarat bagi orang Islam tersebut, mudarat bagi orang bukan Islam juga(mereka akan lebih menjauhi Islam dan lebih negatif terhadap orang Islam).

          Kerana ianya bukan wajiblah, kita kena lebih fokus akan kesan mudaratnya lebih daripada fokuskan hak kita ataupun mahu buat lebih lengkap/sempurna.

          Tetapi, dalam konteks negara kita, persefahaman dan tolak ansur sepatutnya dah lama wujud. Kita tak kisah bau asap setanggi setiap pagi, mahupun loceng kuil. Jadi apa salahnya jika mereka turut bertolak ansur.

          bg.”Jika ruang dibuka untuk berbincang, adakah pihak Masjid/Surau dapat menerima sekiranya bukan Muslim tidak bersetuju dengan laungan Azan?”

          Jika melibatkan kawasan majoriti bukan Islam, ya, pihak masjid/surau terpaksa akur. Itu adalah dari segi hukum dan adabnya, tetapi saya tak percaya mereka tak akan dengar langsung cadangan kita (e.g: akan diperlahankan suaranya berbanding sekarang sehingga dapat 1 nilai yang dipersetujui, atau komuniti Islam di situ akan beri sumbangan kepada institusi yang memberi manfaat kepada komuniti di situ, sekolah atau rumah orang tua di situ misalnya, dll).

          Tetapi dalam konteks negara kita di tambah lagi situasi sekarang, sepatutnya benda-benda macam ni tak patut timbul. Biar masjid/surau dengan azan, kuil dengan loceng, tokong dengan setanggi.

          Reply
          • 35. pure  |  October 5, 2015 at 5:22 pm

            Tambahan: “Itu adalah dari segi hukum […] ”
            Hukum yang saya maksudkan ialah tentang perbincangan tersebut. Jika sudah dipersetujui walaupun terpaksa, maka hendaklah dilaksanakan. Saya tak berani sebut tentang hukum hakam kerana diluar pengetahuan saya.

            Reply
  • 36. Ibu Zain  |  October 6, 2015 at 8:30 am

    Isu di PP, tulisan saya pada 5Okt15.

    Larangan guna pembesar suara di masjid kecuali Azan akan diwarta di Pulau Pinang: 70% EXCO Kerajaan Negeri PP BUKAN Islam

    Mufti PP Datuk Wan Salim Mohd Noor dilaporkan berkata proses pewartaan larangan itu akan mengambil masa antara dua hingga tiga bulan iaitu ia akan dibawa kepada Jabatan Penasihat Undang-undang Negeri dan MESYUARAT EXCO KERAJAAN NEGERI terlebih dahulu sebelum dimohon perkenan Yang di-Pertuan Agong.
    (http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v8/bm/ge/newsgeneral.php?id=1175512)

    Hari ini komposisi EXCO PP adalah 70% (8 orang) bukan Islam dan 30% (3 orang) Islam. Kita perlukan penjelasan dari Tuan Mufti Negeri dari aspek apakah yang bukan Islam ini akan terlibat dalam menentukan masa depan tarbiyah Islamiah dapat terus dipraktiskan tanpa diganggu gugat di negeri PP.

    Sekiranya semua masjid di PP menggunakan pembesar suara yang boleh di senggarakan kadar bunyinya, adakah masih ada keperluan untuk LARANGAN ini DIWARTAKAN? Kita tidak ada masalah untuk kadar suara direndahkan namun bukan untuk mengikat tangan dan minda UMMAH dgn pewartaan.

    Selagi tiada pencerahan tentang peranan 70% EXCO bukan Islam dalam hal ini, kita MENENTANG sekeras-kerasnya larangan ini dari diwartakan.

    Reply
  • 37. Roslee  |  October 29, 2015 at 5:23 pm

    Asrul you are really DAP dog, killing and ruin your own religion islam and race.What is the sermon been said in the mosque regards to the DAP towards Islam is true.That’s nothing to hide anymore.

    Reply

Dijemput memberi komen anda

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


My blog, my like

Helen Ang

Recent Posts

Kalender

October 2015
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Pengunjung

  • 7,403,999 hits

Archives

Feeds


%d bloggers like this: