Posted in CLUELESS

Wanita cari maut berpakaian macam ini

Wear something like this, you die.

The entertaining and educational video explains why. Well worth your time watching.“It’s one of the worst pieces of wannabe armour that Hollywood has ever seen …”, says the video review of the heroine’s armour below from the movie Thor.

 

Minute 1:50 — “If you would get a strike on the shoulder, the [opponent’s] sword would just slide off and directly chop her head off”.

useless armour

Mr SnapJelly the videomaker explains (I’ve paraphrased below):

swordThe itsy bitsy teeny weeny shield is completely useless and her sword lacks a guard (see pix). Maybe she thinks she’s wielding a lightsaber.

Her chain mail is too short and furthermore worn in close fit without padding, which means the vest should rightly chafe her skin off.

Meanwhile the “weird” chest plate is fashioned with a cleavage bustline like Victoria’s Secret, hahaha.

Her unprotected arms can be easily hacked off … even a six-year-old role-playing Conan the Barbarian can see that. Another vulnerable spot is her exposed armpits begging to be lanced or speared.

And her legs are clad in what? Skinny jeans?! Oh okay, why wear armour when sword strikes will simply bounce off denim … now we know.

Delusional. She’s a Dapster!

Author:

I have no Faceook or Twitter.

13 thoughts on “Wanita cari maut berpakaian macam ini

  1. Have you seen Thor wearing armour in any of the movies starring the Hemsworth guy?

    Nope. The god from Asgard relies on his trusty hammer. Which has the useful ability to return back to his hand after being thrown at a target.

    And, in any case, the people making the superhero movies aren’t big on ittybitty details….hahaha.

    Now, what is the connection with Dapsters?

    You are not suggesting that they are wielding hammers a la Thor, are you?

    1. If they’re designing armour for her, at least lah design something that makes sense.

      re: “Now, what is the connection with Dapsters?”

      All flash, no substance. This actress does not look psychically convincing for the role.

      TV’s Lucy Lawless as Xena or Angelina Jolie as Lara Croft or that Brienne female knight in Game of Thrones are more believable.

      1. Xena’s sidekick Gabrielle (played by Renee O’Connor) didn’t wear any armour at all. She looked all soft and feminine, but she could kick *** with the best of them.

        Fiction, remember? Like the legendary Amazons who weren’t big on head-to-toe armour anyway.

        But I digress.

        If the Dapsters are “all flash, no substance”, I suppose the same could also be said of Umno, MCA and MIC members. Or those who “crashed and burned” during the financial crises…..

        1. r: “Xena’s sidekick Gabrielle (played by Renee O’Connor) didn’t wear any armour at all. She looked all soft and feminine”

          Renee looked like a high school cheerleader. Lucy Lawless had the imposing stature.

          re: “Fiction, remember?”

          Xena was a dramedy (drama-comedy). Thor is silver screen and took itself seriously, no?

          re: “Like the legendary Amazons who weren’t big on head-to-toe armour anyway.”

          It’s you modern guys who dress those women warriors like your S&M fantasy. Anyway the video I posted was correct about the shield — really way too skimpy.

          re: “If the Dapsters are ‘all flash, no substance’, I suppose the same could also be said of Umno, MCA and MIC members.”

          Wouldn’t know about MIC but MCA men look like a convention of dentists, and their Wanita like the Amway/Tupperware Lady. They’re not DAP poseurs who wear tudung ‘uniform’ to Occupy Masjid.

  2. Hello sis. Women wear something like this not to diela.. they want it..
    Fill men fantasy… nothing to do with ugly DAP women btw..

  3. Helen,

    You do realise this is merely fiction/fantasy, don’t you?

    I mean, what next?

    Complaints about the movie, Avatar?

    But then, maybe you should mock such silly depictions..

    After all, we have people who really believe in resurrections, turning water into wine, flying horses, splitting moons, stones becoming warriors, etc etc.

    Perhaps, you should write an article about those fantastic beliefs as well :)

    1. AOM,

      Exposing her arms like that is just so unreal. They will get hacked.

      I mean yes – fantasy – flying unicorns/dragons and all that but why stretch our suspension of disbelief when the costumers could just design the armour more realistically.

      It’s the crime of Dapsterism! Wearing a costume that’s not believable (“delusional”). Like Hannah and her interns in their tudung.

      1. Which part of sci-fi & fantasy don’t you get?

        Nobody questions why Wonder Woman is depicted wearing an outfit that is a bit on the skimpy side. Or the costumes worn by Supergirl or the Black Widow or Catwoman!

        As for DAPsters, why do they have to adhere to a dress code?

        Like why do MAS flight stewardesses wear the famed sarong kebaya uniform which is supposed to be the preserve of certain communities?

        Are they being “delusional”?

        Or when Emirates flight stewardesses wear headscarves as part of their uniforms when they are of different races and religions?

        1. re: “Nobody questions why Wonder Woman is depicted wearing an outfit that is a bit on the skimpy side. Or the costumes worn by Supergirl or the Black Widow or Catwoman!”

          The Thor woman is fighting opponents who use swords.

          Supergirl and Catwoman are not (necessarily) fighting opponents who wield swords.

  4. Here’s how the character looks like in comic, no armor, just a midriff top.

Comments are closed.