Pribumi silat master, DAP taichi sifu circling each other

October 17, 2019 at 10:44 am 2 comments

It’s hypocritical to protest Universiti Malaya vice chancellor Abdul Rahim Hashim as “racist” while still embracing Mahathir as chairman of the new Hope.

There was nothing of the content of Rahim’s speech (video below, in full) at the Malay Dignity Congress that did not come from the Mahathir playbook. Rahim said nothing that Mahathir had not already mouthed many times before in recent years, or that Mahathir had not reiterated even just lately.

In fact his words were a mere mirror image of standard Mahathirism 101 rhetoric, the DAP’s New Malaysia bullshit notwithstanding.

And if Rahim hurt any sensitive Chinese feelings, he was only treading in Mahathir’s footsteps in claiming the freedom of speech even if it offends.

After all, the right of free speech is perennially touted by Harapan, especially the DAP.

BELOW: The indefatigable old anti Semite defends his lifelong right to ‘free’ly insult the Jews

But now DAP stormtroopers – its youth wing – are demanding the VC’s resignation.

The party’s younger members must be chafing at the bit after being restrained by Mahathir’s Chinese quislings – the Lim running dogs.

Is the present attack on Rahim reflective of the Chinese proverb killing the chicken to scare the (‘M’ for) Monkey?

The Amanat Mahathir congress enabled by Universiti Malaya was a silat performance by Parti Pribumi. The manufactured outrage against the university VC is the DAP’s taichi. Both are wayang only.

Entry filed under: #NotMyGomen. Tags: .

Guan Eng wants MCA to let go TAR College … (into Maszlee’s hands)? Will DAP still be in gomen after May 2020?

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. bnm  |  October 17, 2019 at 11:48 am

    Helen,

    Rahim is a VC of a public uni. He must be professional and non-partisan. He must not be seen as bias and allowing himself to be used as a tool to further political agenda. There are merits to demand his resignation.

    The Kongress were organised by 4 public universities, ie. UM, UPSI, UiTM and UPM. UKM (one of the top public uni) was not involved. Consider this:

    1) What UM gained considering the controversies (protest by a student during convocation) and the VC’s display of partisanship by organising the Kongress?

    2) What is UKM’s loss by not organising the Kongress?

    The way I see it, UKM made a smart decision by not organising the Kongress.

    Reply
    • 2. Nurul  |  October 20, 2019 at 9:15 pm

      Which part of his speech that promotes racism?

      Reply

Dijemput memberi komen anda

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Recent Posts

My blog, my like

Helen Ang

RSS Cucu Tok Selampit

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Abu Leman

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Celah Gelegar

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Info Watan

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Archives

Pengunjung

  • 8,455,142 hits

Kalender

October 2019
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

%d bloggers like this: