One million rakyat signed Deklarasi Mahathir but half cannot join Tun’s party

August 5, 2016 at 10:02 am 39 comments

Tun claims that more than one million Malaysians signed his declaration aimed at removing Najib Razak from office.

His old crony Ling Liong Sik was welcomed to endorse Deklarasi Mahathir (pix below). Nonetheless, Tun Dr Ling cannot join Dr Mahathir’s new party which is open only to bumiputera and Ling, alas, is no prince of the soil.

Neither are other prime movers of the Deklarasi, Ambiga and Maria Chin Abdullah, eligible to apply for membership in Tun’s new party. Maria can be accepted without restriction  into PAS though.

????????????????????????????????????

So what is new in the opposition’s Politik Baru?

The noisy young fella Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman is reported to be a protem committee member of Tun’s party that is soon to be officially launched (pending RoS approval).

But Adrian Lim Chee En, another noisy young fella who is Syed Saddiq’s contemporary, does not qualify to apply. Adrian may be bangsa Anak Malaysia but still, Tun’s party has no place for him.

Adrian Syed Saddiiq

No winds of change but perhaps a perfect storm coming up

DAP has been peddling its New Politics to the suckers but the opposition front that is shaping up is the same old, same old.

The new New Hope coalition is clearly not able to get away from Race and Religion markers. Tun’s party is race based and to all intents and purposes for Malays only and those who pass muster as Malay.

Meanwhile, the splinter party PAN is religion-based — identical to its mothership PAS, and limited to Muslims.

Tell me again how Pakatan Harapan is any better than the BN.

bersih 5.0

Recycle … dirty laundry there as long as you wear clothes

DAP rhetoric is all about “colour blind” and “beyond race”. Yet the evangelical party is leading an opposition comprising race and religion-based parties that is no different from the BN formula.

If its any consolation to the 95 percent Chinese who are staunch backers of ABU, the evolved opposition line-up – which will include Tun’s party – promises a revival of Mahathirism but with one caveat.

Dr Mahathir is today no longer in his prime. The master Machiavelli – at his advanced age of 90-plus – remains sharp but not so sharp as to be immune from manipulation.

Are the manipulative evangelistas capable of steering Tun in the direction that they want? Yup.

parrot ani

Protun parrots trained by RBA to repeat DAP propaganda

In the current set-up where Tun and Protuns bersekongkol (there is no equivalent word in English with the same oomph) dengan DAP and Dapsters, it is the evangelical Chinese who have the upper hand.

This is seen in how the RBA have successfully brainwashed the Protuns and trained their Malay macai to be parrots.

Make a note of this. Observe carefully what the Protuns are griping about. Then see if these Malays are beginning to sound like echoes of their Cina DAP counterparts.

In BN, Umno is the undisputed Big Brother. In Pakatan, the Protuns are being turned into Dapsters.

Between the two coalitions, supporting the opposition is more beneficial for the Chinese. This is especially so for those getting a cheap thrill from hearing their kiasu words coming out of the mouth of Melayu DAP and Protuns who will soon be indistinguishable from Dapsters.

If you can’t beat ’em, get them to join you instead.

Entry filed under: Melayu DAP, Protun. Tags: .

(UPDATED) Open tender for Jamal Sekinchan tailoring contract Najib knows but what will he do?

39 Comments Add your own

  • 1. siri  |  August 5, 2016 at 12:38 pm

    Jika tak di pecah buyong mana nak dapat sagu nya makna kata nak KO Najib kena tarik Melayu yang tebal semangat kebangsaan mereka tak kan nak tarik masuk neraka pulak tak gitu Cik Helen

    Reply
  • 2. Surrhead  |  August 5, 2016 at 2:21 pm

    This i gotta agree with HA……..a real dumb move…..creating another umno
    Well, this move might just reduce umno’s vote – but nothing more than that.
    Race based politics has got to go.

    Reply
  • 3. Mulan  |  August 5, 2016 at 3:10 pm

    My crystal ball like previous attempts by former UMNO past presidents to start new parties, these parties again will not have a good respond from the public and then later merge with UMNO.

    Where is Onn Jaafar’s Parti Negara?
    Where is S46?

    Only PKR has managed to stay alive until now…. but with Anwar in jail and Azmin making his rounds, how long will this party last.

    I don’t think Mahathir’s new party and PAN would last very long. More like a limited engagement.

    Reply
  • 4. sotong kurita  |  August 5, 2016 at 3:12 pm

    What is the problem with all that Helen ? . You seem to be very concerned about Malays, unfortunately you can’t be one of them. I believe MCA would love to have you as one of their “beloved” member

    Reply
    • 5. Helen Ang  |  August 5, 2016 at 3:34 pm

      Macam-macam. The other guy Setem pula accused me of despising Malays.

      Why would I want to be a Malay if God made me Chinese? If I’m born an Eskimo/Maori/Swedish/Thai, I’d be happy and content being an Eskimo/Maori/Swedish/Thai … whatever

      Unlike Hannah Yeoh, I have no need to change my religion or my race.

      Unlike the DAP’s bangsa Anak Malaysia people, I have never repudiated my race.

      When you all anti-Najibs have got nothing to use in which to attack me, you make up stories (like the Dapsters making up the story that Joceline Tan is the daughter of a Gerakan politician).

      Reply
  • 6. Zack  |  August 5, 2016 at 3:54 pm

    Mahathir is a desperate man. Lately all his attacks do not seem that smart. This new party is dead on arrival. Even his macai the selfie guy Khairuddin is not keen to join the new party. This is his party to push for his son, Mukhriz, to become a Prime Minister of a fantasy land. Desperate man like Mahathir will do anything. Even begging the Great Satan of USA to meddle in Malaysian affairs.

    Reply
  • 7. Setem  |  August 5, 2016 at 4:56 pm

    quote,’When you all anti-Najibs have got nothing to use in which to attack me, you make up stories (like the Dapsters making up the story that Joceline Tan is the daughter of a Gerakan politician).’unquote.

    You made up stories about Annie being an imposter; half age Malay man rejected from NST posing as a mixed Cina-Malay lady.

    When we asked you to show proof, you refused to give one. Why? Takut salah or takut kena saman?

    And at the same time you bebel (nag, but no oomph in English word)about DAPricks and Protuns spreading fitnahs in your blogs when you accused Annie with no proof which is the same as spreading fitnahs.

    And why are you so concerned with Tun M setting up a new Malay party? The party and PH won’t make a dent to BN’s staying in power since Najib as you alleged has a full grip of all UMNO Ketua Bahagians, all other BN components leaders, all dedak-paid Malaysians, that BN can withstand the onslaught from other opposition parties in the next GE.

    Your blind devotion to Najib is yours, don’t be a hypocrite by putting down others whose devotion to Tun M is as blind as your devotion to Najib.

    Reply
    • 8. Helen Ang  |  August 5, 2016 at 8:12 pm

      Will reply you after dinner.

      Reply
    • 9. Helen Ang  |  August 5, 2016 at 10:34 pm

      re: “You made up stories about Annie being an imposter”

      Annie is the one who is the extremely malicious and inventive storyteller.

      As a Muslim, you must surely be aware that azab api neraka awaits munafik pemfitnah jenis macam Annie.

      re: “half age Malay man”

      Yes, Annie is middle-aged and he’s male. If you are convinced otherwise, why don’t you tell us Annie’s age. You think he’s 22 ke? And if you believe he’s female, then show us lah Annie‘s photo.

      Like I’ve told you before, Annie’s identity is an open secret. And photos of any of the alpha bloggers can easily be found online,

      for e.g. there’s one photo of me with Din Turtle and a few other prominent bloggers uploaded in one of the Malay alpha blogs; there are photos of Jebat taken at media events, of Big Dog & A Voice plenty…

      but the Chinese girl photos with which Annie tries to dupe his gullible readers (such as yourself) are those sourced from China Internet as I’ve proven before.

      re: “rejected from NST posing as a mixed Cina-Malay lady”

      If you cannot even verify this simple fact by asking around the political circles, the media circles or the blogging circles, then obviously your networking is piss poor, and your judgment even poorer.

      Why don’t you surf or browse and see if there’s anybody – yang dikenali dan ada nama – in blogosphere who has ever stepped up to defend Annie, and vouched that ‘Annie’ is really a young woman and testified “nah, here’s a photo of me (the witness/saksi) and Annie together”. Ada? Pernah tengok?

      I can only say you’re bangang tahap gaban to believe in an avatar that’s a cartoon.

      re: “When we asked you to show proof, you refused to give one.”

      Sure, go ahead. First you prove that Annie is not a cartoon. What is Annie’s name? What is Annie’s age? What is Annie’s job and which company? In which state is Annie residing/working?

      You saqy something, and I’ll refute you.

      re: “Why? Takut salah or takut kena saman?”

      I have repeatedly proclaimed that Annie is a liar and a fraud. It’s very easy for Annie to turn the tables. He can just tampilkan diri and show that he’s a woman. You tunggu lah. Kan sabar itu separuh daripada iman?

      In the meantime, I’m going to call you a pemfitnah. Kalau you berani, I will accompany you to a mosque – anytime, anywhere – and you can sumpah laknat me. But if what I’m saying is true, then your sumpah will pantul balik kepada Setem. You dare?

      re: “And at the same time you bebel (nag, but no oomph in English word)about DAPricks and Protuns spreading fitnahs in your blogs when you accused Annie with no proof which is the same as spreading fitnahs.”

      I repeat my offer. You can sumpah laknat me anytime, anywhere on condition the curse boomerangs back to the one who is lying. Go ahead, take up my tempting offer.

      Siakap senohong gelama ikan duri,
      Setem dengar Annie cakap bohong, dia pun jadi DAP

      re: “And why are you so concerned with Tun M setting up a new Malay party?”

      He appeals to all Malaysians and fellow citizens to join his fight (Declaration) but when he sets up his new party, he slams the door in their face. Your type of leader.

      re: “all dedak-paid Malaysians”

      Ya lor. Everybody who supports the establishment is pemakan dedak. Only Protuns and Dapsters are suci murni.

      re: “Your blind devotion to Najib is yours, don’t be a hypocrite by putting down others whose devotion to Tun M is as blind as your devotion to Najib.”

      I think “Setem” is a good name to give this pet below.

      Reply
        • 11. Helen Ang  |  August 6, 2016 at 12:44 am

          Nilai RM1 jer? Eh murahnya.

          Reply
        • 12. HY  |  August 6, 2016 at 1:14 am

          i guess pos msia will issue commemorative stamp of dedak, in total 2.6b.

          Reply
          • 13. RINA  |  August 6, 2016 at 5:32 am

            HY

            Thats a good suggestion. Dedak bagi oghang kampung nilainya besar sekali. Jangan pandang hina tau. Kami jadikan makanan ternakan ayam, itik, lembu, kambing, kerbau, kuda dan ikan2. Belori2 kami angkut buat medium tanaman cendawan dan batu bata..

            Tapi babi2 tak makan dedak, segalanya termasuk tahi2 air kencing mereka balun. Jijik!

            Reply
      • 14. L  |  August 6, 2016 at 2:32 pm

        Helen, I (Laksa Johor) posed a question to Annie this morning in her blog on whether she is the imposter that you claimed her to be. She removed my comment and this was the reply that I received from her :-

        Laksa Johor6 August 2016 at 07:19 :-

        This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

        Reply

        Annie6 August 2016 at 12:17 :-

        Sorry. Guess you haven’t noticed that I have banned the name you mentioned in this blog since the start of the year. It’s because I’m of a different standard. As for your question, why don’t you decide for yourself what to believe. This blog is my space to express my thoughts, not actually for me to make people believe in this and that. Hope that satisfies you. Thank you.

        Reply
      • 15. Laksa Johor  |  August 6, 2016 at 2:37 pm

        Helen, I posed a question to ‘Annie’ this morning on her/his blog on whether she/he is the imposter that you claimed her/him to be. She/he removed my comment and this was his/her reply to me :-

        Laksa Johor6 August 2016 at 07:19

        This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
        Reply

        Annie6 August 2016 at 12:17

        Sorry. Guess you haven’t noticed that I have banned the name you mentioned in this blog since the start of the year. It’s because I’m of a different standard. As for your question, why don’t you decide for yourself what to believe. This blog is my space to express my thoughts, not actually for me to make people believe in this and that. Hope that satisfies you. Thank you.

