In my posting earlier today, I made a mention of Rocky’s attempt at peace-keeping (screenshot below) between the Protun and the Projib.
Rocky was addressing the exchange of fire between two ‘Anons’ — Lim Sian See (Projib) and Jebat Must Die (Protun). Another Anon, Annie, also stepped into the fray and slammed LSS.
Band of brothers in blogosphere
“… I happen to know Annie, Jebat, LSS and many other Anons personally or by association,” wrote Rocky.
So do I and in fact, I also consider a few of the other staunchly Protun bloggers like Syed Akbar and Din Turtle to be my friends too.
It is a pity that the band of brothers, who were on friendly terms before the breakout of hostilities between the ex-premier and the sitting PM, should now be having “quarrels” to the point of Annie alleging that “Helen angry with Annie AGAIN” in a Life of Annie blog headline two days ago.
But you can read for yourself my posting a couple of days ago, ‘Umno should cut its losses, write-off Protun and off-set with PAS support’ to judge whether Annie’s sensational allegation that I was “angry” is true or not.
Instead of Annie being emotive, Annie should menghayati Rocky’s advice. After all, as t-h-e blogger paling otai dan tersohor, Rocky only means well in his peacemaking efforts.
Since Annie claims, “I advocate a reconciliation effort while Helen wants the opposite of that,” Annie really should reread the Rockybru posting above.
Now here comes the uncanny bit! See below.
The first comment in Rockybru in this very post title ‘Annie, LSS, Jebat Must Die, Grandmarquis and other Anon Bloggers‘ quite coincidentally mentioned both our names ‘Helen’ and ‘Annie’. The comment was actually uploaded on 13 Dec 2015 – more than two weeks ago – so its relevance is just purely a strange coincidence.
In any case, the commentator had a question one each for me and for Annie.
I will belatedly answer the question directed to me.
I’m giving Anonymous @@ Rockybru a reply now because his question has a connection to the predicament thrust upon me today by fan of Annie’s.
Rocky’s reader asked:
“Hai bro, takde gambar annie bro? Dia masih amoi atau ahsoh bro? Helen ang tu muslim ke bro? Mohon pencerahan.”
No, Anon. I’m not a Muslim. (Ball to Annie’s court next … please consider giving the guy your photo he’s pining for.)
Obviously, and nobody has to ask this to know – I’m not a Malay. Which brings us to a current comment by a reader of Annie going by the moniker ‘berasiam‘, as below.
“Annie bukan ahli Umno tapi layak untuk jadi ahli. Helen Ang hanya layak jadi ahli MCA atau Gerakan. Umno tak perlu dengar mana2 pandangan pun.”
So by virtue of being non-Malay and non-Muslim, my views on Umno are regarded as worthless in the eyes of berasiam whereas Annie’s – as a Malay-Muslim – is clearly the more valuable opinion.
Annie wins lah. (Annie is wrong to say that Helen wins – see below).
Annie wrote the ‘reminder’ three times
Annie left the reminder below in there separate postings on three separate days.
(“Note: No nasty remarks about Helen Ang allowed in this blog as she had requested me not to publish them. Go to her blog if any of you feels like doing that.”)
How kind of Annie.
All Annie’s readers can really see how “generous” is Annie from these reminders that Annie repeated three times – “No nasty remarks about Helen Ang allowed”.
But what Annie says it’s not true. I have never directly requested Annie to refrain from publishing “nasty remarks” about me. I had merely complained about being stalked 24/7 by a “creepy Christian” named Casey lurking in Annie’s blog.
Annie’s reminder No.1
— “No nasty remarks about Helen Ang allowed” in Annie’s blog … readers reminded on Dec 30
Annie’s reminder No.2 (the same wording)
— “No nasty remarks about Helen Ang allowed” in Annie’s blog … readers reminded once more on Dec 31
Annie wins, peace.
Annie’s reminder No.3 (identical with the earlier two)
— “No nasty remarks about Helen Ang allowed” in Annie’s blog … readers are again reminded on 2 Jan 2016
Annie’s nice words versus Annie’s actual actions
Perhaps Annie has different judgment and different values but I consider the comment below (which Annie permitted to be published) as definitely nasty.
The Dapster ‘Anon’ commented @ 17.21 that he wants to see me “in jail”.
And then there’s this other comment – see here – that Annie still permitted when the subject matter has totally no relevance to me.
The reader @ 11:24 – going off topic – commented that he/she “totally agrees” with the views expressed about me by the “Chinese ultra”.
What the “Chinese ultra” wrote is highlighted, linked and eagerly promoted by Annie today. In fact, Annie thanked the said “Chinese ultra” individual and accepted the defence penned by that Chinese ultra on Annie’s behalf.
In fact, Annie even encouraged Life of Annie readers to go to the Chinese ultra’s blog to read what he said about me.
So on the one hand, Annie makes a big show (three times) of reminding readers not to leave “nasty” remarks about me but on the other hand directs them to read the poison pen letter about me written by that Chinese ultra.
What the Chinese ultra wrote and Annie recommended blog readers to go read is as follows (the nasty bits):
- “that thug of a bitch”
- “Helen’s pathological hatred for the DAP people”
- “her thinking and character is not far different from an ISIS thug: with a gun she’ll blow out your brains”
- “What else do you think keeps her awake at 2 o’clock in the morning — sex? — tap, tap, tap, tapping on her keyboard, growing plumb (sic) and ugly by the minute on her chair, well-worn by her fat arse”
- “Can you picture the steam streaming out of her orifices”
- “Helen et al share the ISIS mentality, dogma and thuggery: ‘Either you are with us, or we’ll slice off your fucking throat.‘ ”
- “And if they triumph, imagine then what might be in store. They wouldn’t have qualms lining up people on the shores of the Malacca Straits (bottom), cut their heads and run to the ground what’s left of the country. Probably learned this from some Wahhabi-Arab donor.”
And there you have it. Three times Annie reminded blog readers, “No nasty remarks about Helen Ang allowed in this blog”.
So it’s a technicality: Annie is quite happy to recommended everybody to go to the Chinese ultra’s blog where I’m called “that thug of a bitch” who will “blow out your brains” with a gun.
Don’t forget, Annie had earlier written, “I advocate a reconciliation effort while Helen wants the opposite of that”.
Going by the material that Annie recommended for her readers to read, what kind of “reconciliation” – or what is the understanding of the word – do you reckon Protuns like Annie have in mind for the Projibs?