        Reply
        • 16. Helen Ang  |  August 6, 2016 at 7:21 pm

          Annie bans my name because he’s afraid of being sued.

          He prefers to pay dirty and keep hitting below the belt through his RBA cohorts making innuendoes and sniper attacks by applying their slew of vile nicknames.

          The toxicity of the insults and slurs that only their vicious kind of people can think of and tergamak to use. Betul tak?

          They think that without actually pinning down a name, they can mock anything and slander anything.

          You can evaluate for yourself whether Annie permitting that sort of comments which he does – you now which ones – shows any standard or human decency.

          In comparison, you can appraise whether my blog has so far ever allows any low blows against Annie the kind of comments such as “khnizir betina” (and much worse, which you will be aware) that Annie consistently lets through daily.

          You can think critically, right?

          And if you have Johor connections (going by your moniker), you can always ask Khaled Nordin’s boys or Umno Johor for the truth.

          If you believe Annie (i.e. unable to sort the wheat from the chaff), then I’m afraid that Umno is in big trouble wrt the perception battle.

          How do you think the RBA managed to turn 95 percent o the Chinese against the gomen? It’s through their non-stop lying and malicious fitnah.

          Now Annie has become one of the chief purveyors of lies and slander.

          Reply
      • 17. Setem  |  August 6, 2016 at 8:47 pm

        I told you before before you label other people as parrots you should look yourself in your mirror.

        All your readers know that you have been parroting what your PMO handlers want you to write in your blog.

        You’ve been reminding the Malays and parroting your curses and fitnahs in your blog on Annie as if the Malays are tolol people (maybe Rina is the only example) that they can’t think for themselves.

        It takes a parrot to know one, you know!

        Reply
        • 18. Helen Ang  |  August 6, 2016 at 9:44 pm

          re: “you have been parroting what your PMO handlers want you to write in your blog”

          I fear for the future of my country if there are many Setems among the Malay community (which is the majority population) because of your acute lack of rational thinking.

          Are you claiming that PMO is instructing me to write about Annie, Hannah, evangelistas and their Nest in Phileo Damansara (location of J-Star HQ)?

          (a) Don’t lah over-estimate the importance of an anonymous blogger.

          While I personally have a bone to pick with him aka Annie because of all the lies that he has concocted about me, I really doubt that the PMO harbours any red alert (national interest) wrt “a little lady of the valley” middle-aged male masquerading as a teacher/lecturer, i.e. “educator” as per his faked biodata.

          (b) I’ve never come across PMO showing any interest in Hannah. Even Selangor Umno is not tackling HY’s influence (i.e. popularity) as they should.

          The only blogger who has been in the PM’s crosshairs appears to be Syed Akbar, and many of us in the blogging fraternity believe that Najib’s outburst – where he blurted out the word “bangang” – is directed at SAA.

          If I were receiving directives from PMO, I’d be trying to patahkan hujah-hujah SAA, especially on the 1MDB issue which he blogs copiously on. Do you see me mentioning SAA, aside from referring to him as the blogger who outed Annie?

          Hannah does not slam 1MDB beyond a few sly prods in her tweets. If I was on the PMO payroll as you allege, then I’d have to try and discredit Tony Pua’s arguments as he’s the DAP go-to man on 1MDB and not Hannah.

          (c) I’ve been saying that the J-Star are evangelistas since Day 1 of my blog — which was five years ago.

          Have you heard the PMO ever express concern about evangelistas as a threat? Instead PMO has voiced its concern that ISIS poses a danger and might bring an extremist religious ideology to Malaysia.

          PMO and I are not only the same page. It boggles the mind why you keep insisting that PMO is teing me what to write.

          You’re exactly like the Dapsters. It’s high morality when it is you supporting Tun (and the Dapsters support their Lim dynasty) but Projibs must all be pemakan dedak – including the PAS ulamas – only because we see DAP as a threat to the status quo.

          When pro-establishment people object to Tun and Protuns bersekongkol dengan musuh Islam, are we not making a valid observation and point?

          And when we highlight the hypocrisy of Tun not only condoning but joining (Bersih 4.O) street protests and lately calling for the public to take to the streets (Bersih 5.0) – don’t forget that he cracked down on Anwar’s reformasi rallies as well as warned us that the oppo was using Bersih 3.0 to spark an Arab Spring – we are labelled pemakan dedak Najib.

          Protuns and Dapsters dah 2 x 5. The newly minted opposition is breathing life into Orwell’s Animal Farm analogy.

          You all want to depose Najib and in the process, you’re willing for yourselves to be turned into Dapsters.

          Reply
  • 19. Equalizer  |  August 5, 2016 at 6:14 pm

    The trouble with DAP chinese is that they are so gullible and stupid to think that a leopard can change its spots. LKS should know very well who is Mahathir? Again and again the 2 Lims of DAP had taken the chinese for a ride and they seemed to be still dreaming.
    These DAP chinese are suffering from Acquired Delusive Disorder.(ADD)

    Reply
    • 20. AK47  |  August 5, 2016 at 8:21 pm

      Equalizer. Please refer to Bilahari Kausikan’s outburst on the ‘delusional DAP Chinese’ in the Singapore Straits Times October 2015. The Apparatchiks of Singapore lost their patience at the Lim Dynastic Sandiwara which is not in keeping with the fast political game changing of modern times. The much vaunted Defence Line – Muar-Batu Pahat of the Singapore 300,000 strong military is now out-dated by the latest in tactics. Singapore’s Defence Line is UMNO in KL. Irony of all ironies !

      Reply
  • 21. AK47  |  August 5, 2016 at 6:25 pm

    Ms H. I believe in historical facts which will give us an inkling into the future. First, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad made the fundamental error of retiring abruptly without the proper preparation of a replacement Prime Minister in an immature political milieu. He should have stayed on. Second, having done that, Tun could not establish rapport with those who assumed the Prime Minister’s job after him. These personalities whom he knew very closely for years, were now found wanting in his eyes. There are many ways to cut the cake. Third, having failed in his attempts to remove the incumbent Prime Minister, he and others will form a political party exactly like the UMNO which he was President for 22 years at a time when urbanisation has drawn the Rakyat closer to each other through the social media. There is an ancient saying ‘ Two wrongs do not make a right.’

    Reply
  • 22. HY  |  August 5, 2016 at 10:10 pm

    y wanna join the mahathir party? 4 cornered fight is what we look forward after pas under hadi dah makan dedak.

    Reply
    • 23. Helen Ang  |  August 5, 2016 at 10:45 pm

      re: “after pas under hadi dah makan dedak”

      You don’t believe that many ulama in PAS are honestly revolted by the DAP?

      So in your opinion, ustaz Nik Abduh makan dedak juga ke?

      Reply
      • 24. HY  |  August 6, 2016 at 1:29 am

        no i dun. the ulama gang do not have the capability to compete with the professional in pas (now mostly in amanah) n umno. the revolt is merely their excuse for power. n compare to khairy, nik abduh is merely an idiot,

        Reply
  • 25. Abdullah  |  August 5, 2016 at 11:14 pm

    rileklah kak Helen, kalau akak tak boleh join ramai lagi boleh join. 1 million tu bukan hanya Marina dan Ambiga sahaja

    https://helenang.wordpress.com/2015/03/03/tick-tock-tick-tock-najibs-days-are-numbered/#more-56014

    Tell me, what kind of people are the flagbearers prominently defending Najib Razak in the digital (or print) media? I’m willing to bet my bottom dollar that this ‘Iskandar Mohamad’ is one of ’em consultants. This is my strong suspicion.

    And I’m going to say this about Dato’ Seri Najib, and mind you, my political predictions in the past have all been uncannily accurate.

    With the unravelling of 1MDB on top of the kind of people that you have around you, sir – and there are more than just a few of them – your premiership will surely self-destruct, and sooner than we anticipate.

    Reply
    • 26. Helen Ang  |  August 5, 2016 at 11:26 pm

      Fair enough, Abdullah.

      Helen Ang wrote in May 2015, “With the unravelling of 1MDB on top of the kind of people that you have around you, sir […] your premiership will surely self-destruct, and sooner than we anticipate.”

      Desperate times make for desperate men – on both sides of the poitical divide – who will take desperate measures.

      The logic of the situation — Malaysia is divided into two:

      (1) The Yellow Shirts @ Bersih who want to topple him through people power uprising aka street demos
      (b) The Red Shirts who will defend the Prez for the sake of Bangsa, Agama & Negara

      And we know that Tun and Protuns are marching with the Yellow.

      Bring it on. A simple colour chart for you.

      null

      Reply
      • 27. Abdullah  |  August 5, 2016 at 11:38 pm

        Oh Kak! Red Shirt untuk Bangsa, Agama dan Negara?

        hahaha takkan lah Kak Helen begitu naive tak kenal siapa Jamal Ikan Bakar? Apa dah jadi pada restoran ikan bakar? Atau soalan yang lebih utama, apa dah jadi pada Kedai Ikan 1 Malaysia?

        Ada nampak lagi ke kedai ni di mana2?

        Desperate times make for desperate men?? Women included kan kak? So, what kind of people are the flagbearers prominently defending Najib ?

        Reply
        • 28. Helen Ang  |  August 5, 2016 at 11:53 pm

          Who are the flag bearers standing behind Tun?

          You (oppo) claim/imply that Najib’s lieutenants are pemakan dedak.

          On the other hand, Tun’s lieutenants are never pemakan dedak.

          Therefore Tun’s formerly bankrupt, currently globetrotter Khairuddin is a hulubalang mulia, his Anina is srikandi sejati and his newfound Dapster allies are mesra-Islam.

          Reply
          • 29. Abdullah  |  August 6, 2016 at 6:24 pm

            Kak Helen tak menjawab soalan nampaknya. Ialah kak, kalau dulu Mr. Clueless, sekarang defend gila2, tentulah menu telah bertukar dedak kan?

            Dulu semasa Kak Helen defend tun ada dapat apa2 habuan kah?

            https://helenang.wordpress.com/2014/11/21/pohon-tun-kasi-boikot-pau/

            kalau Khairuddin dapat dedak, takkan lah dia boleh dibankrapkan yer tak?

            Reply
            • 30. Helen Ang  |  August 6, 2016 at 7:05 pm

              Saya sebenarnya tidak berupaya menilik sama ada pentadbiran Najib akan mampu bertahan melepasi PRU14.

              Akan tetapi pada hemat saya, mahu tak mahu, PM terpaksa berpegang kepada cogankata “no retreat, no surrender”. Berundur bukan menjadi piihan.

              Andaikata BN tumbang, negara kita akan diambil alih oleh Dapster dan Protun (jenis seperti kamu).

              Kalau tak sokong Najib pun saya tidak sekali-kali mahu melihat kuasa jatuh ke tangan Dapster-Protun. Tengok fiil macam Abdullah ini pun dah rasa jelek.

              Abdullah ketandusan modal nampaknya.

              Kan saya dah sebut, puak yang anti-Najib ataupun dalam kata lain kelompok Protun (ada pertindihan di antara dua golongan ini), sebenarnya pelanduk/parrot dua serupa dengan RBA.

              Biarlah.

              Abdullah jangan lupa beli kemeja-T yang warna kuning ya. Dah lah bersekongkol, alang-alang menyeluk pemasam, biar sampai k pangkal lengan.

              Reply
        • 31. RINA  |  August 7, 2016 at 5:20 am

          Abdullah,
          …Atau soalan yang lebih utama, apa dah jadi pada Kedai Ikan 1 Malaysia?…

          Alaa aa ikan bakaq tu toknek bebudak tak kira bangsa dan agama kat rumah masing2 pun bole bakaq. Katop pun takpe. Now on Jamal, Alhamdulillah his contributions will be well remembered for a long time;

          http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/more-tech-malls-lined-up-for-malay-vendors

          Reply
          • 32. Helen Ang  |  August 7, 2016 at 9:20 am

            Rina,

            The RBA are impersonating you in the Life of Annie blog as a part of their dirty tactic to kenakan me.

            Reply
            • 33. RINA  |  August 7, 2016 at 10:53 am

              Life of Annie? I never visit the blog. None from my group fwdd any article from there so its out of our radar, of no interest to us.

              I visit yr blog as most often you will accompany with datas n figures, charts and analysis etc. which not many bloggers hv the skills to bring to us readers.

              …gitu desperate ya depa nih? Kekeke

              Reply
              • 34. Helen Ang  |  August 7, 2016 at 11:20 am

                re: “gitu desperate ya depa nih?”

                Yes, faked comment. They cut & pasted a passage of what I wrote in my main article and tagged your name ‘Rina’ to their comment. Then they spin their propaganda/smear.

                It’s not too difficult to see their latest tactic and what they hope to achieve by taking that new line of attack. What it boils down to is ‘What Kind of People are They?’ Already gutter level but they still wanna go lower.

                Dema diabolical, on top of desperate.

                In my opinion, blogger-blogger otai Umno (not referring to you) should visit Annie’s blog to study the extent of the Dapster pathology.

                While Annie may be able to fool the casual reader, the Umno veteran bloggers are mostly battle-hardened and have had even more exposure to oppo dirty agitprop than me (and I’ve long seen how they operate in the Maaysiakini readers’ forum).

                The Umno media team will be able to spot how the RBAs have further refined the dirty tricks of the trade since the 2000s.

                Moreover, many of them know Annie’s real identity and he can’t dupe them as he does Setem, et al.

                The thing is orang Melayu cenderung untuk bersangka baik and it’s not usually within your social and religious frame of reference to put you antenna up. Your natural assumption is that people automatically tell the truth.

                With the Dapsters is, whatever they can lie about in order to skew public perception, they will — such as making up the story that Joceine Tan is the daughter of the former (late) Penang Gerakan chairman.

                In our parents/grandparents’ time, they wondered how the Bintang Tiga can commit such atrocities. In our time, the Bintang Lima don’t hide in the woods but live in the concrete jungle, and they don’t carry bayonets but carry smart phones.

                Nonetheless the nature of the kiasu beast remains the same. Vicious, ruthless, they stop at nothing and are determined to win at Annie cost. He is their kuda tunggangan.

                W

                Reply
  • 35. AK47  |  August 5, 2016 at 11:59 pm

    Ms H. The trouble with political dynasties like the DAP/PAP is that the heir tries to outdo the founder and fails. The next 14th GE is the most initeresting of all our elections. We have run short of leaders especially in the Opposition which will have the same old fare on offer considering the fact that Malaysia is one of the few countries in the World which have so many layers of governments in a cyberworld – a case of over-governance. There is an obvious mis-match in the political will of Opposition parties. With so much difficulty to sleep in the same bed, we do not expect them to have the same dreams !
    Remember, I said ‘ In 1997 if the DPM had taken a holiday in the US, he would have returned as the PM ‘. Then I said. ‘ if the Opposition had sorted out the 32 Aduns before the 12th GE, the Opposition would have been in Putrajaya since 2008.’ Finally, I said that if the Opposition had boycotted the 13th GE and followed by a 100 day fast to death by checking into the lst Class Ward of the KLGH, they would have been in Putrajaya since May 2013. What should the Opposition do to win at the next 14th GE ? Do you think they deserve to be in Putrajaya after bungling in 3 GEs ? They have already emasculated themselves through the golden opportunites in the last 3 GEs. There is only one answer for the Opposition come what may with a new opposition party in play.

    Reply
    • 36. HY  |  August 6, 2016 at 1:36 am

      the main problem with opposition is dap.

      Reply
      • 37. AK47  |  August 6, 2016 at 1:33 pm

        HY. The answer to the success or failure of both BN and the Opposition which is mainly DAP is to be found in those colour charts of rural/urban seats since 2015 as furnished by Ms H. The insight into the charts are so glaring. Sometimes, I wonder what the professional strategists have been doing. The most difficult of problems are normally solved by the simplest of answers.

        Reply
  • 38. IT.Scheiss  |  August 6, 2016 at 12:00 am

    Aren’t 900,000 of those signatures allegedly have been taken from a database and hence fraudulent?

    Reply
    • 39. Helen Ang  |  August 6, 2016 at 12:02 am

      Are you saying Tun is a fraud?

      No wonder then that Annie is a Protun, haha.

      Reply

Dijemput memberi komen anda

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


My blog, my like

Helen Ang

Recent Posts

Kalender

August 2016
M T W T F S S
« Jul   Sep »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Pengunjung

  • 7,406,782 hits

Archives

Feeds


%d bloggers like this: